Integral debate analyzer

[integral]

https://integrl.link/468k5nnu

This is awesome.

It breaks down a debate by giving a profile of both individuals epistemically and through the whole integral model.

Click "tour"

 

Imagine if our conversations were all mapped out like this into a mindmap were we can build out our perspectives and see the full map of discourse broken down into all components.

Instead of a back and forth text chat we can have a mind map component system where we are debating through building each other's perspectives in a visual plus text way.

The Ai can build the map automatically so we can see the map as we talk back and forth with each other naturally, and then we can edit the map if we feel like the AI doesn't represent our perspective correctly. To clarify things.

Then the map that we're building all fits into a larger database of past conversations throughout the whole website and then we could see a history of similar perspectives and likeness perspectives or contrasting perspectives. Basically organizing a collective mind

Edited 2 hours ago by integral

[Leo Gura]

Interesting use of AI.

Edited 2 hours ago by Leo Gura

[zurew]

Some kind of visual representation of debates and conversations would be generally useful.

But not the kind of thing that is presented on the integral site.

I dont know even know how to interpret the categorization scores presented there.

Like what does it mean for a position to be 3.5 rational rather than just 3.4 rational? And also unclear how many ways that 0.1 difference can be achieved or explained .

Also not sure why foreground that a position is 3.5 rational rather than that it scores low on some kind of non-rational or irrational metric.

But maybe im being unfair.

Edited 1 hour ago by zurew