Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
enchanted

The left is uncomfortable with the past and the future.

10 posts in this topic

When Ezra Klein recently interviewed Helen Lewis, they discussed reasons the left is losing. An interesting point was brought up about the aesthetic of the political parties. While the left is uncomfortable with the future and the past, MAGA on the other hand is embracing both and ruling in the present. 

The left projects this demotivating narrative that the past was racist, sexist, and colonial while the future is polluted/warming, controlled by evil AI, and jobless. 

On the other hand MAGA romanticizes the past and embraces new technology (AI, Crypto, social media). 

I never heard this critique of the left before and it might actually have some merit. Could be a reason MAGA appeals to about half the voters. 

Edited by enchanted

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Leftists are just fucking lame to be honest. Beyond enforcing people's rights; they see nothing else

Edited by NewKidOnTheBlock

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, NewKidOnTheBlock said:

Leftists are just fucking lame to be honest. Beyond enforcing people's rights; they see nothing else

 thanks for your reply. Sounds like you're pretty disappointed in the left.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Here's a whole fascinating interview for anyone interested

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My impression is that many leftists are just a bit too ideological and groupthinky to have serious opinions on how to run a country. Complaining about bigotry and capitalism all day on Twitter isn't political, it's just a vibe. There's no strategy beyond expressing virtue. In order to be politically constructive, you can't be overly idealistic. A political leader needs to be fine with making decisions that will kill people. 

Edited by Basman

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, enchanted said:

The left projects this demotivating narrative that the past was racist, sexist, and colonial while the future is polluted/warming, controlled by evil AI, and jobless. 

On the other hand MAGA romanticizes the past and embraces new technology (AI, Crypto, social media). 

Of course.

Leftists are interesting in puncturing much of the self-deception around these things. While MAGA wants to preserve it.

That's the tension.

This is why leftists can be both right and naive. It's always why they lose.

Leftists have their own self-deception. 


"Finding your reason can be so deceiving, a subliminal place. 

I will not break, 'cause I've been riding the curves of these infinity words and so I'll be on my way. I will not stay.

 And it goes On and On, On and On"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This was the feminist who did one of the viral Jordan Peterson interviews back when he was on top of his game, and later got cancelled by the left for criticizing trans rights activists. Seems she learned nothing.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
45 minutes ago, Raze said:

This was the feminist who did one of the viral Jordan Peterson interviews back when he was on top of his game, and later got cancelled by the left for criticizing trans rights activists. Seems she learned nothing.

Can you clarify what she was supposed to learn? I'm not sure I follow. 

Edited by enchanted

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, aurum said:

Of course.

Leftists are interesting in puncturing much of the self-deception around these things. While MAGA wants to preserve it.

That's the tension.

This is why leftists can be both right and naive. It's always why they lose.

Leftists have their own self-deception. 

 Yes, brilliant. I really appreciate this thought provoking reply.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
25 minutes ago, enchanted said:

Can you clarify what she was supposed to learn? I'm not sure I follow. 

In just the parts I watched, she claims they moved away from facts because the facts were on her side, when she interviewed JBP he disputed her with multiple facts she had no response to, if anything this shows her side refused to engage with facts which shifted the opposition away from them.

She also largely dismisses the pushback against the culture and movements she promotes, meanwhile she experienced just 10% of the attacks from her side for a couple months that men have been getting for decades, and she melted down and talked about how frustrating it was.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0