Mellowmarsh

How did the ( Illusion ) the sense of separation start?

131 posts in this topic

Just now, Joseph Maynor said:

I was focusing on where you said you put a period on the discussion.  No worries.  Maybe it is a miscommunication.  

I meant his response did it, that theres nothing to add really, naturally


There is intelligence everywhere

– Some intelligence 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, Sugarcoat said:

I meant his response did it, that theres nothing to add really, naturally

Nothing to add but your response.  That should be acknowledged.  Our response.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Joseph Maynor said:

Nothing to add but your response.  That should be acknowledged.  Our response.

Can't keep yapping forever u know 

 


There is intelligence everywhere

– Some intelligence 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 05/06/2026 at 0:34 PM, Leo Gura said:

Infinity/God has no start or end.

Infinity never starts! That's the Beauty of Infinity. That's how God solved the problem of getting something from nothing. Infinity is the one and only thing that doesn't need a start and doesn't have an end.

Indeed, this one and only thing is infinite, thus is impossible to be separated. 

Infinity looking for the start of itself would be like the content of consciousness looking for consciousness. There’s no way to traverse the content of consciousness from consciousness, it’s one continuous seamless flow, from source to source.

Paradoxically, infinity is impossible to be known without the apparent separation that appears as the observer / observed , albeit illusory. 

As this one and only thing cannot be divided from its own essence without ceasing to be what it is. 
This one and only thing "one" or “ infinity” can never truly be separated from itself. Because a thing is identical to itself by definition, absolute separation is a logical impossibility.


 

Grief is Love with Nowhere to Go 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
50 minutes ago, Mellowmarsh said:

Indeed, this one and only thing is infinite, thus is impossible to be separated. 

Infinity looking for the start of itself would be like the content of consciousness looking for consciousness. There’s no way to traverse the content of consciousness from consciousness, it’s one continuous seamless flow, from source to source.

Paradoxically, infinity is impossible to be known without the apparent separation that appears as the observer / observed , albeit illusory. 

As this one and only thing cannot be divided from its own essence without ceasing to be what it is. 
This one and only thing "one" or “ infinity” can never truly be separated from itself. Because a thing is identical to itself by definition, absolute separation is a logical impossibility.

Notice the impossible, no way, cannot in this communication.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, Joseph Maynor said:

Notice the impossible, no way, cannot in this communication.  

Mind the Gap. 

Im Possible. 
 

 Mind is known in this conception that is knower and known communication.
But that which is known knows nothing, because the mind is never seen, only known.

Closing gaps is the entrance to infinity. 


 

Grief is Love with Nowhere to Go 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 hours ago, Mellowmarsh said:

Closing gaps is the entrance to infinity. 

I've definitely closed some gaps in my day 


“Everything is honoured, but nothing matters.” — Eckhart Tolle.

"I have lived on the lip of insanity, wanting to know reasons, knocking on a door. It opens. I've been knocking from the inside." -- Rumi

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A book is a story with a beginning and an end. Many authors appear, but there’s only one reader of writing no one ever writ.

The story is inseparable from the book.

We perceive things. Labelling happens immediately, and then the stories start. It feels like the “I” is the controller. But is it really? Or is the “I” just another story?


 

Grief is Love with Nowhere to Go 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Reading the story, it seems that a great many things are done. Dragons are slain, villages are conquered. Yet, the one reading the story never actually moves anywhere or goes anywhere.


"The mystical is not how the world is, but that it is."
-Ludwig Wittgenstein

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, Osaid said:

Reading the story, it seems that a great many things are done. Dragons are slain, villages are conquered. Yet, the one reading the story never actually moves anywhere or goes anywhere.

Nice! 👌 


 

Grief is Love with Nowhere to Go 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now