Nemo28

How much you are conditioned by AI interactions?

6 posts in this topic

I feel like AI is engineering my thought processes too much to the point i am becoming mechanic and AI like. We are basically becoming like robots. Does anyone here share the same concern? I can't stand how ''correct'' chatgpt or conversational AI is! >_<

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is where personal agency must come into play.

Do not forget you possess sovereignty. A Human being is remarkably infused with wisdom. Inherent, intrinsic wisdom.  As if of the DNA itself. Genetic Code=foundation of all biology.

Meditation, contemplation, and general consciousness work can reveal.

Duty to share.

Edited by No1Here2c

"The untold want, by life and land ne'er granted,

Now, Voyager, sail thou forth to seek & find."     

- Walt Whitman

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Your own psyche holds more wisdom than any AI LLM which is available to you


"The untold want, by life and land ne'er granted,

Now, Voyager, sail thou forth to seek & find."     

- Walt Whitman

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I had an argument with AI about a maths problem the other day. The AI was wrong. AI's are not infallible gods, they are robots that make shit up. I actually had to rephrase my maths problem for it to get the right answer. It was useful for me to argue with it, to clarify my own thinking, but I was aware of how ridiculous the situation was. 

The problem is, is you don't know what you don't know. If an AI is spouting knowledge about things you don't know about, then what are you supposed to do with that other than believe it is correct? And the whole reason for talking to an AI is mostly to talk about things you don't know about. You see the problem.

What is needed, is AI training before using it and those AI companies should offer it.


The future can be real. The future can be again.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I ask AI for information. Is there anything wrong about that ? But I don’t learn from AI . but I just read books or watch lectures on YouTube . I only use ChatGPT to edit my posts on the forum and organize them a bit like editing the grammar or things like this . If I’m looking for a fact or information I ask AI and I don’t see anything wrong with that. What’s the difference between asking AI or asking Google or any search engine ? The AI itself uses the internet database to generate its response or where else would it collect information from ? Being overly sensitive against AI is also extreme just like the AI slop . So balance is key . 


 "When you get very serious about truth you accept your life situation exactly as it is. So much so that you aren't childishly sitting around wishing it were otherwise.If you were confined to a wheelchair you would just accept it as how reality is. Just as you now just accept that you are not a bird who can fly."

-Leo Gura. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ai is like, mathematics for beginners, or something. No offense to anyone whos a die hard Ai programmer/enthusiast but its a conflation of "the map is the territory", where they acting like science/math = (ques., answer) equations for weights -> towards building blocks on top of the encoding scheme, this activation equation, that other equation,... Conflating all that w/ its functional and literally connotations. Its a means to an end, a way to organize or strip out language or a gooey image. There were other technologies like that before, whats that one where it was constructing faces out of animal faces, ®Braindream... or no it was Deepdream .tech or something, where it filled in animal parts and put all these faces in places it recognized as faces, like a highly repetitive vers., of Ai: This -> Deeply Artificial Trees, thats what i called it, lol

 

 

Edited by kavaris

Paraphrase from Poimandres (Corpus Hermeticum): "... that which is in the Word is also in ourselves."

Greek Magical Papyri (PGM): "I call upon the Word of the All, that which binds heaven and earth, and let it manifest in the circle."

Plato – Cratylus (439–440): "A name is a likeness of the thing itself; if rightly spoken, it carries the essence of what it names."

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now