Solipsism as a hallmark of consciousness

[Willy Phallicus]

7 hours ago, Nemra said:

I tried to say that reality can't always be limited to human experience, however, it is limited to human experience at the time being, because human experience is actual.

I wasn't aiming at you specifically, just building off your post.  My apologies if that wasn't clear.  Whatever it is you're experiencing is the totality be it it the limited human perspective or the I AM, that's all that's all that's going on.

3 hours ago, GodisOne said:

"look again"......any individual that looks again will be looking through the lens of duality. There is NO SUCH THING as looking through the lens of the Absolute, because it is NOT a perspective. Therefore, all you can be aware of is the illusion, which is the world of relativity. And that is why I mentioned solipsism is a false idea as it doesn't acknowledge the "other", which is necessary if you acknowledge "me".

The Absolute cannot be seen or known. All there is is the Absolute.

How can you not know what you are made of?  It is you and you are it so certainly you have some gnowledge of it.  You can know beyond any and all doubt.  

The only real major hurdle is circumventing the ego.  Most call it ego death but it is more accurately total ego submission.  Whether bound to your human ego or hovering over the edge of the dream that voice in your head is the voice of God and that's the only voice there is, ever has been or ever will be.  So when I say 'look again beyond choronzon (ego)' that's what I mean.  When the veil has been lifted it becomes plenty obvious to the observer that they are the recipient, the gift and the giver.  Little you steps aside and Big you takes over and there is zero doubt about what you are experiencing and what is being revealed.  

Whether people want to give it credit or not, 'absolute solipsism', however inadequate, is just as good a way to describe I Am as anything else there is.  People have some kind of intellectual hurdles they can't (or refuse too) get over or around so they opt for denial instead.  Or they lack the intestinal fortitude.

Im not some hardcore solipsist but as the OP sorta notes if you are totally against solipsism as an idea you're further away from the truth than someone who accepts it.  God is lonely and bored and his existence is essentially meaningless and we are here so he can escape all of that through us.  The big giggle here is you are arguing with yourself over a word you created to serve as a guide or means of expression and for some reason you want to doubt its sincerity.  

So go ahead and doubt it, God doesn't care.  This is all a ride, that's the genius of it.

 

Edited Saturday at 05:20 PM by Willy Phallicus

[moonawakening444]

On 02/04/2026 at 8:12 PM, Inliytened1 said:

Its really simple.  Everyone is right here.  Absolute and relative is also a duality that can collapse!   It can be realized (don't believe me) that this field of Consciousness..this..right now..is all that exists.  You're not really a human its just a field of Consciousness imagining it is a human and that there are other humans with their own minds and that you are a biological creature with his own mind.  Thats all an illusion.  It is just Mind. One Mind or a single field of Consciousness and this is it.  There is nothing behind the scenes.  Nothing needs to be. That simply needs to be imagined by this Consciousness. 

So..to say your grandmother isnt having her own experience right now is accurate., but at the same time you as her grandson also are not having your own experience.  "Your own" , your suggests a you and a me. A self and other.  There is just Experience.   Just like there is really no perception or perceiver there is just Being or Isness.

No self is really the initial awakening one can have but no other is also an awakening one can have.  

Is this Solipsism?  That's just a word. But the point is that tbis thing..this Consciousness right now..is all there is.  From this one Consciousness everything "else" can be created.  A universe..galaxies.  People, places, things.  And a you! 😀 All of that is the backstory.   

🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏

i know it´s all just word games, but why would Consciousness imagine such a real dream?

Edited Monday at 06:24 AM by moonawakening444

[Carl-Richard]

On 3.4.2026 at 1:12 AM, Inliytened1 said:

So..to say your grandmother isnt having her own experience right now is accurate., but at the same time you as her grandson also are not having your own experience.

Careful not to be too diplomatic here: they will agree with the former (on the level of words), but not the latter (unless they flipflop because they don't know the difference or are incoherent in their speech which absolutely does happen), which is the entire issue. Rewarding someone for saying what is seemingly right on the level of words but not on the level of concept (being "right" for the wrong reasons) is a punishment in disguise. You are not right if you think it's Absolute truth that your grandmother is a zombie because you're supposedly the only limited being that has an experience.

Edited Monday at 07:55 AM by Carl-Richard

[Nemo28]

On 02/04/2026 at 9:09 AM, Carl-Richard said:

I believe "other" is a concept. I believe "exist" is a concept. I believe "don't exist" is a concept. None of it is actual in the absolute sense. To pose that other minds exist or don't exist, it's philosophy, it's stuff you think about. But what "is" irrespective of thinking? That's what the Absolute is.

Thats what Buddha said
But, yeah this saves the day. 

[Nemo28]

On 03/04/2026 at 2:12 AM, Inliytened1 said:

Its really simple.  Everyone is right here.  Absolute and relative is also a duality that can collapse!   It can be realized (don't believe me) that this field of Consciousness..this..right now..is all that exists.  You're not really a human its just a field of Consciousness imagining it is a human and that there are other humans with their own minds and that you are a biological creature with his own mind.  Thats all an illusion.  It is just Mind. One Mind or a single field of Consciousness and this is it.  There is nothing behind the scenes.  Nothing needs to be. That simply needs to be imagined by this Consciousness. 

So..to say your grandmother isnt having her own experience right now is accurate., but at the same time you as her grandson also are not having your own experience.  "Your own" , your suggests a you and a me. A self and other.  There is just Experience.   Just like there is really no perception or perceiver there is just Being or Isness.

No self is really the initial awakening one can have but no other is also an awakening one can have.  

Is this Solipsism?  That's just a word. But the point is that tbis thing..this Consciousness right now..is all there is.  From this one Consciousness everything "else" can be created.  A universe..galaxies.  People, places, things.  And a you! 😀 All of that is the backstory.   

You are bringing Absolute into relative domain. As someone said earlier, you don't bring Sun in the caves with shadows on the walls. Nothing can be said about the Absolute other than - existence is.

[UnbornTao]

On 4/3/2026 at 11:42 PM, Osaid said:

Sorry to invalidate your Absolute Last Thursday awakening. Please don't send your mob of angry Last Thursdayists after me. 

Don't worry - they're not angry, they're insane. 😊

[JoshB]

On 3/31/2026 at 7:09 PM, Loveeee said:

When someone talks about spirituality, I automatically try and determine if the person believes in other minds

If they do, they're too lost in imagination for my taste, not realizing that God is you, nothing more, nothing less

If they don't they've got my attention 

I hope I have your attention I'm you / your mind (;

The only true assessment of God, is how Conscious you are of yourself

Edited Monday at 04:03 PM by JoshB

[GodisOne]

On 4/4/2026 at 6:16 PM, Willy Phallicus said:

How can you not know what you are made of?  It is you and you are it so certainly you have some gnowledge of it.  You can know beyond any and all doubt.  

The only real major hurdle is circumventing the ego.  Most call it ego death but it is more accurately total ego submission.  Whether bound to your human ego or hovering over the edge of the dream that voice in your head is the voice of God and that's the only voice there is, ever has been or ever will be.  So when I say 'look again beyond choronzon (ego)' that's what I mean.  When the veil has been lifted it becomes plenty obvious to the observer that they are the recipient, the gift and the giver.  Little you steps aside and Big you takes over and there is zero doubt about what you are experiencing and what is being revealed.  

Whether people want to give it credit or not, 'absolute solipsism', however inadequate, is just as good a way to describe I Am as anything else there is.  People have some kind of intellectual hurdles they can't (or refuse too) get over or around so they opt for denial instead.  Or they lack the intestinal fortitude.

Im not some hardcore solipsist but as the OP sorta notes if you are totally against solipsism as an idea you're further away from the truth than someone who accepts it.  God is lonely and bored and his existence is essentially meaningless and we are here so he can escape all of that through us.  The big giggle here is you are arguing with yourself over a word you created to serve as a guide or means of expression and for some reason you want to doubt its sincerity.  

So go ahead and doubt it, God doesn't care.  This is all a ride, that's the genius of it.

 

If there is only one thing, and you are part of that one thing, how could you know that one thing? You would have to stand apart from that one thing, point at it to be able to know it, but the problem is you cannot stand apart from it, because you are also it. For that reason, I said you cannot know the Absolute, nor look through the lens of the Absolute. The Absolute remains the Unknown. What you can know is that it is Unknown.

On to solipsism. Solipsism is not "I am". Solipsism is "I alone am". The problem with that, is in the world of relativity, for anything to be described, its opposite must exist. Like "up" cannot be understood without "down". So to say "I" exists without its opposite the "other" is violating the law of opposites. It is only when people become so self-centered that they think they alone exist, and the irony is that they think "if you are totally against solipsism as an idea you're further away from the truth than someone who accepts it", not realizing they are admitting there are OTHER people who don't accept it. So they say there are no "others", then they say there "other" people who don't accept solipsism. Self-contradiction at its best. 

Stick to logic and science my friend. Otherwise, you fall into delusion.

Edited Tuesday at 06:01 PM by GodisOne

[Willy Phallicus]

‘Other’ is not an admission, it’s the complete and utter lack of a viable alternative when it comes to discussing divine unity and wholeness in the world of appearances and polarities.  

The part of God that knows is talking to the part of God that doubts or doesn’t know at all.  In the third dimension that takes on the appearance of two (or more) separate individuals hashing it out on an internet forum. 

[moonawakening444]

On 03/04/2026 at 9:08 PM, Willy Phallicus said:

Reality isn't veiled, its our eyes.

🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯

[Willy Phallicus]

"If the doors of perception were cleansed every thing would appear to man as it is, infinite." ~ William Blake

[Loveeee]

4 hours ago, GodisOne said:

So they say there are no "others", then they say there "other" people who don't accept solipsism. Self-contradiction at its best. 

You can talk about characters in a dream while realizing it's all a dream, you can even talk to them ! 

[GodisOne]

7 hours ago, Willy Phallicus said:

‘Other’ is not an admission, it’s the complete and utter lack of a viable alternative when it comes to discussing divine unity and wholeness in the world of appearances and polarities.  

The part of God that knows is talking to the part of God that doubts or doesn’t know at all.  In the third dimension that takes on the appearance of two (or more) separate individuals hashing it out on an internet forum. 

You don't need "other" when speaking of divine unity. But you need "other" when speaking of "I". And that is why solipsism, which holds that "I alone exist" does not hold any ground, because its opposite "other" is needed to contrast and give meaning to the "I". And this I have said multiple times.

"The part of God that knows is talking to the part of God that doubts or doesn’t know at all."

that knows what? "knowing" belongs to duality only, as it requires the knower and the known. Duality is an illusion.

Edited 22 hours ago by GodisOne

[GodisOne]

3 hours ago, Loveeee said:

You can talk about characters in a dream while realizing it's all a dream, you can even talk to them ! 

Yes, the dream may appear, but it always appears with "I" and its objects, codependently. Not "I" by itself, as mentioned in solipsism. 

The dream is nothing more than the Absolute appearing as the dream. All there is is the Absolute.

[Loveeee]

2 hours ago, GodisOne said:

Not "I" by itself, as mentioned in solipsism. 

"I" is the dream and there's nothing else, your current experience is all there is to reality ever, that's Absolute Solipsism 

[GodisOne]

58 minutes ago, Loveeee said:

"I" is the dream and there's nothing else, your current experience is all there is to reality ever, that's Absolute Solipsism 

Look at the contradiction. You say "I" is the dream; then "your" current experience is reality. If "I" is a dream, how can something that belongs to that "I" be real?
Note your other contradiction: you specifically said earlier it's a dream with different characters, and now it's reality?

Your viewpoint sounds confused.

Edited 19 hours ago by GodisOne

[Loveeee]

23 minutes ago, GodisOne said:

Look at the contradiction. You say "I" is the dream; then "your" current experience is reality. If "I" is a dream, how can something that belongs to that "I" be real?

Words are pointers, it's not "your" experience, it's not even "experience", it's THIS

26 minutes ago, GodisOne said:

Note your other contradiction: you specifically said earlier it's a dream with different characters, and now it's reality?

Reality is a dream yes, it's consciousness 

[Mellowmarsh]

Because you cannot prove oneness is proof of oneness.

[Willy Phallicus]

5 hours ago, GodisOne said:

"I alone exist" does not hold any ground, because its opposite "other"

Opposites, like negative and positive, are the same thing just on either end of the pole.  Same goes for one and many.  

It cannot be grasped, only realized.

[Carl-Richard]

I think if we start bringing back the Stages of Enlightenment models to the forum, these problems of solipsism won't arise, because 1. they don't contain solipsism, and 2. it's harder to deceive yourself (but not impossible) about the stages (especially the Shakti-Shiva progression models, i.e. self-realization, God consciousness, Unity Consciousness). It's harder to deceive yourself about concrete things like presence of shakti in the body or in the spine. And it's harder to get lost in conceptual stories when the models are only reliant on the interplay between shakti (dynamic energy) and shiva (pure being).

Edited 16 hours ago by Carl-Richard