Posted 4 hours ago (edited) @Elliottcommon sense the highest divisions will make all the money and the lower divisions will dissolve into just playing with eachother. Teams with woman on them will receive no funding and will dissolve into nothing and now there are no womans sports. The highest divisions will have 1 woman on the team thats on the sidelines the entire time. Your arguments are counter logic and dont make any sense for having the highest competitiveness. Again its woman hate. The divisions exist so woman can play sports your arguments lead to woman having no competitiveness between themselves because you want to be a woman. Everything would naturally just go back to people watching 80 percent black men and 20 percent white men with 1 woman on each team sitting there doing nothing. Your common sense isnt common its retard logic. If they let woman on the team because it has to be CO ED the woman wouldnt play. And when they played at the highest competetive level they would not do anything and they would be the token woman and everyone would make fun of them because they dont belong there. When they did come off the sidelines they would be severly more limited in their ability to play. Completely over powered by every other male. They would be severly disadvantaged and ultimately a detriment to the rest of the team. This is something you want. Because you want to be a woman. And all of this change because 1 percent of 1 percent of the population wants to play with woman in sports. Extremely selfish. Edited 4 hours ago by Hojo Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted 4 hours ago You cannot really use high school divisions as a case. Pre-puberty. It is far easier to fool someone, than to convince them they have been fooled. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted 4 hours ago (edited) 10 minutes ago, Hojo said: @Elliottcommon sense the highest divisions will make all the money and the lower divisions will dissolve into just playing with eachother. Teams with woman on them will receive no funding and will dissolve into nothing and now there are no womans sports. The highest divisions will have 1 woman on the team thats on the sidelines the entire time. Your arguments are counter logic and dont make any sense for having the highest competitiveness. Again its woman hate. The divisions exist so woman can play sports your arguments lead to woman having no competitiveness between themselves because you want to be a woman. Everything would naturally just go back to people watching 80 percent black men and 20 percent white men with 1 woman on each team sitting there doing nothing. Your common sense isnt common its retard logic. If they let woman on the team because it has to be CO ED the woman wouldnt play. And when they played at the highest competetive level they would not do anything and they would be the token woman and everyone would make fun of them because they dont belong there. When they did come off the sidelines they would be severly more limited in their ability to play. Completely over powered by every other male. They would be severly disadvantaged and ultimately a deteriment to the rest of the team. This is something you want. You agree wnba should make as much as nba players? Which high schools and colleges pay the athletes? UCLA https://s24dh101d5.humspace.ucla.edu Comparison of WNBA and NBA Salaries – Home Firstly, the salary range for WNBA players is between $60,000 and approximately $220,000, whereas NBA players' salaries range from $5 million to $50 million Edited 4 hours ago by Elliott 2 Samuel (16) :22 https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=2 Samuel 16%3A22&version=NIV Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted 4 hours ago (edited) @ElliottNo i dont think they should. But they should get a chance to make something. So we created the womans division. I have no idea who pays who. Its not relevant. If the woman were competitively better than the men, they should. But they arent. In your universe they get nothing and cant even play. Or we sacrifice the integrity of male competitiveness so that men can play with 1 token woman on each team. Edited 4 hours ago by Hojo Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted 4 hours ago Just now, Hojo said: I have no idea who pays who. Its not relevant. They don't get paid. How the fuck isn't it relevant if your ENTIRE fucking premise is that they won't get paid? 2 Samuel (16) :22 https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=2 Samuel 16%3A22&version=NIV Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted 4 hours ago (edited) @Elliott They dont make any money? My premise is they will make 0 dollars. You are trying to take away what they make cause there will be 0 woman on any team. Or 1 woman on each team. Whether they get paid or not is not relevant to whom pays them. Common sense bro. They make more because thats how much people are willing to pay to watch peak human performance. Being 2nd to top performance is that much value that people want to see. You are arguing to destroy this. Edited 4 hours ago by Hojo Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted 4 hours ago Just now, Hojo said: @Elliott They dont make any money? My premise is they will make 0 dollars. You are trying to take away what they make cause there will be 0 woman on any team. Or 1 woman on each team. High school and college is illegal to pay players. They just started this season paying division one ncaa basketball. 2 Samuel (16) :22 https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=2 Samuel 16%3A22&version=NIV Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted 4 hours ago (edited) We will have 3 or 4 divisions, 5. 6, 7, 8, for however many want to play, if a girl wants to play she'll play. And so will the 20% of boys that currently aren't allowed to play. People would watch lower division basketball like they watch wnba Edited 3 hours ago by Elliott 2 Samuel (16) :22 https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=2 Samuel 16%3A22&version=NIV Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted 4 hours ago (edited) @ElliottNo one is going to give them money to play. No one is going to care about them or watch them. They want to pay to watch peak performance not 115th in line for peak performance. The 2nd division will dissolve and they will have less and less woman and everything will go back to have 80 percent black men and 20 percent white men. The woman would go to the lower divisions and everything would revert to back to how it is now. Except now woman make 0 dollars. Edited 3 hours ago by Hojo Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted 3 hours ago 1 minute ago, Hojo said: @ElliottNo one is going to give them money to play. No one is going to care about them or watch them. They want to pay to watch peak performance not 115th in line for peak performance. So what? Anyone that currently watches wnba will watch any game with women in it, the more women playing the more will watch it(that currently watch wnba) common sense. 2 Samuel (16) :22 https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=2 Samuel 16%3A22&version=NIV Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted 3 hours ago (edited) @ElliottThey watch it because we divided them moron. Now we can watch peak female performance. If we didnt divide them we wouldnt see them they wouldnt get any money. You keep saying common sense that isnt common sense. Common sense is we divided them for fair play. Edited 3 hours ago by Hojo Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted 3 hours ago Imagine a woman beating men in basketball, people will watch. 2 Samuel (16) :22 https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=2 Samuel 16%3A22&version=NIV Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted 3 hours ago (edited) 1 minute ago, Hojo said: @ElliottThey watch it because we divided them moron. Now we can watch peak female performance. If we didnt divide them we wouldnt see them they wouldnt get any money. The lower division would be all women, genius. You watch wnba? Edited 3 hours ago by Elliott 2 Samuel (16) :22 https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=2 Samuel 16%3A22&version=NIV Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted 3 hours ago @ElliottI know you hate woman. You want to watch them get hurt. Its not funny to a normal human. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted 3 hours ago @Hojo you watch wnba? 2 Samuel (16) :22 https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=2 Samuel 16%3A22&version=NIV Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted 3 hours ago @ElliottI only watch competitive league of legends. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted 3 hours ago (edited) 6 minutes ago, Hojo said: @ElliottI know you hate woman. You want to watch them get hurt. Its not funny to a normal human. ABC7 Los Angeles https://abc7.com No fluke: Maine girl beats boys to win 2nd straight state wrestling title Feb 22, 2024 — 17-year-old Maddie Ripley defended her crown over the weekend when she defeated three boys in one day. She's won back-to-back high school Edited 3 hours ago by Natasha Tori Maru 2 Samuel (16) :22 https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=2 Samuel 16%3A22&version=NIV Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted 3 hours ago (edited) @ElliottWe are talking about highest competitive level retard not fking high school. Why are you talking about high school? I never said a woman cant beat a man in a sport. Once you reach top 30-20 percent of men theres no competition woman can have. And people pay money to watch that. Thats why they make more money. If you take it apart we stop getting better. We evolve in sports because men compete against men and woman compete against woman. A top tie athlete now is way better than a top tier athlete 200 years ago and we keep getting better and better because males compete against themsleves. If you suddenly make these men compete against woman we would stop achieving more and more because its not fair and there is no competition. All because you want to beat up a woman to feel special. Edited 3 hours ago by Hojo Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted 58 minutes ago Locking this. Any other Mod or Leo feel free to open it if you please. It has devolved into a shit-fight and isn't going anywhere constructive. It is far easier to fool someone, than to convince them they have been fooled. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites