integral

The "do-er" perspective

4 posts in this topic

I've been practising commanding myself to do things as if it's separate "it" object autonomous AI.

The perspective is you're watching yourself then you command the thing "you" to do something like, "relax" or "do this".

Basically, you're commanding the puppet and the puppet has no autonomy it just obeys.

And this allows the puppet to do things that it doesn't want to do effortlessly without any free will.

There's also no experience of "doing" there's only a do-er.

The Do-er does things automaticly, and the watcher nudges it in the right direction like talking to a pet.

The commander always knows what to do, no thinking needed. The puppet is told to think, when its done thinking the commander knows what to do next with the puppet. 

The commander is the pure higher self. The commander points to do what is true and wise. 

 

Probably no one's gonna respond to this, sharing random thoughts. lol

Edited by integral

How is this post just me acting out my ego in the usual ways? Is this post just me venting and justifying my selfishness? Are the things you are posting in alignment with principles of higher consciousness and higher stages of ego development? Are you acting in a mature or immature way? Are you being selfish or selfless in your communication? Are you acting like a monkey or like a God-like being?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
35 minutes ago, integral said:

I've been practising commanding myself to do things as if it's separate "it" object autonomous AI.

The perspective is you're watching yourself then you command the thing "you" to do something like, "relax" or "do this".

Basically, you're commanding the puppet and the puppet has no autonomy it just obeys.

And this allows the puppet to do things that it doesn't want to do effortlessly without any free will.

There's also no experience of "doing" there's only a do-er.

The Do-er does things automaticly, and the watcher nudges it in the right direction like talking to a pet.

The commander always knows what to do, no thinking needed. The puppet is told to think, when its done thinking the commander knows what to do next with the puppet. 

The commander is the pure higher self. The commander points to do what is true and wise. 

 

Probably no one's gonna respond to this, sharing random thoughts. lol

It's good as an experiment, but doesn't sound like a good idea to me, it will breed some kind of conflict inevitably.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 6.1.2026 at 4:05 AM, integral said:

I've been practising commanding myself to do things as if it's separate "it" object autonomous AI.

The perspective is you're watching yourself then you command the thing "you" to do something like, "relax" or "do this".

Basically, you're commanding the puppet and the puppet has no autonomy it just obeys.

And this allows the puppet to do things that it doesn't want to do effortlessly without any free will.

There's also no experience of "doing" there's only a do-er.

The Do-er does things automaticly, and the watcher nudges it in the right direction like talking to a pet.

The commander always knows what to do, no thinking needed. The puppet is told to think, when its done thinking the commander knows what to do next with the puppet. 

The commander is the pure higher self. The commander points to do what is true and wise. 

 

Probably no one's gonna respond to this, sharing random thoughts. lol

John C Lilly. 

Programming and metaprogramming. 


Here are smart words that present my apparent identity but don't mean anything. At all. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now