AION

White House roadmap says Europe may be 'unrecognizable' in 20 years as migration

31 posts in this topic

1 minute ago, Elliott said:

Race is made up, it's bizarre.

Ethic group, call it as you want.

1 minute ago, Elliott said:

No 2 humans are the same, you can divide people into endless groups, and you can argue over 'who's white'.

Of course individually most Black or Arab people are as approachable as anyone else.

But collectively they are less so whatever the cause (genetics, culture and collective unconscious in general...), they commit more crimes and offenses, and people don't want to see their city ethnically replaced anyway because white people are too neurotic and impoverished to have children and because their city is full of migrants.

But there's no racism here, it's not a question of hostility but simply of atavism.


En Dieu nous croyons

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Schizophonia said:

Ethic group, call it as you want.

Of course individually most Black or Arab people are as approachable as anyone else.

But collectively they are less so whatever the cause (genetics, culture and collective unconscious in general...), they commit more crimes and offenses, and people don't want to see their city ethnically replaced anyway because white people are too neurotic and impoverished to have children and because their city is full of migrants.

But there's no racism here, it's not a question of hostility but simply of atavism.

Not exactly sure what you mean. How would an ethnic minority change a different ethnic group?

 

 

 

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 12/10/2025 at 9:34 PM, AION said:

https://www.foxnews.com/world/white-house-roadmap-europe-unrecognizable-20-years-migration-raises-doubts-us-allies

This is such a projection. I think the US will be unrecognisable in 20 years considering the culture clash. The White House says EU won't exist in 20 years but I think the US won't exist in its current form.

Sad thing is when I go there I see more beggars if refugee status on the streets than I do natives. It’s bad, the culture is dying. I do not feel safe when I visit Europe.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, kray said:

Sad thing is when I go there I see more beggars if refugee status on the streets than I do natives. It’s bad, the culture is dying. I do not feel safe when I visit Europe.

Homelessness is in every country on the planet.

Did you just see that video I posted on the mole people of Las Vegas? They are in Brazil, Europe, China, Russia, America, Africa, Asia everywhere. America's insane way of dealing with it is to throw them in jail, as if that gives anything a solution.

Its bad because the economy is garbage at the minute, because people are ripping the world order apart, the thing that gave everyone wealth through specialisation of their economies, to build some multipolar disney dream. Wherever everyone works together in lala land, or you know, in reality just bombs each other because they look different, and decides their nations can do it all alone. 

Edited by BlueOak

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, kray said:

Sad thing is when I go there I see more beggars if refugee status on the streets than I do natives. It’s bad, the culture is dying. I do not feel safe when I visit Europe.

Ahaha the US has literally neighborhoods that look like cities only made of homeless people. I wouldn’t feel safe in the US. 

This is unimaginable in Europe

Again this is projection by Americans. The US is a dying empire. It is full with degenerates and perverts. Just like with Roman Empire degeneration caused the collapse. 

The worst part of the US is that everybody has guns and everybody hates each other. So when shit hits the fan in the US it will be a purge. 


It is time to become timeless

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The Europe of today will be different in 20 years for sure. But depends what their talking about - power, cohesion of Euro nations, or ''ethnic aesthetic'' due to migration and low native birth rate - or all the above which can be tied together. By the end of the century its possible the natives could be a minority at a national level - and most definitely at a urban level in major cities. The catch 22 is low native birth rates needed to be compensated by migration - but migration is now becoming contested - yet is still required because the current math just doesn't math - you can't sustain a inverted demographic pyramid where you have more dependents (retired elderly) than those that provide the tax base for them (youthful workers).

The other issue is assimilation vs parallel societies being created. Also, are these migrants or communities distinctly different to the host nation? For Europe much them can be due to majority of the migration from Africa/Middle East. Islam is also a very strong and distinct identity that doesn't dilute so easily - especially if the host country doesn't have a strong counter identity to assimilate them into their own ''norms''in the first place. Some people will assimilate but others won't - its everything in between. But this can eventually end up having a effect on the institutions of that country in the long run, including its core values being challenged. What happens when you eventually have haram police shaming only fans models or Bonnie Blue lol she just got away easy by being banned from Bali: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cdxe42w2j0lo instead of jailed.

Just by the sheer scale and numbers - European or Westerners are a minority on the planet - and it's their region which is melding into a melting pot. The other regions will remain distinctly their own culturally / civilizationally because of lack of alternative cultures or people mixing into them to the same degree. Africa will remain Africa, China Chinese and India Indian. South America - South American - it's already very mixed itself - maybe that's Europe's future - EuroBrazil with Muslim characteristics instead of Brazillian but lifts and bikini culture. It would be a shame to lose a distinctive European culture and identity also - which isn't racist but just as a appreciation for having diversity in a true macro sense of another ''civilization'' to enjoy with its own distinctive culture.

Other places are threatened by consumerism and globalized homogeneity but not in  the same way. Like we can still go to Japan and sure we'll see Mcdonald's and glass buildings etc but the wider container is still very Japanese. Same with India or even UAE for example. There's still a very strong dominant culture. I think the West diluted away their identity (various reasons) and didn't bend the newcomers coming in to that core identity - not in a uniform way but just as a bare minimum to ''fit in''. 

Rome absorbed foreigners but glorified Rome. Ottomans integrated diversity but centered around Ottoman primacy. Americans integrated migrants while mythologising what it is to be American. I've noticed when asking American's where they're from they lead with nationality vs ancestry which is what ethnic Europeans or Brits usually lead with or include in defining themselves. They say ''I'm British Indian-Chinese-etc'' while Americans simply say ''I'm American'' then require a follow up asking about their ''background''. Europe seems to have lost it's center.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, zazen said:

The Europe of today will be different in 20 years for sure. But depends what their talking about - power, cohesion of Euro nations, or ''ethnic aesthetic'' due to migration and low native birth rate - or all the above which can be tied together. By the end of the century its possible the natives could be a minority at a national level - and most definitely at a urban level in major cities. The catch 22 is low native birth rates needed to be compensated by migration - but migration is now becoming contested - yet is still required because the current math just doesn't math - you can't sustain a inverted demographic pyramid where you have more dependents (retired elderly) than those that provide the tax base for them (youthful workers).

The other issue is assimilation vs parallel societies being created. Also, are these migrants or communities distinctly different to the host nation? For Europe much them can be due to majority of the migration from Africa/Middle East. Islam is also a very strong and distinct identity that doesn't dilute so easily - especially if the host country doesn't have a strong counter identity to assimilate them into their own ''norms''in the first place. Some people will assimilate but others won't - its everything in between. But this can eventually end up having a effect on the institutions of that country in the long run, including its core values being challenged. What happens when you eventually have haram police shaming only fans models or Bonnie Blue lol she just got away easy by being banned from Bali: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cdxe42w2j0lo instead of jailed.

Just by the sheer scale and numbers - European or Westerners are a minority on the planet - and it's their region which is melding into a melting pot. The other regions will remain distinctly their own culturally / civilizationally because of lack of alternative cultures or people mixing into them to the same degree. Africa will remain Africa, China Chinese and India Indian. South America - South American - it's already very mixed itself - maybe that's Europe's future - EuroBrazil with Muslim characteristics instead of Brazillian but lifts and bikini culture. It would be a shame to lose a distinctive European culture and identity also - which isn't racist but just as a appreciation for having diversity in a true macro sense of another ''civilization'' to enjoy with its own distinctive culture.

Other places are threatened by consumerism and globalized homogeneity but not in  the same way. Like we can still go to Japan and sure we'll see Mcdonald's and glass buildings etc but the wider container is still very Japanese. Same with India or even UAE for example. There's still a very strong dominant culture. I think the West diluted away their identity (various reasons) and didn't bend the newcomers coming in to that core identity - not in a uniform way but just as a bare minimum to ''fit in''. 

Rome absorbed foreigners but glorified Rome. Ottomans integrated diversity but centered around Ottoman primacy. Americans integrated migrants while mythologising what it is to be American. I've noticed when asking American's where they're from they lead with nationality vs ancestry which is what ethnic Europeans or Brits usually lead with or include in defining themselves. They say ''I'm British Indian-Chinese-etc'' while Americans simply say ''I'm American'' then require a follow up asking about their ''background''. Europe seems to have lost it's center.

 

I'd argue the world is the melting pot. Every culture in the world is changing and being westernized.

 

 

 

Edited by Elliott

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Let's play out this segregation idea.

 

Europe is not going to grow, Canada and U.S. will, but that's it.

The rest of the world will grow a ton - in this segregated racist world. Eventually, in this segregated racist world either A.) we de-segregate, or B.) The likelihood is that whites, being the ones that are structuring the racist world, will be overthrown and likely decimated in the process, losing territory and numbers.

 

Let's take a look back at option (A) now and try to think that through. The world is westernizing, the world is happy to follow the liberal west, the whole world has equity in it. The rest of the world develops creating new areas for immigrants to go and eliminating the need for immigration altogether. Immigration becomes about sub-cultures instead of needs, probably creating a flourishing effect of atavism for sub-cultures but in a peaceful world.  AND whites become a diaspora in the rest of the world.

 

 

 

 

 

You want to keep the world the same. For how long do you think we should do that, FOREVER? The next 1,000 years??

 

Inbreed! To INFINITY! AND BEYOND!!!!

 

What does it say about the white 'super-race' that they don't recognize that humans are a sexual species precisely for diversification, ergo evolution.

 

Edited by Elliott

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm literally listening to a podcast right now about how Russia's endgame is Europe: 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 hours ago, zazen said:

mythologising what it is to be American

What do you have against hotdogs and hamburgers?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now