James123

Talking to Atheist

93 posts in this topic

James you can’t assert Leo doesn’t know what he’s talking about without asserting James doesn’t know what he’s talking about.

Or maybe there’s just talking ( noise) appearing, heard as the same subject topic, but being heard in many different ways as there are translations.
 

It’s all just this known auditory illusion of light and sound. The illusion is known because illusion cannot be not known. 
There’s no sound without silence, and vice versa, both are contingent upon the other to exist. 
 


 
 


 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
18 minutes ago, Mellowmarsh said:

This is just more not-knowing truth claims. It’s arriving at the clarity of not-knowing knowing.

You’ve never known death. Death is unknowable. Life is not- knowing knowing, that which is unknown, not unknowable, as that which is unknown will eventually become known. But that which is unknowable can never be known.

Are you not alive first, knowing death ? Or are you dead first, knowing life?

 

What’s the difference, except as the same appearance, appearing different?

 

What came first the chicken or the egg?

I died. Body is it's own. 

That's enlightenment.

just follow Leo at the beginning. He is stuck within experiencing. 

Body is with entire universe, cosmos, existence. Yet You are none. 

Anything and everything arises falls within You, yet You are none.

Peace.


"It is impossible for a man to learn what he thinks he already knows."

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 minutes ago, James123 said:

I died. Body is it's own. 

That's enlightenment.

just follow Leo at the beginning. He is stuck within experiencing. 

Body is with entire universe, cosmos, existence. Yet You are none. 

Anything and everything arises falls within You, yet You are none.

Peace.

I disagree that Leo is stuck. Leo asserts very well that experience is all there is and that no one is experiencing experience.

Leo is talking about the exact same thing you’re talking about. It’s just different that’s all, it’s all just the same difference where there is no difference. The same one Love action dreaming difference where there is none.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
27 minutes ago, James123 said:

I died. Body is it's own. 

That's enlightenment.

just follow Leo at the beginning. He is stuck within experiencing. 

Body is with entire universe, cosmos, existence. Yet You are none. 

Anything and everything arises falls within You, yet You are none.

Peace.

It’s like you are saying that everything arises from death and falls to death.

Everything comes from death and returns to death. And death is God.

The body being the thing that is the rotting corpse of God.

Paraphrasing the German philosopher “Philip Mainlander” who too committed suicide along with his God.

 

R.I.P. 
 

Peace. 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, Mellowmarsh said:

It’s like you are saying that everything arises from death and falls to death.

Everything comes from death and returns to death. And death is God.

The body being the thing that is the rotting corpse of God.

Paraphrasing the German philosopher “Philip Mainlander” who too committed suicide along with his God.

 

R.I.P. 
 

Peace. 

 

I would like to add one more thing.

The reason why we are talking or breathing is love.

Love can not be experienced separately, but you die for Truth, then, body, environment, moment becomes love.

That's the all purpose of creation.

Surrender, die before you die.

Don't resist. Do not hold even a single knowledge, experience. Disseappear, let go what makes you you, let go all.

Be free, flow.

Let the body dance with existence.

Peace.


"It is impossible for a man to learn what he thinks he already knows."

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, Mellowmarsh said:

Leo asserts very well that experience is all there is and that no one is experiencing experience.

What we call experience is the flow of change taking a dual form, a self-preserving system within another system in constant flux.

The self-preserving system we call life divides change into events to orient itself. This is experience, but ultimate reality is what makes that constant change inevitable, not change itself.

Change is manifestation; the essence of change is limitlessness. Limitlessness is reality; change is the relative movement that inevitably appears within it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
30 minutes ago, Breakingthewall said:

What we call experience is the flow of change taking a dual form, a self-preserving system within another system in constant flux.

The self-preserving system we call life divides change into events to orient itself. This is experience, but ultimate reality is what makes that constant change inevitable, not change itself.

Change is manifestation; the essence of change is limitlessness. Limitlessness is reality; change is the relative movement that inevitably appears within it.

But is change the fabric of reality or is it just the now. The present moment and everything else is just the mind.  You are that now but you're Infinity so u must step outside of yourself to imagine other.  That is change. 

Edited by Inliytened1

 

Wisdom.  Truth.  Love.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 minutes ago, Inliytened1 said:

But is change the fabric of reality or is it just the now.

Change is relationship, is the inevitable fluctuation that happens due the inherent Instability of unlimitedness. There cannot be a stable state without limits that contain it. 

20 minutes ago, Inliytened1 said:

You are that now but you're Infinity so u must step outside of yourself to imagine other.  That is change

Change happen without other, it's inevitable. "Other" happens Because relationships/vibrations/changes of state overlap in infinitely coherent patterns, creating dimensions upon dimensions, space, time, consciousness, universes upon universes.

"You" are not doing that "for" you are that. It is incredibly difficult to understand the absence of self from the perspective of the self. There is no center or intentionality; that would be limiting. There is an explosion of coherent relationships in all directions.

Seeing this is not enlightenment; perceiving from the human self what you essentially are, is. You are total openness. Anything else you perceive, such as a creator with intention, is a projection of the tensional energetic node we call the self.

But the point is not knowing that you are total openness, is perceiving now what total openness is. The human self is an eye of the absolute looking itself. It doesn't happen because the absolute "wants" but because there are not limits.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
33 minutes ago, Breakingthewall said:

Change is relationship, is the inevitable fluctuation that happens due the inherent Instability of unlimitedness. There cannot be a stable state without limits that contain it. 

 

But what is relationship? You struggle and will go in circles with words because of infinity or unlimitedness because you are trying to capture the Infinite with the finite.  What we can here is simply make pointers at the Absolute.   But change is imaginary.  Experience is imaginary because you are imagining experience right now. 

Edited by Inliytened1

 

Wisdom.  Truth.  Love.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Were you never an athiest?


Sometimes it's the journey itself that teaches/ A lot about the destination not aware of/No matter how far/
How you go/How long it may last/Venture life, burn your dread

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
27 minutes ago, Inliytened1 said:

But what is relationship?

Relationship means change. Any change is a relationship between states, a fluctuation. 

 

28 minutes ago, Inliytened1 said:

You struggle and will go in circles with words because of infinity or unlimitedness because you are trying to capture the Infinite with the finite

I don't think I'm struggling, just trying to transmit a vision. I'm not trying to capture, but understand the dynamic, it's different. 

29 minutes ago, Inliytened1 said:

What we can here is simply make pointers at the Absolute

Sure, try to see what im pointing. 

38 minutes ago, Inliytened1 said:

But change is imaginary.  Experience is imaginary because you are imagining experience right now. 

No, "you" are a human construct that implies a center. Reality is centerless. That is the challenge, not another. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now