on death

[Yimpa]

Death is experience beyond what you’re comfortable with. Just sit death iwith curiosity, you’ll discover that it was Mind all along.

Edited November 22 by Yimpa

[BuffaloBill]

Thing i've been wondering about is the difference between infinity, and nothingness. It seems like they're separate things but really they're not. A void of nothingness seems to be able to conjure up an infinite amount of new possibilities. So that's how things were before the big bang, it was all a void, then from that void something happened. If you take a game like Minecraft and put a seed into the creation of the world, it will be separate from any other kind of world that could've been generated. But before the world was created the possibilities were endless.

Also, after Death: what's not to say we get immediately reborn into a different dream. To me it seems illogical to experience non-existense for too long, as soon as death occurs you begin a new experience. Contrary to the belief that when you die you're dead forever and you'll never experience anything again, it's all black. Instead, the wait time is instant rather than eternal.

[Mellowmarsh]

You can witness your own bodies birth and death, and the birth and death of other bodies.

But you can never witness the birth and death of the witness. 

 

 

 

 

[Breakingthewall]

The most likely, if not almost certain, thing that happens when you die is reincarnation. But it's not you who is reincarnated; rather, a similar, related structural pattern emerges, building upon the previous one. There is no soul that changes incarnation, but rather a structure that emerges based on another. The point is that you are not you; you are the total unfathomable, not an individual nor an entity. So, when you die, another framework of possibilities simply begins.

[Someone here]

13 minutes ago, Breakingthewall said:

The point is that you are not you; you are the total unfathomable, not an individual nor an entity

Try to shift your focus on your feet and you will feel like you exist in your feet or you are the feet  . 

Try to focus on your stomach and you will feel that you are the stomach. You get the idea...

We feel we are the face or head because the sensation is focused upon it for most of the five senses : sight ..hear..taste ..smell..except  touch is spread all over the body equally. 

And there is a technology called sensory deprivation tanks where you basically erase your entire body out of consciousness but you still exist lol.

We like to poo poo "no self " and guys like VeganAwake but it's very liberating to discover you don't exist as a someone here . Because now you get to fuck up in life and use the excuse "well I'm not the doer ".

[Breakingthewall]

10 minutes ago, Someone here said:

And there is a technology called sensory deprivation tanks where you basically erase your entire body out of consciousness but you still exist lol.

It's not so simple. There always remains the observer, the witness to the experience. Even with high doses of psychedelics, it's still there. This observer creates a complete fracture, a duality. It's extremely difficult for it to fall. It seems to fall, then people say it's pure consciousness. Consciousness being conscious of something? Of something else? Always the fracture. God dreaming. Dreaming something? Illusion vs. reality, ego vs. non-dual consciousness. Fractures.

[Someone here]

5 minutes ago, Breakingthewall said:

It's not so simple. There always remains the observer, the witness to the experience. Even with high doses of psychedelics, it's still there. This observer creates a complete fracture, a duality. It's extremely difficult for it to fall. It seems to fall, then people say it's pure consciousness. Consciousness being conscious of something? Of something else? Always the fracture. God dreaming. Dreaming something? Illusion vs. reality, ego vs. non-dual consciousness. Fractures.

No there is literally no one reading this right now . That's  precisely the illusion of perception. Perception implies subject and object ..a perceived and a perceiver.  But you can't actually draw a line of where exactly is this perceiver. 

You think you are reading these words. .that's something the mind is adding. These words are just there. They are not being perceived or witnessed. They are there and there's nothing else . It's  mindfuckery but as you say "what can be done lol?".

[Yimpa]

On 11/18/2025 at 4:04 AM, BuffaloBill said:

praying to jesus so i dont accidently end up in hell, i mean i'd do it that's just the uh.....pascals wager thingy, you wanna be safe 

Hell is good. Being good is bad.

[Mellowmarsh]

[Yimpa]

Eternity is all there is. 

[Yimpa]

Death of ignorance will be a cosmic, orgasmic celebration.

[Yeah Yeah]

I’m hoping for the latter outcome — a state where I can consciously dream any dream I choose, with high intelligence and awareness. Not looping myself endlessly through some blissed-out white light, forgetting how grinding and difficult contrast can be, only to choose to do it all over again out of naïve positivity and end up back here.

I want to be deeply intelligent, to experience something like heaven freely, and maybe only later choose to lose myself again — like getting on a roller coaster by choice. Maybe this life is the result of that kind of amnesia: getting bored with total freedom and choosing limitation.

That’s my hope — not reincarnation driven by the state I die in, karmic lessons, or unfinished business.

This leans with Bashar, Leo Gura and Alan Watts 

The problem is lack of evidence or verification to which it is.

Leo however says I am imagining this life, and it's all imagination, yet he hasn't made a video about imagination itself or it's qualities and the dimensions of it, or it's possibilities - and have had a difficult time unlocking this god mode awakening without drugs. It's been a big claim yet difficult to self-actualize, so either it's false or I'm doing it wrong.

I’m hoping for the latter outcome — a state where I can consciously dream any dream I choose, with high intelligence and awareness. Not looping myself endlessly through some blissed-out white light, forgetting how grinding and difficult contrast can be, only to choose to do it all over again out of naïve positivity and end up back here.

I want to be deeply intelligent, to experience something like heaven freely, and maybe only later choose to lose myself again — like getting on a roller coaster by choice. Maybe this life is the result of that kind of amnesia: getting bored with total freedom and choosing limitation.

That’s my hope — not reincarnation driven by the state I die in, karmic lessons, or unfinished business.

This view broadly aligns with Bashar, Leo Gura, and Alan Watts.

The problem, however, is the lack of evidence or direct verification for any of it — including from those making the claims.

Leo in particular asserts that this entire life is imagination, that reality is fundamentally imagined by consciousness. But this raises unresolved issues. If imagination is the foundational substance of reality, then imagination itself should be examinable, articulable, and experientially navigable in a precise way — its structure, limits, dimensions, qualities, and degrees of freedom.

Yet there is surprisingly little direct exploration of imagination as such. No clear phenomenology of it. No detailed mapping of how imagination differs across states, depths, or levels of realization. No rigorous account of how one stabilizes or sustains this so-called “God-mode” awakening without chemical intervention.

If imagination is truly infinite and sovereign, why does accessing it seem so unreliable, transient, or dependent on extreme states? Why does realization collapse back into ordinary limitation so easily? Why does the claim remain massive, while embodiment remains elusive?

This leaves an uncomfortable fork: either the claim is overstated, poorly articulated, or incomplete — or the method of self-actualization being proposed is insufficient to realize what is being asserted. In either case, “it’s all imagination” remains more metaphysical assertion than lived, verifiable capacity.

Surprisingly Leo has not made a video I don't think about imagination as of yet, to actually explain his claim around this phenomenology. 

Edited 22 hours ago by Yeah Yeah