Absolute Infinity “Institute:” The Absolute Institute

[UnbornTao]

48 minutes ago, Breakingthewall said:

Be respectful with a new user that tries to transmit his vision. You aren't in the kindergarten 

It was directed to you. Sorry, @randydible. 

@Breakingthewall Train your listening abilities.

Edited Saturday at 08:40 PM by UnbornTao

[Breakingthewall]

5 minutes ago, UnbornTao said:

It was directed to you. Sorry, @randydible. 

@Breakingthewall Train your listening abilities.

It's ok if you don't understand what I'm saying, but don't get aggressive, just ask. 

Anyway, how could I know that was for me? It's the thread of the op, so seems that is for him. Next time you should quote the person that you want to answer, then he will know. 

Ah, I see that now you changed the post . At first was just "blah blah". I think you are not mature enough for this kind of topics 

Edited Saturday at 08:46 PM by Breakingthewall

[Sempiternity]

5 minutes ago, Breakingthewall said:

I think you are not mature enough for this kind of topics 

Pot calling the kettle black. 

[James123]

1 hour ago, Breakingthewall said:

That is meaningless. 

for "you". İf Ramana Maharsi can not help you, no one can. 

Peace.

[Breakingthewall]

Just now, Sempiternity said:

Pot calling the kettle black. 

Why do you try to insult me? I'm writing with everything that I have in any moment, with the best quality that I can. It's annoying that around are kids but I assume. Anyway, if you have any disagree with what I say, why don't try to rebuttal instead of using derogatory phrases to belittle someone? That only belittles you.

[UnbornTao]

18 minutes ago, Breakingthewall said:

It's ok if you don't understand what I'm saying, but don't get aggressive, just ask. 

Anyway, how could I know that was for me? It's the thread of the op, so seems that is for him. Next time you should quote the person that you want to answer, then he will know. 

Pretend to be humble and gracious, yet act dogmatic and closed-minded. I don't hear a real attempt at listening on your part - you always know everything. You'd even try to dispute the Buddha before grasping what he's actually saying. The arrogance!

It's like a child who hasn't yet learned to walk, criticizing Messi's football ability.

First, learn to walk. Then, master the subject. At some point along the way, you might begin to see the folly of your earlier judgments - and perhaps even recognize that some masters truly deserve the title.

Edited Saturday at 09:01 PM by UnbornTao

[Breakingthewall]

5 minutes ago, James123 said:

for "you". İf Ramana Maharsi can not help you, no one can. 

Peace.

 

Ramana said the opposite than Ramakrishna. 

Don't get stuck in figures with authority just because many agree with them

Edited Saturday at 08:58 PM by Breakingthewall

[Breakingthewall]

2 minutes ago, UnbornTao said:

Pretend to be humble and gracious, but then act quite dogmatic and closed-minded. There's no attempt at actual listening on your part. You always know everything. You'd even try to dispute the Buddha before understanding what he's getting across - the arrogance!

You're like a child who hasn't yet learned to walk, criticizing Messi’s soccer ability. First, learn to walk. Then, master the subject matter. At some point during that process, you will you see your previous folly more clearly - and perhaps even recognize that some masters truly deserve that title.

Just try to point any mistake in what I said. If you don't like me just because my vibration, I will take it like a real compliment. 

Edited Saturday at 08:57 PM by Breakingthewall

[Sempiternity]

13 minutes ago, Breakingthewall said:

I think you are not mature enough for this kind of topics 

 

2 minutes ago, Breakingthewall said:

Why do you try to insult me? I'm writing with everything that I have in any moment, with the best quality that I can. It's annoying that around are kids but I assume. Anyway, if you have any disagree with what I say, why don't try to rebuttal instead of using derogatory phrases to belittle someone? That only belittles you.

Perfect example.

[James123]

Just now, Breakingthewall said:

Peace, love, etc. when you are angry. 

I am actually very calm. Therefore, İt is your assumption. Do you cry, if you don't you really need to. 

I always sob.

[Breakingthewall]

18 minutes ago, James123 said:

I am actually very calm. Therefore, İt is your assumption. Do you cry, if you don't you really need to. 

I always sob.

Ok, well, it's quite weird to put videos of teachers to have like more power. Better would be with your own words 

Edited Saturday at 09:17 PM by Breakingthewall

[UnbornTao]

16 minutes ago, Breakingthewall said:

Just try to point any mistake in what I said. If you don't like me just because my vibration, I will take it like a real compliment. 

The whole place you're coming from - look at it. Refer to the metaphor of the kid who hasn't learned to walk yet but criticizes skillful people. Can you see how the content itself is secondary to the issue here? You're stuck in concepts - very ungrounded ones at that - and you confuse blabbering with actual understanding.

That you can't see this boggles my mind. Do the work first, and you'll clearly see how this is the case.

Sorry, I've been derailing the thread. 

Edited Saturday at 09:14 PM by UnbornTao

[Sempiternity]

3 minutes ago, UnbornTao said:

The whole place you're coming from - look at it. Refer to the metaphor of the kid who hasn't learned to walk yet but criticizes skillful people. Can you see how the content itself is secondary to the issue here? You're stuck in concepts - very ungrounded ones at that - and you confuse blabbering with actual understanding.

Spot on. Someone had to say it. 

[Breakingthewall]

45 minutes ago, UnbornTao said:

The whole place you're coming from - look at it. Refer to the metaphor of the kid who hasn't learned to walk yet but criticizes skillful people. Can you see how the content itself is secondary to the issue here? You're stuck in concepts - very ungrounded ones at that - and you confuse blabbering with actual understanding.

That you can't see this boggles my mind. Do the work first, and you'll clearly see how this is the case.

Sorry, I've been derailing the thread. 

For example?

[Breakingthewall]

1 hour ago, Sempiternity said:

Spot on. Someone had to say it. 

Sure. But something concrete, or it's just your emotional vibe? I know that reading something complex could be tired, so it's easy to get carried away by emotional impressions without understanding anything. But that doesn't make progress

[Breakingthewall]

2 hours ago, UnbornTao said:

You'd even try to dispute the Buddha before grasping what he's actually saying. The arrogance!

What is conciousness according Buddha? How zen Buddhism changes the concept? What is conciousness according advaita Vedanta? What is conciousness according neo advaita? What is the relationship with the word conciousness with the term in Sanskrit sat chit Ananda, that in neo advaita is translated as conciousness?

Over all: were is the difference between advaita Vedanta and neo advaita?

Edited Saturday at 11:08 PM by Breakingthewall

[UnbornTao]

@Breakingthewall No examples. You figure it out.