Review Ending unnecessary Suffering by Peter Ralston

[Willy Phallicus]

The big bang that supposedly birthed this universe was a random event that happened out of nowhere and for no reason.  Then it coalesced into super complex life forms that can feel emotions and question things purely by random and even the science mans math says none of this should rightly exist - the odds are astronomical and thus paradoxical in nature.

Then you resolve the paradox by finding out it doesn't really exist and the mystics and scientists are speaking the same language.  Its a dream - a complete fabrication - a very convincing illusion.  Dreams have beginnings and endings but the dreamer does not. 

49 minutes ago, Breakingthewall said:

How do you know that?

Direct experience.

Here's what else I know.  No one can answer the big questions for you.  Get it? QUESTions.  Its your quest and yours alone.  No one else can experience you on your behalf.  If any guru could answer the big questions and wake the walking dead then this whole shebang woulda started wrapping about 2800 years ago.  Just look at or for what theyre pointing too and eventually you'll get it.

Edited 17 hours ago by Willy Phallicus

[AION]

9 hours ago, Breakingthewall said:

Nothing doesn't exist except as an idea. There is not nothing, then there is not paradox

Pfff hahaahaha just stop

[Breakingthewall]

1 hour ago, AION said:

Pfff hahaahaha just stop

What means that? The exposure of your level? . Boring. So boring. 

Edited 7 hours ago by Breakingthewall

[AION]

23 minutes ago, Breakingthewall said:

What means that? The exposure of your level? . Boring. So boring. 

You are getting everything ass backwards because you are not reading the books and not doing the work.  So it is very tiresome to continually correct you because you are misunderstanding the points being made by the author. If you paid me 450 usd per hour I would gladly do it. 

Edited 7 hours ago by AION

[Breakingthewall]

1 hour ago, AION said:

You are getting everything ass backwards because you are not reading the books and not doing the work.  So it is very tiresome to continually correct you because you are misunderstanding the points being made by the author. If you paid me 450 usd per hour I would gladly do it. 

Yeah im not in your religion, that's why it's not nice for you sharing point of views with someone who doesn't know your dogmas. I understand, I'm sorry if I offended your beliefs. 

Thanks for the offering, im not interested for now in your religion, still preferring direct view 

Edited 5 hours ago by Breakingthewall

[Inliytened1]

11 hours ago, Breakingthewall said:

For example this: If the void is not contained or bounded, it is impossible for it to remain in a stable, flat state eternally, because then it would be limited to a flat state without fluctuation. Fluctuation occurs because it is a possibility; it is a breaking of symmetry that unfolds in a coherent equation that ultimately results in zero, a cycle that begins at zero and ends at zero and starts again and unfolds In infinite possibilities. 

I don't remember where we were but here you assume a void to begin with. You place it there and begin your explanation from there.  But no explanation of the void. 

[Inliytened1]

11 hours ago, Willy Phallicus said:

The big bang that supposedly birthed this universe was a random event that happened out of nowhere and for no reason.  Then it coalesced into super complex life forms that can feel emotions and question things purely by random and even the science mans math says none of this should rightly exist - the odds are astronomical and thus paradoxical in nature.

Then you resolve the paradox by finding out it doesn't really exist and the mystics and scientists are speaking the same language.  Its a dream - a complete fabrication - a very convincing illusion.  Dreams have beginnings and endings but the dreamer does not. 

Direct experience.

Here's what else I know.  No one can answer the big questions for you.  Get it? QUESTions.  Its your quest and yours alone.  No one else can experience you on your behalf.  If any guru could answer the big questions and wake the walking dead then this whole shebang woulda started wrapping about 2800 years ago.  Just look at or for what theyre pointing too and eventually you'll get it.

Yeah and where do dreams come from. Nowhere. 

[Breakingthewall]

37 minutes ago, Inliytened1 said:

I don't remember where we were but here you assume a void to begin with. You place it there and begin your explanation from there.  But no explanation of the void. 

 the void is not origin because there is not void and after fluctuation, because there is not before and after. Time appears when change appears, then change is always and no change is never. This is logic, science can explain how time is not essential but relative to a system, same than space. There are logical deductions very twisted but still logical 

[Breakingthewall]

38 minutes ago, Inliytened1 said:

Yeah and where do dreams come from. Nowhere. 

Reality doesn't "come from", that's a paradox, then impossible. If reality come from it's something previous than reality, then reality would be secondary so not reality. That's why that explanation about dream is not logical, then not possible 

[Inliytened1]

1 hour ago, Breakingthewall said:

 the void is not origin because there is not void and after fluctuation, because there is not before and after. Time appears when change appears, then change is always and no change is never. This is logic, science can explain how time is not essential but relative to a system, same than space. There are logical deductions very twisted but still logical 

Well if you say there is no origin then you are agreeing reality is paradoxical by nature - which based on today's science - is not scientifical. It is magical.  When science and magic merge we will have an all kind of new science.  And that will be something special. 

Edited 3 hours ago by Inliytened1

[Breakingthewall]

45 minutes ago, Inliytened1 said:

Well if you say there is no origin then you are agreeing reality is paradoxical by nature - which based on today's science - is not scientifical. It is magical.  When science and magic merge we will have an all kind of new science.  And that will be something special. 

Why according to science reality should have an origin? Science uses the concept of infinite. For example many theories contemplate the possibility of infinite multiverses, another infinite rebounds, like the Penrose's theory, who got the Nobel prize some years ago.

[Inliytened1]

2 minutes ago, Breakingthewall said:

Why according to science reality should have an origin? Science uses the concept of infinite. For example many theories contemplate the possibility of infinite multiverses, another infinite rebounds, like the Penrose's theory, who got the Nobel prize some years ago.

Science uses it loosely. Notice this.  Because if it were truly infinite that would break science. Today's science.