Enlightenment Debunked - A deep epistemological analysis of the non dual perspective

[Anton Rogachevski]

1 minute ago, Breakingthewall said:

not something mystic and very sacred

If you don't see that everything is absolutely mystical you are still under the illusion of "knowing". Nothing can be known.

[Yimpa]

3 minutes ago, Anton Rogachevski said:

Nothing can be known.

Everything can be a Divine Mystery.

Slide in them DMs, chaaa 

[Breakingthewall]

36 minutes ago, Anton Rogachevski said:

It appears timeless. There can't be anything infinite in actual reality, because an infinite object or anything infinite is impossible under the currently known natural laws as far as we know.

What is infinite is existence, being, not the object. Being isn't happening in the object, the object is happening in being. If anything is, everything is, because not being don't is, the limits of existence are non existence, then those limits doesn't exist, the existence is limitless, you can perceive it directly without doubt. The experience is happening in the existence, not otherwise, but the experience is totally absorbent then everyone is absorbed by the experience and are identified with it, but meditation, psychedelic, etc, all the enlightenment work aim to open yourself to another dimension, the dimensión of the pure being beyond the experience 

[Princess Arabia]

1 hour ago, Anton Rogachevski said:

If you don't see that everything is absolutely mystical you are still under the illusion of "knowing". Nothing can be known.

Love that comment. Nice blog, btw.

[Breakingthewall]

2 hours ago, Anton Rogachevski said:

you don't see that everything is absolutely mystical you are still under the illusion of "knowing". Nothing can be known

Mystical means nothing. If everything is mystical everything is normal. You can't know, you can understand. 

[Breakingthewall]

 

In other words, if there is no awareness of something, what is there? Nothing. What is nothing? Absolute potential. Therefore, awareness of something reappears. If it reappears, when did it not exist? Never. Where is never? In nowhere. Always is being because not being is never, then being is infinite. It could take infinite dimensions, because nothing is infinite potential. It's simple inevitable logic, because existence is logical, just because logical is an arising in existence  

The question would be: why nothing is infinite potential? Because nothing is limitless, that's the main point. This is the root of the understanding, when you realize the absolute nothingness, and you realize that in it everything is, because the absence of limitations of the nothingness has as its inevitable consequence the explosion of the infinite totality. You can see it directly, without logical mind involved, it's within you 

Edited March 30 by Breakingthewall

[Anton Rogachevski]

8 hours ago, Princess Arabia said:

Love that comment. Nice blog, btw.

Thank you 

It's very old, I haven't written anything there for a while