Carl-Richard

Moderator
 View profile  See their activity

  • Content count

    16,218

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Carl-Richard

  2. Posted

    15 minutes ago, PurpleTree said:

    Show me the people that got enlightened from this “transmission”

    If you're not open to transmission yourself, it's unlikely that you will be convinced just by showing examples. But this video came to mind. But if you are genuinely curious, look into it yourself. You have ChatGPT for god's sake.

     

     

  3. Posted

    26 minutes ago, Breakingthewall said:

    That's very dangerous territory. First, you define enlightenment as the end of suffering and immortality, something anyone would want, the most any human being can aspire to. And then you say you can give that in exchange for money.

    Lol. You also have to spend time on Enlightenment, which is money.

    The enlightened master has to have money so they can spend time on enlightening you. Do you want them to spend the most amount of time enlightening people or spend their time doing something else and less time enlightening people?

  4. Posted · Edited by Carl-Richard

    12 minutes ago, Breakingthewall said:

    Agree, I think he thought he has powers and he can enlighten people by skype. Crazy right?

    I know the concept of transmission just breaks some people's minds and they can't get their head around it and they don't seem to experience it. But you can enlighten somebody through a picture. If your only interface with reality is your neurotic mind and you face a brick wall when it comes to anything energetic, of course you will distrust people who claim to do anything energetic. But then simply invoke the fact that you are ignorant instead of pretending like you're uncovering a conspiracy every time you talk about a semi-renowned spiritual person.

  6. Posted · Edited by Carl-Richard

    52 minutes ago, Breakingthewall said:

    Not everywhere, just where it is. Everyone has some narcissism, it's important to understand it. 

    Yah you are right, nothing wrong, and just 10.000 us in 1 year

    Btw nahm used to say that he is millionaire due his 3 business 

    Anyway, let's forget the conversation, you are right, he's the most legit person. I understand your point, you judge according your emotions. It's ok. 

    Even if I refrain from levying your own level of paranoia against you and assume you are being 100% accurate in your portrayal of the facts, taking money for services is not a proof against one being enlightened. You're engaging in conspiratorial thinking. "He is taking seemingly large amounts of money for a service => surely this must mean he is only in it for the money and his services have zero value and he has none of his alleged qualities". There is no necessary direct causal connection between these two things. There is a high degree of uncertainty between them, and you are playing on a high degree of suspicion and mistrust for your causal connection to become the most likely option.

     

    Quote

    paranoia

    /ˌparəˈnɔɪə/

    noun

    1.

    unjustified suspicion and mistrust of other people or their actions.

    "I got into a state of paranoia about various night noises which in daylight seems utterly silly"

    2.

    the unwarranted or delusional belief that one is being persecuted, harassed, or betrayed by others, occurring as part of a mental condition.

     

  7. Posted

    1 hour ago, Breakingthewall said:

    How could be legit someone who accept 10 k for transmission to enlightenment from a guy who's depressed and lost?  Anyway, bad for my side mentioning for that reason someone who is not here for answering 

    Raptorsin: "I want a transmission, here is a few dollars".

    Nahm: "Ok, glad to help".

    *Repeat many dozens of times over a large period of time*

    Breakingthewall: "That's a scam".

    You would think my gym is a scam if I showed you my last 10 years of expenses.

     

    1 hour ago, Breakingthewall said:

    I don't mean that they should be perfect, but at least not essentially liars 😅. 

    Most of them really believe that they are legit, enlightened, saint and everything, it's the mechanics of narcissism, it's very surprising mental structure. I will start a thread about narcissism, it's extremely interesting topic

    Projecting narcissism everywhere is an interesting topic.

  8. Posted · Edited by Carl-Richard

    16 minutes ago, Schizophonia said:

    Because you forced yourself, because you've seen articles or videos saying nuts are awesome for some reason.

    Last time, I was stuck on a cottage at night where the option was less nutrients or more walnuts, and I had forgotten what walnuts tend to do. I actually like the taste of walnuts in my mouth, but I can't eat too much for my stomach.

     

    16 minutes ago, Schizophonia said:

    You instinctively know what's good for you; you'll know what's completely incompatible and therefore disgusting, you'll know what's compatible and good but overly processed and therefore not interesting in large quantities, and you'll know what's totally good.

    If you do this, you'll naturally return to the foods you loved as a child. Not only is it satisfying, but even though many of these foods are processed, you'll still have better gut health, more energy, etc.

    For example:
    Breakfast: Two large slices of bread with butter or pork fat, with a little garlic rubbed on the bread.
    With that, a coffee with sugar and a little rum, or a glass of fresh orange juice.

    Lunch: Plate of buttered pasta with Parmesan cheese and 125g of ground beef or a few fresh sardines if you have less mony, a green salad with a little olive oil and balsamic vinegar, a small glass of red wine if you want.

    Snack: Fruit if it's summer, otherwise a piece of bread with dark chocolate.

    Dinner: A truly traditional dish like cassoulet.

    With all this, there's no intestinal problems or malnutrition, it's not that expensive, and it's very good.

    Whereas if you listen to nutrition gurus, you'll be doomed to dissatisfaction, stress, and various problems (because you don't follow your intuition).

    Like dating actually lol.

    I don't like how large glucose spikes or large spikes of anything (e.g. caffeine, alcohol) make me feel, so I avoid most of those foods.

  9. Posted · Edited by Carl-Richard

    11 hours ago, RendHeaven said:

     the difference is that overdosing on B-vitamins once (or even consistently) is not harmful at all, you'll just pee it out.

    whereas a multivitamin is something you take every single day, and can contain compounds that you can't simply pee away. Like iron. Excess iron could cause serious problems for some men. you should actually check whether a multivitamin is right for you or not.

    Yes, but when this is the range (e.g. only 100g brazil nuts is around 3500% the RDA of selenium), it's not unexpected that many people would be eating foods regularly that many-folds their RDA of some nutrients. The carnivore diet is one glaring example.

    Add to that the fact that people disagree on various RDAs with many-fold margins (e.g. vitamin D, and in fact B vitamins) and that the real RDA can be doubled between e.g. a 100 lb person and a 200 lb person while most people simply read off the same RDA on the label, things definitely start to look muddy.

    But yes, definitely test yourself.

  10. Posted · Edited by Carl-Richard

    11 hours ago, aurum said:

    You're already eating meat, so you're likely not at risk. This is for vegans.

    We're also not just talking about chicken vs lamb, we're talking 10-20% of your entire diet.

    1. You know I said something very specific, "if you are already aiming at 100g"? And then I said if you are just a lousy fad-seeking nutritionally unaware vegan, your point is more valid?

    2. We're definitely not talking just about chicken vs lamb. We're talking about chicken breast vs chicken thighs, drinking tea vs not drinking tea, eating high polyphenol foods vs not, the list goes on.

    Also, even if you eat meat, you can eat something like too much walnuts on the side (which I've done many times) and absolutely destroy your digestion of other things like minerals due to the phytic acid (and your stomach generally feels like absolute shit).

    If you want a diet with sub-single percentage nutritional precision, you have to research literally all the biochemicals and all the nutritional profiles of literally everything you eat.

  11. Posted · Edited by Carl-Richard

    7 hours ago, Breakingthewall said:

    What can I do If I smell the liars from miles? Do you remember nahm? You think he was legit .be careful! Some people are dangerous, no jokes. He stole 10 k dollars to an user, raptorsin, promising enlightenment by transmission, and you still thought that maybe he's legit. Spirituality is full of that people . Of better, that people converges in spirituality. I think it's good idea to point it. 

    Lmao. You always seem to make spirituality the teacher's sole responsibility, as if they are omniscient and can bend every millimeter of reality to their will, and as if you giving them your money is their sole responsibility. Raptorsin was a hard nut, he would probably need 100k in transmissions. Nahm was the most legit person on the forum.

  15. Posted · Edited by Carl-Richard

    1 hour ago, aurum said:

    I don't know about that.

    If it is as high as 20%, that's pretty significant. That's like one meal for most vegans.

    If you're a vegan, you should know about this. Vegan foods tend to be high in fiber and volume, which means you can easily under-eat. 

    Plus, you probably want higher than 100g. 100g is pretty low for most people.

    It can be significant, just like eating a slice of lamb can be significantly different from eating a slice of chicken (lamb tends to have about 20% less protein than chicken breast). But you won't die from that difference alone. The real problem is just if you eat too little. I personal tend to eat the same amount of different meats in overall weight and that's it; if sometimes there is more fat and less protein, I don't really feel much of a difference (unless of course you want to be a psychonaut about it).

    On a tangential note, this reminds me a bit of people who react to you taking a multivitamin with "be careful that you don't get too much", as if they care about that while downing a pound of oysters and getting 1000% the RDA of zinc, or they eat some extra steak one day at a barbeque and get 300% the RDA of certain B-vitamins, or they eat a few brazil nuts and get 3000% the RDA of selenium. Sometimes people get real hung up on certain numbers but are rather ignorant about what different foods do.

  16. Posted · Edited by Carl-Richard

    28 minutes ago, aurum said:

    Hard to say exactly. Most sources seem to suggest about 10-20%.

    https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0924224421006774?via%3Dihub

    https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6643/15/13/2870

    In that case, if you're consciously aiming for 100g, you probably won't notice much of a difference, unless you tend to accurately weigh your different meats to offset similar differences (different meats have e.g. different protein to fat ratios and around the same percentage differences). It's ironically more crucial knowledge for those that already don't track what they're eating and are more likely to eat too little protein (and which fall for fads and "genius" ideas like "one banana for breakfast").

  20. Posted · Edited by Carl-Richard

    53 minutes ago, Schizophonia said:

    God google says it exists but you must have a stroke, an accident, suffer a cardiac arrest or something like that.

    Yeah. I said "essentially vascular dementia". Sub-clinical vascular dementia. Sometimes reduction of blood flow can become so severe that it leads to acute cell death. But in general, reduction of blood flow leads to reduced cell functioning (and a shorter cell life expectancy, so your cells die faster).

  24. Posted · Edited by Carl-Richard

    4 hours ago, chess_king said:

    Not true lol, I have never entered a gym in my life except for one day, and I am skinny af and I eat anything and everything. I put like 5 sugar spoons in one cup of tea, min 3 cups a day. I never had diabetes, and I eat junk food and cola; I never got fat or got diabetes. I am not even like a normal person. I am skinny af.

    We're obviously talking about sub-clinical "diabetes" in quotation marks here. If you didn't have dementia, you would understand this 😂 (jking).

    And if you simply eat less (which skinny people tend to do), glucose obviously becomes less of a problem. Nevertheless, spiking your blood sugar with cola and fast food will cause inflammation, even if you're able to clear it from your blood eventually and you don't have chronic elevation and severe dysfunction of insulin as in real diabetes.

  25. Posted · Edited by Carl-Richard

    If you have low cardiovascular function, you essentially have vascular dementia, because blood can't get to your brain. So no cardio means dementia.

    If you have low muscle mass, you essentially have diabetes, because glucose can't get out of your bloodstream (skeletal muscle is responsible for about 80 to 90% of insulin-meditated glucose clearance). And high blood glucose leads to inflammation. So no lifting weights means diabetes, which leads to chronic inflammation, which is also associated with dementia.

    So the answer is "stay hard" :ph34r: