SOUL

Don't be silly, this is the anti-universe, that other one is the real one where humans aren't screwing it up.

Sounds like identity politics to me.... what's their pronouns?

...and it's so important to figure and understand if your beeeyyyyyytaahhhhh! HAHA

Yea... trying to figure out whether they are alpha makes them what stage in spiral dynamics? BWAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAAAAAA

@Preety_India Always remember how much I appreciate and care about you...if you are going to remember something.

You got caught in the trap of your imagination. I didn't say the words 'good and bad', why did you bring them up? Because it seems you are contending with your imagination and not having a discussion with me. Consider this when talking with others so you can understand them for what they are saying and won't find yourself talking past them or injecting in things not being said. I thought there was no separation between infinite and finite? At least that is what you communicated to me in another thread. Why the different 'rules' for infinite and finite? If 'god' loves creation does 'god' also fear and hate it? If there is no value in the infinite why would 'god' value creation and have love for it but not the others? You didn't respond to the other questions, any particular reason? "Let me also ask if you believe everybody chose their life, maybe even before they were born, and everything that happens to them? Do you believe the 'law of attraction'? That people can and do bring everything that happens to them into their life?"

Neutral huh? Every event in life is neutral and only 'preferences' is why someone would think it's other than neutral? Let me also ask if you believe everybody chose their life, maybe even before they were born, and everything that happens to them? Do you believe the 'law of attraction'? That people can and do bring everything that happens to them into their life? I'm not talking just about the perception based on belief, preference or opinion about what happens, you think everything is actually 'neutral', has no positive or negative effect however one might characterize it, it's completely neutral?

@Razard86 This line seemed incomplete when I wrote it but I was typing stream of consciousness right through it all and forgot to go back to edit it as I was distracted by other things. Such is the nature of the finite mind...haha. I really do sense it's a insightful distinction that shouldn't be overlooked so will make an extra post pointing it out. I would edit it to 'Finite is limited, infinite is unlimited, this is a description of quantitative and qualitative characteristics.'

To be honest I'm not very well read on these things, I have read pretty much nothing about it and my exposure comes through others sharing it. I'm more of an autodidact that had certain amount of awakening before I even heard others talk about spirituality. So I did a quick search and found 10 quotes from him and I can say it resonates with what of what we hear in the new age thought. It could even be said he laid the some of the foundational concepts for what the new age became. While I really like what those quotes said and can agree with much of it I am cautious about some of the 'law of' ideas because while it is true we create our perspective in the imagination there are some things in life it is difficult to attribute to it. I'm not going to go into detail here as it's not my place to be critical of what works for others in how their inner work is. If those ideas bring well being and cessation of self suffering who am I to say anything to hinder that? So be it.

@Razard86 I didn't create a duality between wave and function, physics did, I was merely pointing to the difference that physics creates and that's the label in scientific understanding it was given. Of course it's not a duality in reality because there is also the observer, which is another element of the process and the environment which is another element as well. So that makes four elements required for the nature of 'wave-particle' physics. Yes, the wave is an unbroken aspect that is undefined and the particle is defined, it has a beginning and an end. This is a description of how the universe manifests itself into actually being a physical existence. Of course, this doesn't account for the observer, which is a finite example of awareness and the environment which is a finite example of the void. Those four elements are finite, they are not infinite in that they aren't unlimited. Finite is limited, infinite in unlimited, this is a description of quantity, there is no line between them but they can be described as what they are. Actually we can observe the infinite with a variation of that experiment. In a delayed observer variation the recording is delayed and it appeared as if the particle was retroactively created to account for the delayed observer. So they were able to show how quantum doesn't respect time in physics. They showed how time is merely a construct of physics and that what we would call 'now' transcends the 'time' of physics. They also can demonstrate how the 'space' of physics can also be transcended with the entanglement experiments. Showing how what we call 'now' and 'void' are outside of physics, they are even outside of what we would call 'infinite' in the physics sense because they are timeless and spaceless. 'Awareness' and 'being' we say are infinite in physics since they are unlimited but in reality they are like 'now' and 'void' as they are outside of what we would call infinite because they transcend infinite even if we call them that. These are elements that are the basis of the quantum which produces classical physics and exist as the root of what we understand as wave. In a physics sense they existed 'before' the big bang and are what could be called absolute elements. I'm not drawing lines between these things as if they separate, this is a description of them and I can continue to describe it all the way until it's unified as one that some would call 'god'. The more manifest in the physical it is the more appearance of separation exists the closer to unity it is the less the appearance of separation exists. Though, yes, this is only an appearance of separation because, yes, it's all one. Language isn't effective in describing the abstract and formless but I'm glad we can try to clarify even if it's not always adequate.

The mystical mind seems to misinterpret what this experiment shows us. The double slit experiment reveals to us that a photon behaves like a wave when unobserved and behaves like a particle when observed. These are two different finite states that the photon behaves with, an infinite state wouldn't behave in finite ways. This has brought on many mistaken understandings about the nature of the universe that plays out in many of the 'quantum consciousness' ideas of the modern mystics. 'Observation' in the context of the environment of physics also has finite behavior. So, we cannot glean much useful infinite understanding from examining the finite. Although, we can use awareness to transcend finite behavior, awareness is consciousness that isn't bound by the observer and observed finite behavior model so isn't bound by the wave-particle duality. Contemplate that and you may find new awakenings will blossom that aren't bound by the finite 'quantum consciousness' understanding Desire works in the finite world, it manifests in the urges and impulses that behaves in productive ways for the body to survive. It has has uses in the wave-particle duality for the physical manifest we live in. Although, in awareness desire's duality is a hindrance because it is finite so behaves with finite effect. We have to do things in the physical world to 'create' the things we want for us so desire has a function. Yet, in consciousness this duality 'creates' self suffering so to not allow desire to 'create' the separation by transcending it brings us liberation. It doesn't do the work to 'create' things, we still chop wood and carry water, it ceases the self suffering in consciousness. Seeking ultimate understanding of all is something the mind attempts to 'create' through desire. Awareness can transcend this desire to understand and then all is revealed because it was never anything we are separated from anyway. Awareness is infinite, understanding is finite so the mind would have us seek to understand because it is finite.

I'm not sure I know what you mean when you use those two terms, conscious creation and quantum physics, so I ask you to explain a little bit more if you would be kind enough to.

Is this a misquote? Who are you talking to?

I didn't demonize desire, that's in your imagination. The implication of desire is a want for something one doesn't have, that is an imaginary separation that the mind has created between your awareness and the 'understanding' your mind has veiled from it. When one has something there is need to desire it, this isn't a moral judgment, this is an explanation of what desire is. Curiosity can also suggest an exploration of something one already has so isn't synonymous with desire. You are complete, all understanding is part of your awareness if you are awakened to being 'god realized' as you have been running all around this forum claiming to be. As soon as you cease to let your mind hide it from your awareness this will be clear to you. It becomes obvious the longer people talk when they have the jargon, rhetoric and descriptions but not the actual awakening.

@Someone here You said 'I want' in the title and the desire for something is the mind setting up a obstacle between what it perceives it doesn't have. Remove the desire for it and awareness will be able to observe it without being obstructed by the mind. It's a self created veil, the mind does this to keep us seeking, to keep us on the hamster wheel chasing nothing.

@Preety_India I thought to add but waited until you replied that why it is helpful to not resist the content of the mind is this adds conflict to the mind as part of the new pattern creation. The reason to just simply behave as we seek for ourselves is because this creates a pattern for the subconscious mind to learn from, to use as experience to draw on. We are modeling behavior for the mind to become more like in the future because we don't wish it to always be such a source of distress. If we contend with it by resisting it's content this is the model we are giving to the mind to remember as the experience. It's healing to create a fresh pattern grounded in well being not one that has remaining contention. I hope this clarified my message a bit more. Peace.

Desire for the ultimate understanding of all reality is a stumbling block to it.

Can you rephrase this part and explain it to me again because I didn't understand it. Any time our mind creates some feelings, thoughts or impulses in us to behave a certain way in response to a perceived reason to protect our 'self' we can use it as another opportunity to transcend that attachment to what the mind creates. We can create the healing dynamic we seek for us in the present moment instead of fall into the reactive dynamic the mind desires for us. Be what we seek for us even if the mind is dancing around trying to get us to act in reaction to it but if we resist it we are actually giving it credibility as something to that needs to be resisted. We are taking our energy which can be used for creating what we seek in us and using it on contending with something that doesn't really exist, it's the mind imagining something that it wants us to react to. Transcend it and be in the the present what we seek to be. I used many more words and some of the same words to rephrase it I hope that's ok. Peace and hugs, you are one of my favorite members.

@Kksd74628 You can apologize for something and ask forgiveness but if you expect another to accept your apology and extend you forgiveness this will only create or perpetuate distress within yourself. Nobody is owed anything just because they have done something they themselves may not have been asked to do so if you see that it was fit to extend an apology, just apologize and leave it at that. Adding more contention to the situation is actually sullying the appearance of how genuine the apology is as it seems like you are doing it for yourself, not the one you feel you have wronged. @Preety_India You made yourself vulnerable by sharing with us about something you are struggling to resolve within you. This shows how much you trust this forum and I hope that trust has not been broken or neutered in any way. Quite often anger is a result of some perceived mistreatment from others and rightly or wrongly it is something our self identity will react to. Use this is another opportunity or any time it does to not agree with the triggered feelings, thoughts or impulses meant to motivate reactive behavior. Don't just resist it, instead transcend it and behave as you seek for yourself, be the change you want to see in yourself. I wish healing and well being for you.

I inherited some anger issues and the environment of my youth added to that but what helped me the most was not 'endorsing' the feeling, that would amplify it. It also helped me to have healthy and creative outlet for that energy, too. For me drumming is one of those things, I also busted up alot of firewood and carved stone. Things that simulate aggressive or destructive behavior but isn't really that at all. Dance could be in that mold, athletics as well, whatever it is that will expend that energy in a healthy way. Then when any anger in the monkey mind is triggered I found it easier to not empower it or be sucked in to the cycle. It's not an easy process to dampen this energy though and the monkey mind will not let go of this habituation quickly but will return to it quickly,

Since everyone is deluded about something we might as well enjoy the trip.

Yea, pets domesticated humans so they could have a better survival...

How dare they not try to recruit me! I guess this is where I'll get all the culty false teachings...haha

Why do you pretend on the internet to be something you are not? Oh wait... I know the answer...

First, get this out of the way because you bolded the word 'all' as if you think it proves I said all republicans... english might not be your first language so may not understand the sentence structuring that well. Let me clarify, the all is in front of the word 'for' so that means the all is saying how 'for' are they? They are 'all for' it. If I was trying to apply it to republicans I'd put it in front of that word and said 'all republicans' are for it. Where did I get that big government theocracy from? Them. Look at their social media timelines, their web pages, their ads, their speeches. They are for 'god fearing' politicians that are guided by the religious principles of their religious book. They want to jam their god into schools, government and every facet of society even passing laws that compel others to adhere to their beliefs like zero tolerance bans on reproductive rights and blocking LGBT rights. They want to use government to enforce their beliefs on others, that's big government theocracy. Do you dispute this? We'd be hard pressed to find even one republican that isn't like this, it's virtually impossible to get through the republican primaries successfully without a 'god' platform and adhering to the religiously inspired policies. They support authoritarian dictators all over the world like in Saudi Arabia, Philippines and others. They also love nothing more than to instigate coups in South American countries that have democratically elected left wing leaders and instill right wing dictators who are in favor of letting corporations loot the country of natural resources for the benefit of very few while violently oppressing any dissension. Many of them now have affection for Putin because Trump does and some have even gone as far as Russian apologia about Ukraine, not many, but some. He increased drone bombing by almost ten fold over previous presidents and once it was reported in the press he hid the numbers for the rest of his presidency. The genocides in Yemen and Palestine intensified because he gave full endorsement and weapons sales to SA and Israel to do it. He publicly praised Putin for the 'smart move' of going into Ukraine, you think he would do anything to stop him let alone apply the severity of sanctions the current President has? Trying to place any blame on any President for what Putin does is foolish, this was something that was going to happen at some point. Putin wanted it and had been signaling for a long time starting with Georgia and Crimea. It's the same playbook being used. Since those countries were once part of the USSR there is Russian speaking people there so Putin stirs up rebellious attitudes and arms them. They claim to be 'independent', Russia goes in to defend the couple of districts from the governments in those countries and then takes the whole country installing their puppet leaders in place. This isn't happening 'under Biden'... it's happening 'under Putin', Biden isn't at the head of European countries, EU or NATO, so it isn't 'under' him. That's just your misguided attempt to blame him for something he has no control over. If Trump was in Putin would still be doing it. Trump wanted to nuke a hurricane, he really wanted to drop them on Iran he begged to be able to do it but people who have more common sense pried the football away from him. So he dropped the largest conventional bomb he could... the MOAB, the 'mother of all bombs'. He was repeatedly overheard saying about nukes 'why do we have them if we aren't going to se them? So, yes, he'd be 'trying' to use them like he tried to before if he was still President...somewhere! I said he'd be trying not he'd be dropping. Of course, twisting what was said into what one wants to hear and argue against is a common mistake people make on the internet if others don't point out it's happening. I just did. He also ordered a drone strike on and killed foreign diplomats on the way to peace talks, an actual war crime. I'm not defending Biden or democrats, I could spell out they are nearly as bad as Trump and republicans... nearly, not quite but pretty close. Not much discussion from you though, just incredulous doubt, maybe try responding now. Let's see.