Nahm

Member
  • Content count

    26,563
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Nahm

  1. @Hellspeed Imagining the world where every one sings. ?
  2. Are all books really of the same exact value? Are those books about discovering yourself, going within, etc, really just the same as books like how to use computers n fix cars n stuff? Also, what do you think about beer and or psychedelics on the “path” (if there is such a thing)? Some times I just feel like there could be like more than what we are seeing, if that makes any sense. Never mind, it’s silly really.
  3. @Joshe Great timing to read The Celestine Prophecy, if you haven’t yet. It tends to really blow that synchronicity up into the ‘next level’.
  4. Ya for sure! Since consciousness is all the same, it’s all the absolute. Even before that happened, you experienced the absolute.
  5. Potentiality, preference, thought, things. Look around the room, every thing was a thought. Wether we make these distinctions of consciousness, is also preference, thought.
  6. In the ballpark though. There’s no love, murder, someone, family, next level, ego, transcendence, I, or there. Otherwise, really close! ??
  7. The illusion is that there is a you which is a separate thing, perceiving objects. In actuality, there is just consciousness. The suffering of this “illusion” is that this “separate you” is existing / living / alive, and will cease to exist. Consciousness is indeed so real, it is taken at face value to be material. All there is, is consciousness, and consciousness is ‘real’ (but real is real only if we think there is unreal). There is one “thing” and it is consciousness. There are not two things, wether that’s a perceiver and an object perceived, or any other two things, such as a “you” and a earth or universe or reality. So there is also no illusion. Is there perception in a dream? There would have to be yet another you, and objects, in that dream. What is real, is ‘dream fabric’, or any other nonsense word, until it is all you, vs this idea of a ‘you’ which was ever separate. If you apply a word such as real, or consciousness, it’s wrong. And applying the word wrong, is not right. And saying it’s not right, is incorrect. And applying a word such as incorrect, isn’t accurate. etc. Etc. See that you are it, so a word applied is divided in thought, and can not be it. And now the word it must go. And now the notion that something must go, must go. Etc. It's just You, but now who said you, there is no thing which is not you to make the reference, there’s no reference because there are not two. Etc. Mindf’n loopy loop. But there’s no loop either, and unequivocally no mind, but me as the sayer of these things also must go. And so, silence. There’s never been a thing to figure out, because there’s never been a thing. Think less, love more. Paradoxically, the more it’s all a dream, the more awoke. But there are no paradoxes.
  8. @GabeN Before looking into things, I assumed I started existing when I was born. The cosmic joke says, not so much. It’s a ridulous notion really.
  9. Ha! The cosmic joke - you thought you were a person, in the universe! You thought you didn’t exist, and then you did! You thought you were separate! Thought is very funny. ?
  10. @kieranperez Awesome pic. Funny how often the infinite void is questioned, yet everyone of us can just look up at night and see for ourselves.
  11. Well, you can look into the maya or perception, you can take that ride, and eventually the abyss will look back, but it is much easier and more direct to go to the I which is believed to exist & perceive. And that will ultimately need to be done anyways. Unless you’re homeless, broke down, and would rather just simply die. I hear that works too. (Tolle, Katie, etc)
  12. @BreezeWW Hi welcome, I love you. Nothing.❤️ The “place/state” similar to that moment before falling a sleep, where the self is seen through, and you’re like, “oh, well shit, ya, that’s easier than I made it”, or “wait! Wow! That answer was so simple all along!”, which expands, and becomes you, or more accurately, it already was, just now again, is.
  13. The brilliance of not pursing brilliance with “cosmology” is brilliant. ❤️ Ralston.