Nahm

Love.

Meditation is a difference of meditation & being. Being is no difference of meditation.

@Shin I hear ya. “Cultural love” is desire imo. I’m talkin bout Love. Non-some-people Love.

Love.

@Schahin I think he should make an account and ask whatever questions he has. You can’t do that for him. His doing of it, and his asking is the beginning of the healing. You should talk with your dad about rethinking finding a doctor & a therapist for your brother. He’ll get help when he’s ready, in any additional ways.

@Schahin Sorry if I missed it, but has he been screened for typical things by a doctor or hospital, tried different therapies, reiki, etc? Also, if he is interested in healing, why hasn’t he made an account here?

@Schahin Brevity is always appreciated. So he tried a fruit diet, and a shaman lady? That’s it? Also, how did he learn about black magic?

@Schahin What has he tried so far?

I left a note which I recently found. It said, “there’s no reincarnation”. Not sure what to make of it.

@Schahin Does he want to be healed?

@ColdFacts You are overthinking but using thought to assess if that is true. Every foundation of your thinking is false. Psychedelics are great for this.

Freudian slippage? ???

@cetus56 ?♥️

@electroBeam If thoughts were made from clay, and as soon as the clay becomes a thought the clay is missed, what would be the thing to do, to understand the answers to the questions which arise in the thoughts?

Won’t be found in thought. Meditation is the way. It’s far more subjective that you’ve yet experienced.

@Schahin What specifically would you do with regards to you brother?

@Schahin You’re using thought in an attempt to define thought. Careful with that slippery slope. Lifetimes go by in relativity.

@Kushu2000 Welcome to the forum. Truth can’t be thought. Love ya.

If you get overwhelmed meditating, sit and write about the sensations & emotions. Don’t go into thought / content.

@EvilAngel Apocalypse imminent! ♥️

@Preetom That about sums it up. Punchline; no one is here.

@Preetom Callback to self image.

Might sound crazy & harsh, but you are that masochist, because that is actually something you could do. Lots of dudes do. 100,000 in the practical sense obviously is overkill, but you could actualize that dream. It’d be great for a bit, and you’d more deeply realize suffering, and Will. It’s a can’t lose situation. No sense in blaming “God” btw. That would just be you, on a you, with a you infinity of you.

In motion descriptively / conceptually but not actually. A “tree that falls in the woods without no one there to hear it” isn’t actual, it’s a reference to an abstraction of separation. The foundation of the scenario is inherently false. If a tree in your dream falls in the woods but you weren’t there to hear it, then there wasn’t the dream. If there was a dream with a tree, you were “there”, as the knower of this dream. When you wake up, there was not a tree, nor woods, nor person who saw & heard it - what there actually was - was your dream. There isn’t actually motion or content. Only in creating, forgetting, and believing, is the content (maya) created. Look at the farthest point you can see, then all the way back to the body. All of that is you, no content, just you, entirely. The “creating, forgetting, believing, remembering, is actually contentless. Pure illusion. No resources used, no things, no content. Just you. And not even me. Literally just the you you know as you. There was motion & content in your dream last night, but when you wake up, there wasn’t actually - what it actually was, was your dream. There isn’t an ‘all’ of infinity. All is conceptual, a ‘limit from within’ style of concept. There isn’t an “it”, as it would be other than that which says “it”. There isn’t an ever, nor a not ever, because there isn’t time. “Ever” very subtly inserts a “now”. It might be sounding overly critical, but it’s hopefully helpful in noticing what is mental conceptual overlay, and more of what is actual. A thought.......if there is a perspective, what / who is aware of the perspective? And if you acknowledge you are the awareness of the perspective, then notice it is actually a thought(s) which you are aware of, like the rest of the thoughts, which are the same as the rest of awareness. The perspective is made of thoughts, the thoughts (as finite limited bits of intelligence) are made of you (infinite, unlimited intelligence - appearing limited), and you are awareness. Good chance I’m “talking over each other”, sorry if so.

@Inliytened1 Indeed. ♥️?? @Bufo Alvarius One approach is to consider what you know, but can not identify / spot / pinpoint - that is your ‘identity’ (using that word loosely). What is, is all that is. Because what is is all that is, it can not be defined, no distinctions can be made regarding what is everything. There’s no not-part-of-everything-thing which could define everything. Love, Intelligence, Peace, etc - you know these, and you can not locate these. “These” are known to you, these are you. You know these but can not “find” them, because there is no second “place” which they could be “found in”. Nonetheless, you Know the Self indeed. You are the “fabric” of everything. So there is not an “everything”, nor a “thing”, but rather, just you. God does not experience anything but Self, God, and therefore there is no experience, rather, Being. “Time frames” is still mental, abstraction, a subtle indication of separate “frames”. There is no “again and again”. God does not need anything, no filter, no “finite mind”, to experience God. God can never experience God. You already are. What ever that would be, it is actually already God. Consider....Self not knowing Self, and the universe as a means for Self to know Self Infinity....compared to Self not ever being able to define Self because it already is Self, and Knows this, and there is no “other” to define Self, so what does Infinite All Knowing Self do? Creates, forgets, “experiences”. Actually? No.