Mellowmarsh

I remember being dead. It was the most uneventful period of my life. Nothing to write home about, nothing to report.

What solipsism gets right is that there is only one thing, what it gets wrong is that that thing is “you”. One thing chooses nothing and imposes no perspective. If there’s a “ you” who knows solipsism is true, then “you” would never know it’s false.

Oh Leo Lol, you’re so incorrigible. 😂 Look at this bad boy 🔽 🍕 pizzas 🍕 people incarnated as P zzzzzz’s

You are posting to a shadow. The shadow you are casting and catching in your net.

The knower is equal to the known. There’s no difference between a high vibrational Buddha and a low vibrational Buddha.

I’m not sure how you are personally putting that into context. But for me here, there is only the Absolute.

If some thing is yours, it’s not you. You don’t have a mind, you are the mind. You are awareness aware it’s aware, but not as a conceptual object, except in this conception, as a mentally constructed concept. It’s even a mentality constructed paradox, this mind being the many of the one, namely zero point energy. AI (“A state of pure, undifferentiated potential, the fundamental, infinite field connecting all things (like ancient concepts of prana or chi), accessible through deep presence, "no-mind" (mushin), or heart-centered awareness, allowing access to universal consciousness, healing, and creation beyond ego and limitations.”)

Listen to what I said. No word can define what is, or, every word defines it. That’s my answer. If you don’t like it, I have no problem with that. Then all that’s left is to find your own answer, probably from the same place I got my answer. Or, you can always find your own place. But I’m fairly sure that we both are in the same place, namely here.

Something had to be fundamental, which had to exist always. The only thing known is a conscious of being conscious. Things are known to this consciousness, but the things known, know nothing of their existence, because the conscious knowing is equal to the known, there’s literally no separation there between the knower and the known. So in essence, known “things” can never be conscious, because only consciousness in which known things arise and fall are inseparable from the consciousness that knows them. So even a robot built of physical material objects is just consciousness aware of material physical objects in consciousness. It’s never going to be material physical objects are aware of consciousness. There’s a very subtle difference, but it’s the same one consciousness the always existing fundamental substrate dreaming difference where there is none. Ultimately, there’s nothing inside or outside of consciousness, it’s one singular consciousness, there’s no other consciousness.

No word can define what is, or, every word defines it.

Can a closed fist receive a gift?

Consciousness can only be conscious of consciousness. Consciousness cannot know it is conscious without splitting itself in half as a subject and object duality. This duality is still only consciousness conscious of consciousness. Therefore , a machine can never be aware, or know its creator, because consciousness and the content of consciousness is always one indivisible consciousness. There’s literally nothing inside or outside of consciousness. Strange, but true.