Schizophonia

This makes them less nutritious, but there are some foods you definitely don't want to eat unprocessed (raw legumes). As long as your diet isn't based on twinkies it should be ok.

Come live the “crazy libertarian nomad dream” with me. We will live in a caravan and we will eat children.

1) I have very little empathy in general, you are right. 2) I have very good pain endurance, in fact, if I were not afraid of the health and physical risks I would take pleasure in lightly scarifying myself. Maybe you can put me in the box you want: Atypical, sociopathic, psychopathic, antisocial... It doesn't change much.

lol

Strange, for me it's a stimulant of some sort. Not att all, at least for esketamine. What the difference with ketamine ?

I tried clomid and it gave me vivid nightmares. People high in catecholamines are more likely to have nightmares. That's all I know.

Are you on medication? Certain medications can cause nightmares

Once I was on no fap for a month, my balls were so full that even with my 130 qi points I was scammed 50 euros in paysafecard code by a fake escort. I'm still ashamed.

@Buck Edwards Too late, I also send you a big kiss. lol

It's true, arithmetically this sentence makes sense. But it is not because the sentence is logical that what it tells is rational. I am of course targeting the “value” part and all that it tacitly implies. I don't know, I've felt a powerful feeling of love for certain people before, for some reason. This is unlikely to happen unless you become particularly sadistic. The change would rather be "I don't care", I would say that the first step would be to contemplate to what extent animals dying or not dying changes nothing in your life. Your brain always chooses the best possibility for your libdinal agenda, in certain contexts denial is considered the best possibility. This is just an interpretation, but I think that the only principle for the existence of such notions is nihilism (in the Nietzchean sense of the term), because the idea of a violent, merciless and absolutely unjust nature makes you too afraid, by inference more or less aware of what this means for you, you then melt into a new paradigm on layers of idealism to hide the truth from yourself. This includes regression narcissism, or why many "unattractive" people fall into marginal diets (including veganism, and more extreme/marginal forms like fruit eating), into simply religions (and the uglier they are, the more they are in extreme delusions, look at the faces of the jihadists). It’s a way to finally give yourself the right to give love. No What reasons? For my part it's pretty clear, I don't want to attack a human because I don't want to go to prison, and because I can have friendly/sexual relations with them. This is not possible with animals.

I have to find it, I'll do my research. ?

It was very different from 5 meo mipt. Mipt looked like mushrooms, but quite brutal. Always much tidier, with psychedelic visuals like machine scapes.

I am a law student, if you give me 1000 euros we will build a case and I will recover these 30,000 dollars from you, even if it is basically a scam (especially because it is a scam). Promised.

Sometimes I wonder what it would be like if we were like cats. Like in high school a schedule where people stop working and "clean themselves", me licking my balls while my friend licks his girlfriend's ass while pulling out the excess hair. Lol

I would gas entire families with zyklon b to save my life.

What do you mean by loving animals? What animals? Do you like wild boars? Are you going to go into the forest to try to find a wild boar to give it a hug (before it charges you, lol)? Do you like Hitler? Hitler is a human, therefore an animal. But if it really isn't hypocritical and you really "love animals", assuming that it means something, then probably yes it's rational not to eat them. But personally, I don't really give a damn about animals, the only thing that comes to mind if I want to take care of someone is to have a child. Seems a lot more logical than getting a stupid and useless dog or cat. You can be vegan and live on chips. It's not really related. You're playing with semantics, I'm not interested. By morality everyone understands a set of principles with a universal vocation. I am not a linguist, but for me making “egoism” compatible with the principle of morality makes this notion particularly shaky and useless. Following my interests is rational, since my experience is the only thing I can perceive. This includes being “virtuous” if I believe in a theological system that threatens me with disobedience. But if not, then it is irrational. Yes I do. Most humans would refuse because it would be too disruptive to their habitual paradigm since their existence, but my brain has been exposed to many more stressors than normal so killing someone is pretty easy for me. (This doesn't mean I'm sadistic and want to kill people) No, it's a question of brain neuroplasticity. For the same reason that people like me buy substances in BTC on the dark net without batting an eyelid, while others tremble with stress because they are about to smoke a joint, for the same reason that men in the Middle Ages, although much more religious, were more violent than modern Europeans, although they were atheists. Anything disruptive is avoided. This is absolutely the case, what else do you want it to be? why would you want your brain not to go your way? lol. Everything that emanates from you aims to come back to you, everything has a selfish vocation from A to Z if you dig deep enough. What I think is that there are particularly narcissistic people and that regressive gratifications overwhelmingly outweigh "phalic" gratifications (I'm stealing a bit from the Freudian/Lacanian system lol, but it works well), and that as a result these people love to embody the “camp of good” and make up a significant part of political and societal groups based on such a paradigm. And there are other people who aren't interested in that. Have you noticed that vegans are more likely to be left-wing, "progressive" or on the contrary in rarer cases neo-Nazis, and that pro-carnivore/Keto/Priml diets are more likely to be libertarians and /or a slightly “agrarian” conservative and prefer to live in the provinces? Of course, because everything is connected, it's just a matter of libidinal investment strategies. No, animals are not going to have sex and romantic/friendly relationships with me, they are not going to pay taxes to pay for my retirement and health care costs, they are not going to treat me, they are not going to make me/ serve food in a restaurant, etcetc. In other words, I have plenty of pragmatic reasons to cooperate with humans, almost none with other animals. Anti-speciesism is like declaring that a random dog, wild boar or praying mantis should have as much right as a human who works and actually contributes to the social contract, it makes absolutely no sense. Yes, but we come back to the original problem. You consider egoism ethical, that may be true, I don't know, but that's not the way the notion is usually invoked. Maybe the next week end or the other (beginning of November), i you can/want. We can rcord if you want for the forum, lol.

Mirtazapine is above all a very powerful anti-histamine at 15 mg. But it has a half-life of at least 20 hours, so I often feel stupid with a mild migraine during the day. Benadryl has a low half-life of supposedly 6 hours, which is why I mentioned it. I don't want to touch any medication that decreases dopamine.

I would like but : -I have to go to sleep. -I speak English like a Hindu pharmaceutical wholesaler, lol But I'll think about it..

This concept seems as shaky as “anarcho-socialist”. Afterwards why not, but it is generally not in this context that people invoke the notion of morality. ?‍♂️ agree I won't kill her, because it wouldn't be worth it to risk getting caught for just 50 euros. Yes, but something done thoughtfully is not necessarily moral. Otherwise premeditated murder would be “moral”. And what is the importance of acting punctually or not? A thoughtless/one-off act may or may not produce good results, the same goes for a thoughtful act. Btw, killing an animal isn't really one-off/"instinctive", it takes time and preparation. If you give me money and I'm sure no one will ever know, yes I do. There is no reason not to do it except if they are friends, in this case I want to keep their presence. So what ? It's true that average humans, especially modern humans, have a certain level of empathy, and some have a lot of it. But it seems to me that that's not really what we mean by "moral" because it's just biology. Is killing if you are a psychopath moral? It's like being a carnivorous animal somewhere, isn't it? It is just a system invented by Kant, based on a theological paradigm. I am not a Christian. The social contract is pragmatic, it's not really about morality in the universal sense, as we can understand it. Money Why do something you won't benefit from? It's as if it didn't exist. That's all there is. Whatever ? What do I gain from it, if not the (still egotic) gratification "oh, I do good, I'm the good side, blablabla" ? If that's so, not interested in "regressive anal sadist" rewards. ? No, it's very simple and rational. No You think what you want, of course ? I don't see any place where I have been "intellectually dishonest"

Someone in my family worked with people with Down syndrome (or at least retarded people, I don't know) and apparently they were a bit like that, lol. There are also these bonobo monkeys who have sex to say hello.

Yes. I have no "values", I only follow my interests. No, you can act thoughtfully (not instinctively) without being aligned with any moral value system. Otherwise it would mean that a serial killer who acts with premeditation is a very moral person, which makes no sense. Ditto No, semantics have nothing to do with the moral question, whether or not you agree with me on what is rational or not. No, I said it's rational to continue eating meat if it's in your interest or you don't care, it's also rational not to if it makes you disturbs (so it is not in your interest). But it's a question of mirror neurons, not "morale".

It's a catch 22, it totally fixes my insomnia but makes me stupid. Next experiment: H1 antihistamine with very short half-life, like benadryl.

No actually, is it a manual that can be found at Fnac? lol. It is about limiting one's possible field of action according to arbitrary laws, and in a "disinterested" manner (in a theological paradigm, not fishing in the hope of going to paradise is intelligent, pragmatic, but it is no longer a question of being "moral"). In other words, obey without flinching the law of a system that has been put in your head even though you do not believe in any form of punishment. There is absolutely no reason to deprive yourself of killing an animal to eat it (among other things, but here the subject is veganism) if you do not believe in divine punishment. Deprive yourself of killing an animal by removing the notions of "moral", "ethics", "justification" or "excuse" when you are an atheist and/or are not convinced of any kind of punishment is the stupidest/irrational thing you can do. I've already said it 50 times but no one can answer me, at least without the response being a quick ad hominem, or simply drowning the point by paraphrasing what has already been said by multiplying useless concepts and providing an answer. more complicated/boring. Of course there is no possible reason, because I am only explaining very simple and tangible observations and resonances.

You got screwed for being too lazy to work and hoping to find a magic potion. Cheat codes only work on GTA, eh.