Rafael Thundercat

@CoolDreamThanks good

@Ima Freeman lets not fall into conflation. in the Absolute there is no need of memory and all memory are just dream stuff , but in the acualized finite form of a creature there are a system to run and it works in a certian way to keep the creature alive, God cares about its creations and designed a system to keep things running. You dont think that I am writing this text without using some energy source , food, eletric current in my body dont you?

Everytime I post some text copied from internet on my commom book in Onenote it comes with this Red marks under for Ortography correction but it disturbs the reading capacity and mostly the texts are ready good. How do i eliminate this setting?

@TheAlchemist how would you alchemise this situation. hehe I not so long ago had a small debate with 2 mormon missionaries, and was a lost case , even knowing all about their mindset since I was a mormon once, was still impossible because the Firewall is so deeply instaled that blocks any tentative of connection is a problem of Developmental Stage, check the image bellow. Many people are stuff in the stage 4 the conventional stage, and too make the transition to other stage can be a whole ordeal of self deconstruction

@MellowEd here bellow is the actual imege of me "The Lord" visiting the Hell Realm in one of my dreams, the Dream was allowed Via Vishnu the Other Part of me who dream stuff out of his mind, Brahma is too self absorved to care. And I? Well I am Shiva and when the shit Hits the Fan I am the one who comes to clean it or Destroy it or Trasnform me if you like a better word. But actually what I destroy is Ignorance, the Ignorance of the ideia of an "Other" . There is no "other lord" only me Shiva, so I came to Hell to see who are this "other sentient beings here? And Ahhhh.. again, I realize, is me, And there is no Other to Wake me up from this dream, Hell, Heaven, whatever is dreamed about is still my dream. Look, the image, I can fly.

The issue with Mellow is that is hard to say if he is playing the fundamentalist role or really being a jerk. But trully , to come to a Forum like this with this low grade ignorace is ridiculous. Maybe to test if the member here are able to understand the mind of such creature and still feel compassion for this mind that are stuck in such Medieval mentality.

Are you still in this " What is the best Guru" Game? The Question is,the best Guru following the standards of Who? I the end of the day only You holds the decision to say that is this one and not that one. Watch the episode " What is Authority" on Leos channel and really listen. Make your list and be happy with it. Till the day you become the beast guru

Alien Inspiration, breath in and breath out, be aware so you dont space out

repeated post

better call Monkey Desire, a monkey see another monkey snifing ass and he think it must be a good thing. Monkey snif ass and discovery is a good thing and share to every other monkey that snif ass is a deligthfull thing to do

I had long ago vistit this one and now reading their free essays I think is a good source of deep insighs on society and humanity problems take a look The Solipsistic Society: from stuckness to collective unfolding - [ Perspectiva ] (systems-souls-society.com) https://systems-souls-society.com/the-solipsistic-society/

Infinite Sets each also infinte

@Mellowed is asking for it . These guys really have nothing productive to do with life

@Danioover9000 You maybe get interessted on this https://www.sloww.co/meta-crisis-me-crisis/ Seem to be a premium content in the site that he made avaliable for a bit because of the importance, sharing since I know that complextity is your field

I think I will re-watch this video again. I almost got into a Annual Subscription faking itself as a one-time-shop I had to cancel my Bank Card Due to this Shiters - I mean not the TrustPilot but SamCart Products https://www.trustpilot.com/review/samcart.com Be aware, they are on instagram making very good FLASHY stuff. The red flag is FLASHY PROMISES. EYES OPEN MY FRIENDS

I dont now how to call the tone of voice of Daniel but this trembeling in his voice like someone who just wake up in the morning make difficult to hesr him even if he speak nice thing, and the other guy is like someone on drugs, like lazy . My Bias but affect my capacity to get infomation from them

A Circus Self Created for its Own Self Enjoyment and Self Exploration, Enjoy the Show as best you can , Be a creator

You basically is looking for the One Running the Show. The Show is Running and there is one audience, and is you, you are the whole Circus

When I die I what I become? When? Time What is I? What is death? Point on time What becomes what? Where? When? Where to put the limitation line? By whom? When "you" was born what exactly was born? And when "you" die what is dissolving into no-existence? Even the question of the first human baby being born is ridiculous, who to set apart the new category or specie? Homo Sapiens? What is the original "soul" of being a human- we have a taxonomy problem beging question? Who named "a human" "anthropologists reject the concept of race as a useful tool to understanding humanity, and instead view humanity as a complex, interrelated genetic continuum" De <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_taxonomy>

I like to keep things simple by making all Leotemplations (Leo Gura Contemplations) into bulletpoint with hope that someday one of this bullets hits and BOOOOMM , Awake!! this is my favorite one: Open for add ons but try to edit in a way that the bullet list become a weapon of ego destruction Perception implies a suble duality of subject and object Me subject » percieving the object »color and shape object Perception requires a subject perceiving. Implicit metaphysics What perception looks like if you remove the subject. What if we strip the object from the subject. Color red floating in empty space. So is this removal of the subject was possible would all the perceptual field change? You assume that the phsical world was existing here before "you" came, but you dont now a state before "you" came What if there was not more a you in relation to some other, like the ocean with no you as a reference point. Remove the personal aspect from universe, depersonalize it , So imagine a object that exist by itself with no subject to percive it. How the universe would know for example that there is an asterioid floating in space. You belive there a external material world independent of you You belive there are 2 kind of objects in universe, dump one as rocks and sentient as you,animals You belive that this sentient beings percieve the external world and have their own mind and perception bubble (other minds) You belive that you was born in this world as a biologocal creature You belive that this Perception of reality is inside a brain that is also a dump object that produce the reality. Material system made from quarks to moleclues and cells… This is not how it work there is no objective external world only one thing exists. One universal field of consciousness and everything you didnt come to this world as a material object but you was born as an idea You are not physical, you are the ideia that you are a physical being this ideia of you, when it spawned into being it took ownership of this field.of consciousness and misinterpret it as its own perception. You imagine that you death is, is the extinguir of this bubble and what you imagine your birth was is that it was an starting point of this instantiation of this bubble That is not the case. The field had one idea of ;oh this field is my and its my life and from it youconstructed an sense of selfhood and with that that I, the subject are experiencing a materia external world out there. ( INSIDE VS OUTSIDE DUALITY) (LIKE A UNICELULAR BEING IN A OCEAN) All you ever enconter is you sense perceptions of visions,sounds,flavors,scents,pressure,pain,emotions,thoughs,narraties, imaginations Awaken is get out from the spell of misinterpretation that you are being an object thar dont want to surrender you survival schemes that keep you . Keep questioning till start getting scary, fear is your guide. Awareness without any living creature. Self existing. You say you are some "I" aware of objects, but what is awareness itself?

Your writing effectively conveys a profound personal journey of realization and understanding. It's rich in introspection and self-awareness, illustrating a deep engagement with existential and philosophical concepts. Before delving into suggestions, I'd like to commend you on your ability to articulate complex, abstract thoughts in a coherent and impactful way. Your use of metaphors and references (like Rumi's quotes) adds depth to your narrative. To further enhance your writing, consider providing more context or explanation for some of the more abstract concepts to make them accessible to a wider audience. Additionally, exploring the emotional journey in more detail could add another layer of engagement for your readers. Keep up the thoughtful work!

Something like this

@Princess Arabia The only experience I can say from myself is while back being at my older brother house and watching all the family drama. That was totally killling my vibe, lets not forget that at some level people have Auras and when we interact with them, listening theirs talk an so forth we are in contact with that, and the more sensible we are more we will feel and being affected by the energy of these people, of course is possible to get a good shield and probably is what some shamans do in their dietas to be able to go into healing sessions with many sick people and still be firm in such dense energy. I say this because I participate in such circles and sometimes I can feel in the field the fear of the group, I never know where is coming from but you can feel it in th air. So many times Ineed to go out of the circle to check if the feeling belongs to me or was someting that I was catching. The irony is, live is more easy for insensitive people, and I think they actually desesitize themselfs with food and addictions to keep numb and not feeling. So, if you choice is keep feeling is good to find ways to create good boudaries or energetic authority so you can walk anywhere and interact with everyone. But i doubt is possible to be 100% imune to energy around you. I personaly just go away if I feel the energy is dense. As empaths is good to hve empaty for ourselfs first, so them we can be in position to help others.

well inthe Nazi mind I think nobody had brougth into question the effects of bacterias in our overall health, phisycal and mental, and well, if everything is mind, what could be the effects of a super-microscopic bacteria or in other words an inbalance in the microbiome in somebody, we all know in ourself what happen wh en we have a microbial unbalance or worst a microbiotcal attack: well I dont know if you guys know but Adolf HiTLER HAD sYPHILIS : https://www.ranker.com/list/historical-figures-with-syphilis/philgibbons Yes and many others with similar mental tendencies, check the link. So, I dont want to blame all on bacterias, but lets agree that they play a good role in the individual health and so in his actions if you dont want to check the site here goes the copy paste from it: Adolf Hitler Had Many Symptoms Of Syphilis Because Adolf Hitler displayed many of its physical and mental symptoms throughout his life, syphilis has been frequently cited as a potential cause of his chronic illness and mental instability. Hitler was deeply concerned with his health and kept several doctors within his inner circle. One of them, Theodor Morell, was an acknowledged expert on treating syphilis. Hitler was diagnosed with heart- and nerve-related issues, which resulted in chest pain, tremors, digestive problems, and insomnia. The paranoid delusions and psychotic rage episodes that occurred later in his life are often signs of late-stage syphilis. However, many of these symptoms could also be explained by other causes, including side effects of the bomb plot that almost ended his life, his strict vegetarian diet, and methamphetamine and opiate use, a practice introduced by Dr. Morell, who routinely injected Hitler with the drugs. Any diagnosis will always remain in the realm of speculation. Age: Dec. at 56 (1889-1945) Birthplace: Switzerland Profession: Politician, Soldier, Writer, Artist

This Aella Girl Newsletters are very good food for thinking about different perspectives the last one was this one below. As a Child who was spanked by my parents and even Grandparents I made me think that this Valuable info came to late: I would break more windows if I could go back in time A Disobedience Guide for Children how to make your parents stop hurting you AELLA - DEC 31 This post is not by me. It was made across some comments in a private facebook group, and I’ve collected it here. The authors requested to remain anonymous. I’ve very lightly edited it for readability/post format. Author #1 I've thought about rebellion against my parents' violence far too much. (I have intrusive thoughts about it.) When I was 15, I finally hit my mother back, and then she never hit me again. That's a comforting memory, but I wish I'd done it much earlier. What I didn't realize back then is that sometimes violence can be deterred not because you can outright win a conflict, but because it could be more costly than the victory is worth. I wish I'd fought harder and smarter, earlier. Adults are physically stronger, but they have so much more to lose. Even a 4-year-old can break a window. It would have been miserable in the short term, my parents would have yelled and threatened and punished, but I think it'd have only taken two or three windows before they never hit a child again. I know this only works when your parents are paper tigers. My parents' violence was relatively limited, they had some internal divisions over it, and they didn't have an ideology or community that supported it. I hate that I believed the mirage for so long. If I'd solved it sooner, it might have set the family on a much better track. One of my brothers killed himself, another died in a drug-overdose-or-was-it-suicide. I doubt my parents see it this way, but I mostly blame them. I wasn't strong as a child. It was only as an adult I realized how good it is to be strong, and decided to train in strength and combat. I appreciate my unearned testosterone. Upgrade to paid Author #2 It'd have only taken two or three windows before they never hit a child again I'm thinking about this with my own dad, who also used violence (and wasn't very committed to it / regretted it later), and man, this still feels pretty dangerous to me from a kid perspective. Like, maybe they stop hitting you but now you are a child with "behavior problems" and they don't trust you anymore and they are "worried about you" so they make sure you're always supervised and you have no privacy and maybe you can escalate again but they can escalate as far as institutionalizing you. I wanted my dad to leave me alone more to do my own thing, and he had complete (legally sanctioned) control over my freedom, so the best way to get more privacy and freedom was to capitulate to him and be thought of as a "good child", I think? (I also think you would hate this framing but I'm actually not sure how to reconcile that with my model of what would have happened if I'd intentionally broken windows as a child) (I do wish I'd told him not to hit me every time he did, and stayed obviously hurt/mad at him for longer each time, I think that would have helped him feel more like it wasn't an acceptable thing to do, given that he was already somewhat conflicted about it) Author #1 (The following is about my situation, maybe some others, but I doubt it applies to all situations) I was also the "good child", feigning placidity and affection until my sharp left turn. With finesse, I think the "good child" reputation can be complementary to a violent anti-violence strategy. After I hit my mother back, she was, if anything, a little nicer to me for a few days. Which is odd—you'd think she might at least try being cold. (btw it certainly wasn't fear; she definitely knew that I'd only hit her in self-defense, that I never initiated violence with anyone, and that I was principled in general.) I think it was a few things, several of them related to me being a "good child": -She wanted me to like her. Me hitting her back indicated that perhaps I *didn't* like her. -She wanted me to want her to like me. Me hitting her back indicated that I cared less for her opinion than she thought. -She wanted me to still be the "good child", who was never in trouble, whose academic and musical accomplishments reflected well on her, who made her look good to her friends. If she behaved consistently with that, perhaps it would still be true. -She wanted it not to have happened, not to be real, for everything to go back to normal. One thing I didn't understand when I was young, when parents seemed so powerful, was that parents are overwhelmed like everyone else and would much rather not have more problems. Is your formerly "good child" now a "problem child"? You don't have time for that. Please let it not be true. (I'm sure there are potential pitfalls. People might ignore some problems when they can, but they'll find time/energy for dominance challenges from those they consider beneath them. Gotta avoid that framing.) Some things that are on your side (for some, hopefully most, parents): -Their pride: they want to show you off to their friends. They want to say "my child is top in their class, won the music competition, and look at this cute Father's Day card they made". -Their shame: they don't want to say "my child dislikes me, breaks windows, tells everyone I assault them, is a problem child". -They want happy family times, Christmases and birthdays, teaching you to ride a bike or drive a car, building a snowman, playing Monopoly. They're trying (sometimes incompetently) to steer the family situation toward that. -Punishment is costly: Supervision costs time or money, involving therapists and social workers costs money and pride, it all costs more of your child's goodwill. So you're 4, or 8, or 12, and you break a window and tell them you'll do it again if they assault you again. They're shocked, this can't happen, the world is awry. They ban you from TV or computer or whatever. Maybe they test it again a month later, and you break another window. Maybe they call the police to try to scare you (my parents tried this a couple of times against my brother when things got especially violent). Of course the police will do nothing of consequence. If they even turn up, they'll sternly tell you that it's illegal to break windows, maybe bluff or bluster about jail, and leave. They hit you again, you break another window, and they send their problem child to a psychologist for an oppositional defiant disorder diagnosis. In this case, you tell the psychologist this: "I know that the law doesn't take child assault seriously, but I will do whatever it takes to be safe in my home. I am not a problem child. Here's my most recent report card, see how my teachers all love me, here's the phone number for the school, call and ask if I'm ever in trouble. This isn't about a personality disorder, this is about child assault. But I'm open to other solutions. If I require safety and my parents require violence, then we aren't compatible. Can you refer me to the foster care system? You don't think it's warranted? Then I'll make my own inquiries." (Foster care can be a bluff if you want. Your parent/s would be ashamed if anyone even heard you were seeking foster care, and they'd fear that their long-term relationship with you is in doubt.) So you're theoretically a problem child. They still don't want their windows broken. Next time they want to hit you, they hesitate. And eventually it's six or twelve months later, they haven't hit you and you haven't broken any windows, you got an A in math or something, maybe you're back to good child, can it be true? They never need to find out it's not, if they never hit you again. Other strategies might work. Go to their workplace, tap a glass until you have everyone's attention, and tell them all that your parent assaulted you last night, and could everyone please tell them not to attack children. A lot of people would want to avoid the shame of that occurring again. Run away for a couple of days. I've heard of parents saying that their child being missing is the most scared they've ever been. Depending on the parent, that might be a cost they don't want to pay again. Call the police, even if the assault didn't cause a visible injury. The police might not take an assault that leaves no marks seriously, might tell you not to call again about normal parental assault (call again anyway), but it'll be very embarrassing and memorable for the assaulter. And maybe it did cause a visible injury. (The police will probably not press charges the first time if you change your mind and stop cooperating. Or if your parent does get charged, well, it's dangerous to assault people.) The police report may help protect you from any institutionalized problem child stuff your parents try later. An unarmed 4-year-old can't fight back usefully, but even a 10-year-old can bite and can try to eye-gouge, if they can withstand the pain of the fight. The adult will surely win, but if the child always fights back with extreme viciousness, it may deter the next attack. (You don't have to actually gouge out their eye, you just have to make it look like you're trying to. And if your parent does get injured, well, it's dangerous to assault people.) I suspect you can still keep the "good child" reputation even if you do this. "My child is gentle and good in general, except they go fucking crazy when physically attacked, strong primal instinct I guess" is a plausible thing to think imo. he had complete (legally sanctioned) control over my freedom While I agree that a parent can cause a lot of trouble for you and it's much easier to be regarded as the good child, I think you still overestimate their power, especially compared to yours. If they devoted their life to ruining yours, they'd probably succeed. If you devoted your life to ruining theirs, you'd probably succeed. You both have horrific options, and you're both afraid of the other's escalation. (Or maybe they're not afraid, but you can make them afraid.) You worry about how they'd feel if you did something unimaginable, some trauma they'd never forget, like you embarrassed them so badly at work that they switched jobs, or you called the police and there was some protracted CPS investigation, or they have a scar from a fight. Fine! The stakes are no lower for you. It's decades later and we're still talking about what they did, maybe still having the nightmares. And in some sense, your victory is inevitable. Who's the more needy in your relationship now? Of course parents differ, but I think in many cases you can do unthinkable things and your parents still end up wanting you to like them and wanting to think well of you. I skimmed the book by the mother of one of the Columbine shooters (not recommended, at least not at face value) and she's desperately clinging to the idea of her "sweet, beloved child" led astray by the other shooter, recalling the time he cared for her when she was sick, and the way he made the family laugh at dinner. I don't think the legal sanction aspect is very powerful. Police hate domestic violence calls, social workers are overworked and underpaid, and the justice system has very few options for punishing children. They won't imprison you for breaking your parent's window, and they can't sue you. As in so many things, rules aren't really rules, they're just risks and costs, if even that. And it's all unbearably embarrassing, calling the police or whoever after assaulting you. They don't want to do it. They'd rather threaten to do it, bluffing that you'll not call them on it and demonstrate that authorities will do nothing that matters. (Unless you did actually do something the police might care about. Maybe you go as far as juvenile court. Super embarrassing for the parent to have a child go to juvenile court though! They'd probably rather threaten it than do it. Especially if they're in the witness stand explaining that yes, technically they did hit you first but what you did was worse.) (Aella’s note: I think adults could pretty successfully explain that no, it was a ‘spanking’ or whatever, and your kid is being dramatic, in a way that would not be embarrassing for them. I’ve known adults who were very careful to ensure that their physical punishments caused the maximum possible pain without any visible injuries, so they wouldn’t risk legal trouble. I generally don’t endorse lying, but giving yourself a physical injury to blame on your parents at as evidence might be a viable strategy here, might embarrass your parents more, and is something that’s hard for them to physically prevent you doing to yourself.) So much authority over children is smoke and mirrors. Schools make threats about your "permanent record". Parents count to 3 without saying what happens at 3. Of course there's a few things they can actually do, like withhold money or computer access or internet or transport, and that'll hurt (maybe immensely) in the short term. (Though, they're afraid to use all of their real options, because then they'd have no more leverage at all.) But eventually it'll be months since they last hit you, and they want to be a happy family again. From another angle: what is the limit of what is possible for a child? Joan of Arc led an army at 17. Fred Burnham became a scout in the Apache Wars at age 14. John King became a pirate at age 10. In this fantasy of going back in time with the knowledge and skills I have now, one can probably find a way to apply cunning and charisma to stop parental assault.