Davino

“Now is the moment to throw yourself into the Mercy of the Almighty as one without shelter and support. Leap into God's embrace and you will be released from cares. Remember that it is the pure crazy who shall find God.” ~ Sri Anandamayi Ma

To be God is True Happiness. ~God

I don't understand what you mean.

I did have that realization but with time Solipsism matured in me. Now I see a boundless Consciousness Field which is Reality itself morphing into sensations at every moment and that shines through everyone's eyes. At an Absolute level I am Infinity I am God, The One. Yet this Infinity replicates itself into multiplicity and that is when human-me and other-Is happen. This is what Leo talked about in the video of Infinite Gods, that is Solipsism matured. The mindfuck is how every realization can coexist simultaenously and even contradictorily. My Mind can shape itself into so many perspectives, combinations of them and states of Consciousness that it's even hard to have a preference for one over the other, infinite relativity meets infinite love, for the miracle of existence happening in every breath.

Imo, Leo miscalculated when erasing the distinction between ego solipsism and Absolute Solipsism. The first one is incomplete because even though finite mind cannot grasp beyond itself, neither can negate others; while Infinite Universal Mind is One and All.

Actually when you succeed in connecting with everything, Solipsism happens.

Other minds can exist within Mind. As a matter of fact this body and mind are happening inside Consciousness and so does everybody else. Reality can probe itself in as many ways as it wants. One consciousness, infinite perspectives. The Infinite Consciousness Field, loops itself in an I-hole through which the individual sees and taints consciousness in different states like coloured fractured glass. Moreover, Infinity can recreate itself fully at every spot. There's so much nuance to Solipsism, it really gets very intricate. Lately, I've been having sharper revelations.

Absolutely, this is the piece I was missing. Thanks a lot @Cireeric

So what do you do when they consistently ask you?

@ExploringReality You box very smoothly, I like your style. A few technical comments: Work more on your jab, it's underdeveloped in comparison with the rest of your game. You use your hand to measure distance and make the oponent uncomfortable. That's nice but it usually works better when you have the reach advantatge, which is not usually the case by the sparring videos you showed and your body constitution. I like to do it to blind their sight and throw something unexpected. You sometimes throw the cross without setup, which is nice if you got the timing right, but it's good practice to always set it up with a jab or even double jab and then throwing the bomb. Otherwise, throw the cross directly while they are moving to your dominant hand. It's common to get countered when throwing a cross directly as you expose yourself more and it's a slower punch. Sometimes you faint punches that are clearly not gonna hit to "distract" the rival. This doesn't work imo, fake it to hit it. I like to throw hard punches and then trigger fear by following with faints while I recover stamina. --- And a personal advice of mine. Always throw the first and last punch in a round. What I most liked: you are technical and composed, you move nicely and own the ring. Most importantly, you enter into the flow, you are in the zone, which is key in competition.

@MarkKol Congrats for getting out of debt.

Another big factor is time. If we have 2 dedicated hours to discuss the topic, then I'll be able to present my nuanced view. However, most casual conversations are 10min long for topic at best. This presents a very hard restriction on high quality communication.

I see. Thanks for taking the time to answer.

@Carl-Richard Maybe more context is needed. We were reading a 'philosophical' text on sexism in french and Italian language class. After the explicit understanding we went deeper and I was asked good inquiries on the topic. I wasn't directly called out sexist because I expressed myself more or less correctly, but they said my view could easily be misinterpreted as sexist and that I should be careful, which is true. So it got me thinking.

You're so right. I encounter this problem often. In the spectrum from tangible to abstract my mind is very abstract. I feel like giving examples would enhance a lot my communication skills. It just doesn't come as naturally but it has worked me well when I've taken the effort to find powerful examples.

I found this strategy hilarious

@Someone here Your intellectual development surpasses your moral development; a dynamic that, in daily life conversations, can be just as problematic as the reverse. Can't wait for your message intellectually piercing through morality. In this way you trap yourself. Please consider you wouldn't hold this position if this happened to your nation, your friends and family, your house bombed, your little sister starved to death etc. It's an intellectual vacuum where you contemplate. War would crash our souls, our generation doesn't even have a point of reference, we live in bubbles of comfort. So let's be as intellectually developed as we are morally and point out corruption and devilry from a place of high standards for humanity.

These are savages. The record is from Naim ''Pocket Hercules'' Süleymanoğlu.

Very interesting what you posted about The Boy Who Could Read With His Ears What blows my mind is how the survival drive of agencies trumps traditional science and metaphysics just for having the edge. It's quite astonishing to see how they consider such radical possibilities just to have a survival advantatge even if it goes against all common scientific knowledge. Btw, I loved the last quote from the CIA:

@Hojo But you're trying to apply infinite logic to a finite concept -DNA- which doesn't work. If you argue for infinity inside finity that is also true but has another logic which is not being covered by your arguments.

@Hojo Yes, you mention the branch of tantra I was pointing out earlier as quite limited. If that's what you were talking about then I agree with you. I'm pointing to a richer world you can discover through conscious sex and kundalini.

Why? I don't see that logical step. Could you explain it to me. I would love to understand your perspective. I don't know how DNA works honestly

That's just a candle compared with the sun. If you only saw the candle and stopped what else can be said. Practice more or at least don't come as if you knew. It's like saying meditation is bs. Of course it's going to feel blissfull and liberating when there are no thoughts. It's such a superficial commentary. Beyond this, I wanna make you aware to contemplate: Do I actually know? This is the question. Because maybe we don't and that's totally fine. I still consider myself a beginner in kundalini. In fact I have it hundreds of times harder to work with kundalini than you. I have a medical condition in my spine which makes it be in an s-shape and everytime I work with this energy it hurts like a real bitch, it's a very difficult process to navigate those turns in comparison with those who have a straight spine. Yet what do I do? I keep grinding and working because I know its potential and I have seen what is capable of doing, of healing of awakening. Though I know it will take me decades if ever, to have kundalini flowing as it should in my sushumna.