Consept

Ok so it seems like you're putting a lot of your contentment in the hands of your ex but also potentially, in the hands of a future gf. Point being take responsibility for yourself and become self-sufficient, your life shouldn't be based around you getting a girlfriend. What I'd advise is to get to a stage where you don't 'need' a girl but maybe you want to spend time with a girl. Meaning it's actually rather than something you think you have to do. I'd actually say read books like 'way of the superior man' and 'models', also maybe some pua stuff like rsd. This is just to get you out of your current psychology, not saying become a pua necessarily. You say you want to go to India but you seem to have a lot of things that you haven't fully understood and let go of yet. I'd say just live your life and do what you need to do for you, once you get to that stage you can make a better informed decision like going to India or whatever else

Bob Marley John Lennon Michael Jackson Tupac Hopsin

The film Lucy is similar to the matrix, it shows a woman going from orange all the way to turquoise and above, but is kind of weird because of the action side of it but I liked it. Also highly recommend 'Her' also with Scarlett Johansson, man falls in love with his os but his os is constantly evolving and develops consciousness above the man, really liked this film actually, anyone seen it?

Just to preface im not christian or any religion really but i stumbled upon this guys videos, he generally does break downs of symbolism in popular culture. I didnt actually realise he was christian til quite a few videos in. He doesnt try and explain that there is a material god etc but he does explain how god exists, which i found quite interesting so just sharing, ive posted the vid below but if you look on his channel theres some more good vids. I believe hes a yellow thinker, which ive never seen in people that identify as religious so thats why he peaked my interest

What I found interesting with this whole series of events is the karma and negative energy started off by McGregor and then condoned by the UFC in a way to make as much money as possible. Obviously McGregor says crazy stuff in fight build ups which I was likened to pro wrestling in the show and theatre of it, like he's playing a character, which can have negative effects if the other fighter isn't in on it (but even this is bad enough). But when McGregor attacked the bus, actually injuring other fighters and then it being condoned and even rewarded by the UFC, he introduced a karma into the sport that can really ruin it if it continues. UFC had the opportunity to ban him or at least suspend him for a year or so but they chose not to because they knew how much money they could make from him, so essentially putting money ahead of integrity. I do believe there's loads of positive aspects of MMA, the discipline , the dedication of the sport and for me, I know there's a lot of people here that will say it's 2 chimps bla bla, but actually it does a great job of moving people from red to blue consciousness and can also help with ongoing discipline, so anything that can move people forward is good imo. But cut to Saturday night, because of the lack of integrity of the UFC, Khabib knows if he takes the actions he did nothing will happen to him, which means he has no respect for the UFC with good reason, although I'm not condoning his actions. So you can see that really it's the UFC's actions that have lead to this and Dana White can say it's disgusting but they set the scene to allow this to happen. On a wider scale this action by Khabib, if it's not punished, will be seen as one to aspire to by youngsters watching, which will completely destroy any kind of positive karma the UFC does put into the world. So to conclude this is a case of money over integrity

33 feeling old at all the teenagers in here lol. It's really cool a lot of people starting so young, I wouldn't have been able to get my head around this stuff at that age

I think he's decent, I watch some of his stuff. Why I think it's good is because it becomes more relatable if it's someone who's is younger and talks in the same kind of way you may talk and has the same references etc. It also demystifies some teachings, essentially all teachings are similar but it's really they're conveyed and how you can practically use it. If what he says resonates with you then go for it. I think a lot of the time we worry about the teacher rather than the message, which I guess you should to an extent, but if what he's saying makes sense to you then take if it doesn't then don't. Also in Juliens particular case I think the media scandal thing really humbled him, and it was a big gamble to go into this type of content coming from pick up, as he would've lost a lot of people who just liked him for that. So for me he is so what authentic

Check out my podcast all about this subject - https://soundcloud.com/financialthoughts/financialthoughtsep2

http://rational-buddhism.blogspot.com/2012/01/buddhism-quantum-physics-and-mind.html?m=1 https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buddhism_and_science?wprov=sfla1 To be honest there's lots of stuff, I hesitate to try and 'prove' anything to you as that's something you need to see for yourself, but have a look at what I've posted and then go down the rabbit hole yourself

(Apologies for the double quote) in the article it says that there are a variety of theories that have come about from them 'switching consciousness off' one of which is that consciousness comes from the brain. But the keyword being theory, to say that the hard problem of consciousness has been solved is a bit oof a leap. There are plenty of scientists that do have theories that consciousness doesn't come from the brain, bio centrism is one example. But what you might have noticed is that in any time period scientific studies usually only get funding to fit the social narrative. For example no government would've funded research into the earth being round when it was believed that it was flat. You explaining materialism when society is in a materialist paradigm. How many people are on mainstream TV talking about the stuff leo or Sadhguru talk about? But yet they have millions and millions of followers, Sadhguru gets paid by Google to do talks for example but you'll never see him on western TV, obviously he doesn't fit in with what we've been taught to believe but that doesn't what he had to see isn't credible. A Nobel prize is a group people that believe someone should be awarded for an idea or work. But it exists in a certain paradigm that will only reward a certain way of thinking. Lao Tzu and the Buddhists have endured thousands of years and their teachings are still relevant today and in fact some are being proved by science and quantum physics

When was it proved that the brain creates consciousness? What were the studies etc?

Exactly, this is the thing, up until now we've been taught that how you know something is by learning it and remembering it. This is how it works in the school system, you know that there were Vikings because we've been told that, but it's limited in that you don't know what it felt like to be a Viking or what there life was really like as you weren't conscious then or at least you don't know if you were. So this is the method that we learn anything, we say we know there was a big bang and that's how the earth started, we know we are human beings, but it's the same method. How you could attempt and possibly truly know something is experientially, in that I know what the colour red is because I experienced that (even that you could contemplate lol), I know I have a thought because I can feel it in my mind etc. It's not that it will give you concrete answers as you might believe you get in science but it will give you truth as much as it's possible for you to perceive it. But I think you're nearly there, you just have to let go of some of your dogmatic, it is that way because it is that way, beliefs. Also keep in mind that society has never stopped in terms of its world view, it's constantly changing, what keeps it in place is dogmatic beliefs. Consider Christianity, they would go to war and kill those with opposing beliefs, sometimes even their own citizen's, just because beliefs have evolved to science and materialism it doesn't mean that that's the end of the road and we've worked everything out, on the contrary we should see that a truly open mind is essential for our evolution as humans and not stick to things we know because we know them. Final point if you actually go in to science quite deeply, you'll see there are a lot of parellels with non dualism and spirituality. Anyway, hope this thread has sparked something in you and you continue to look deeper, enjoy the journey

So essentially this is an orange materialist debate against a community of say green and above non dualists. Here's the thing the non dualists have been through an orange stage, if you look at the nature of the debate @Violinpracticerdude is questioning things as he is not entirely satisfied with his current understanding, something rings true about non dual teaching, so he's trying to either strengthen his current understanding by defeating people on this forum in a debate or, the harder path completely overhaul his beliefs. Problem he can only understand what's being said through the perspective of materialism, which means that essentially he cant understand the non dualists point of view fully. If you notice the non dualists are not really trying to find information from him, as what he knows they already do. They seek maybe partly to reinforce they're beliefs but mainly they see someone who wants to know and is a little lost. Just thought I'd do an overview lol

You will notice ego, everyone has one. He's not enlightened, as he says himself, but he does provide a lot high quality information. If you want to use it, use it, if you dont, don't, it's not complicated. But obviously you wanted a reaction from people ??

Your experience is your experience, and everyone is on their own path, so I don't think it's crazy. But what I was getting at in my first post was if you were born in a different tradition or saved by a different tradition or born 3000 years ago say before christianity, and had a similar mystical experience, would you have the same imagery ie the Bible etc. If you think about it people were having mystical experiences before our current religions, Lao Tzu, Buddhism etc. So not to debate whether you had a mystical experience or not, I'm sure that you did, but really I guess I'm just questioning the particular imagery as I think if you have any imagery it can slow down your spiritual progress. But that's just my opinion

How did you form these beliefs if you don't mind me asking?

Just to say we know that the Bible was written 2000 years ago, or at least that's what is claimed, we also know that humans have been around for 75,000 years or so. In that time there have been various different religions and beliefs and there continue to be more. Consider if you were born 2000 years before the Bible was written, would you have any of these concerns, or would you have the concerns of the culture and religion you were born into? This is not to dismiss the Bible but what you do know is that whatever time you were born you could be silent with yourself and have the same or similar experience to someone else who was silent with themselves. So there's something in you that's constant and transcends all language and ideologies but connects you to everything. You feel strongly about religion but this has not been experinced within you, you have taken these beliefs from what others said or wrote, you would have to contemplate whether this is real truth within the context of everything

Hmm you'll have to talk to future Leo about that

Future Leo discusses how this happened

You missed an opportunity to call it The Eggsperiment

It's a decent channel imo. It may not be advanced, spiritually in the way others are but then not every channel needs to be. He breaks social interactions down in a good way and it kinda reminds me of 'how to win friends' in terms of its usefulness. Worth it on the outward social aspect if that's what you need advice. He also comes across as quite genuine and seems like he's trying to help people

Dont worry about it, i genuinely mean that

Are they really necessary? I'm looking to do some salvia, where I'm getting it from they recommend having a trip sitter but I dont know anyone who's into this type of thing therefore they wouldn't really understand. Also I think it would be a bit weird anyway just having someone there and it might be harder to let go. I have done mushrooms before, it was with other people but even if they weren't there I would've been alright

Yeah that's a bit much for me, would be interesting to hear about how it was for someone who tried it. I may look into 5 meo though, just need to find out where I can get my hands on some in the UK ?

@PsiloPutty @Leo Gura @John Iverson Thanks for the advice, after watching that video I don't think I'm gonna do it, not trying to jump out any windows, I'm on the ground floor but still looks crazy ?? It's funny I was in Amsterdam and I bought some salvia, low dose but still. I was gonna do it but I did weed brownies with a girl I'm seeing. They were strong cos the effects lasted hours, I was enjoying it but she started freaking out. But basically didn't have time to do it, now I'm kinda glad cos she prob would've called the police if I went that crazy. @Leo Gura do you have a trip sitter when you do 5 meo?