Breakingthewall

Yes the depth has not end, but you can realize that what you are is absolute depth, so you don't need to dig In the depth. You realize that infinite depth is infinite everything, and that's it, that is the absolute, what you are. By the way, people who say: enlightenment is realizing that you are God creating the universe... well, there are several things here, on the one hand God, then the action of creating, and the result, the cosmos. All this is not total absolute infinity, it is the manifestation of the fact of the absence of limits, but in total awakening there is no god, no cosmos or creation, there is total undifferentiated infinity, the absolute. You could say that the inevitable consequence of the absolute is God, it is, let's say, posterior, so no absolute. The absolute is immutable, and god is change. these are my realizations, they may be inaccurate, except the realization of absolute infinity which is unequivocal

Sorry I can't remove the quote. Anyway, Those who say: I am enlightened, do they mean that they have had specific experiences of the absolute, or that they are installed there full time? because I have had some total openings, some more or less long, but for example right now I am trapped in my mind. It depends on the moment, if you are meditating, if you take some substance, the mind becomes lighter. but then it comes back. For me enlightenment is only now. Remembering an experience from yesterday is not enlightenment. You were enlightened yesterday, but today you are not

No, this is another conceptual thing. It is quite obvious, the nature of your human mind closes reality, makes it completely opaque, hidden behind a curtain of vibrations of desire, fear, attachment, past, future, concepts and definitions. You can say that this is also enlightenment but it doesn't seem like it, but what's the point of this? If it doesn't seem like it, it isn't to you. One question, have you completely stopped the mental flow and opened yourself completely to the now? can you do it easily? Realizing now what you are is enlightenment. having an opaque mind is not. knowing that only you exist and that is not enlightenment, enlightenment is not knowing, it is dropping the mind and being completely open to what is.

No, enlightenmentIt is opening yourself completely to what you are. It is not understanding, it is being without barriers. It is the absolute total infinity that now and always is, manifesting itself, making itself transparent. But on the other hand, I think there is more. not more absolute than the absolute, but more consciousness as gura says. understanding of what this experience is, clearer, deeper, broader vision of the now. Why don't you admit that both things are compatible? It's obvious I think. One dimension is the quality of what you are, another is the structure, the manifestation. You could say that it's relative, but Just because it has form does not mean it is relative, everything is absolute.

I don't think it's like that. It is human nature, which never settles. For me, the fundamental step for now is opening up to the true nature of reality in a permanent way. This is what is called enlightenment, realizing what you are. Not what you are doing, the structure of reality, etc, but the essence of reality, the absolute. But once I have achieved this in a stable and profound way, I don't think I will it until my death like a Buddha, but will continue exploring. my human nature pushes that

Could be. For now I'm starting to see what reality is, the quality of the now, my realization about how things happen are zero.

I can't see how I'm doing that. But I don't understand how the reality appears as it appears

I understand that the couch It is the appearance that infinity has now, and it could be a cluster of galaxies, in fact, within it is all existence, as in everything that appears. This moment now is infinity, everything is here, but only part of it is visible. In some way you could say that this is imagining, although it is rather limiting. Imagining implies creation, and nothing is created, everything already is

I don't understand the analogy of the dream because it involves someone doing something, and different levels of reality. all the realizations I have had are: reality is total absolute infinity. This experience is because it hides part of the total absolute infinity, just enough to function as a stable pattern of existence. This experience tends to increase in depth, to show more of the total absolute infinity, but it can only do so progressively. existence is eternal cycles in which total absolute infinity is . where is the dream? who dreams? Everything is real, even dreams. reality is absence of limits, this, now. The relative is as real as the absolute because it is the absolute. Everything is the infinite, in its entirety, now you are the infinite in its entirety, trying to show everything possible about yourself while maintaining a stable pattern of existence. using your infinite intelligence to make this. Nothing is unreal or imaginary, everything is the only reality, the shape that the absolute has now, and now is everything

It means that there is a subject doing something with a result. I'm not sure if it is a good description.

If imagination is absolute, why you call it "imagination"

Its difficult to say , but I'd say that you as a human are a pattern of existence, a form in reality, or consciousness or whatever you want to name it. Each pattern of reality represents a blockage of the level of consciousness, a limitation, since if it were not so it could not be organized in a certain pattern. The human pattern has a range of opening possibilities. from closed degrees, I don't know, Attila the Hun, to more open degrees, Ramana Maharshi, etc. So, if you can increase your consciousness by reconfiguring the pattern that you are to open yourself more to reality

In you reflection you could try to understand why knowing what others are and what you are is important. who wants to know? What does it mean to know something? What is the difference if the others are real or not? Who is this important to? The answer is simple: it is important for the conceptual framework created that you cannot get rid of. let it go, and that's it, reality remains. the moment you think: yes, ok, that's very nice, but then, the others are...that's it, you're back inside. in the conceptual mind. If you want to see what others are, it's easy, meet a person and talk to them, that's what others are, reality flowing. you can only be. think about it, and you're out

I believe that the change of consciousness begins by forgetting the idea of God and any other idea. The screen must be clean so that what appears is not immediately corrupted. As you yourself have said many times, you are a person who exposes his realizations, not a guru. Think about the entire process (a whole life), and the personality configuration (genetics, whatever) that has led you to reach the opening you have reached. What would be the way for other people who are at a different point to take a shortcut and reach the same thing? very difficult to know, but I would say that the first thing is: make your mind an empty screen. Drop all ideas. From this, we will see

Yeah sure, I'm not saying no, I'm saying that the way it is presented leads people to take it as a belief, rather than realizing it themselves. How many people do you think really dare to leave all the structures behind and see? Not a lot right? So, if you tell them that of look at your hand, it will only help them form a mental construction mixing all the content they have absorbed, and think: yes, I am God and I am alone. until they realize that it doesn't work that way and have a little crisis

Here everybody talk about god without having realized god. I think the position of @zurew is several orders of magnitude more advanced than being a believer. What requires courage is to let your mental schemes fall and be without grips or filters. But it's useless to say it, here people prefer their little golden cage, the same as everywhere else.

Exactly, and agree with everything that you said in your post. So the only way not to be completely stupid is to have no idea about reality. It's completely obvious. If there are no limits, and the ideas are limited, they are automatically all false. the true tao cannot be said, they know that from long ago...the obvious beginning of spirituality. But no, here in actualized we are much more smart that those old Stupids , right,?

You can't understand solipsism whatching a video. Solipsism is only real at an absolute level, and to realize it at an absolute level you must stop your relative mind. to think: the people I see walking down the street have no experience of their own (as it is said in the video) it is a relative thought, therefore it is mixing the absolute with the relative, which is dogma, religion, in short, stupidity

changing your current conceptual structure for another, the solipsism, is completely absurd. This work consists of freeing yourself from conceptual structures and seeing directly. It's very easy to understand. Any concept is toxic on a spiritual level. Its usefulness is at the survival level. and solipsism at the survival level has the same usefulness as psychosis

Seems obvious that the substance of the relative is the absolute, so at the end the relative is the absolute, but how it appears? Seems that everything is cyclical movement. The explanation: god is creating really by love, doesn't seems correct to me. Maybe would be like: the nature of reality are eternal cycles of creation and destruction of shapes in the absolute.

At the end, that's true, Let's say that when the needle is more towards the absolute side, suffering decreases and increases towards the relative. absolute total, zero suffering. Being able to place oneself at will in the total absolute is the art that you mention and to say that that is not enlightenment is ignorance. but then...what is relative seems to be. Should you ignore it? exists. what is it? What is its nature? by what is?

You're welcome. I would say that really, nothing is relative, everything is absolute. a dog is absolute. If a dog chases a cat, there is that absolute situation. Neither the dog nor the cat divides the situation into parts, it is a whole happening, or maybe they do, because they have a basic relative mind, but in a very rudimentary level. A human sees it and it really is the absolute appearing as that situation, but the relative mind is going to parcel out and define the entire situation, a state-of-the-art evolutionary function that gives the human enormous power, but creates relativity and gets lost in it. , with which your experience loses vitality, purity, and experience becomes something filtered, dull, dead. More relative mind, more dead. When you were a kid and the relative mind was smaller, the experience was alive ,pure, direct. As you are getting older and the relative mind grows in power, the experience is more filtered. The total life and purity is zero relative mind: the total absolute infinity. if you think about it now, you will think: what nonsense, there is really a cat and a dog chasing each other. That has been defined by the relative mind, which has classified cat, dog and chase. and it can't get out of there, it will start searching his memory files, creating images, thinking about theories, etc. really that situation is absolute and infinite. It is now in its constant movement that it really is not movement because it is not going anywhere. If you take away the relative mind completely, the chase of the dog and the cat is the immutable absolute total infinity. So the relative mind is creating the experience. Without relative mind , there is not experience, just immutability. Total life now. How the absolute divides itself and creates the relative? Why? I don't know. But the thing is: the relative is not real, it's just a painting in the absolute infinity.

I think it can't because the relative mind is a learned function that works by putting things in opposition to other things. Any concept is limited by its opposite. The absolute is unlimited, so the relative mind cannot grasp it, define it. The relative mind collapses when imagining infinity, because it needs to set a limit to be able to imagine it. You have to turn off the relative mind to realize the infinite, the depth that you are. with the relative mind operating, you see yourself as relative.

Stupidity is the attitude of using the relative mind to try to understand the absolute. The relative mind is a configuration of the total mind to function by opposing concepts. It is an incredible survival tool, an evolutionary leap. It's what we're using right now to talk, and our relative minds feed off each other. they grow in complexity and depth. but the relative mind must know what it is, what its limitation is and move away. Stopping does not mean dissapearing because this is impossible, there is only one mind: existence. to deviate is to change frequency, from relative to absolute functioning. The absolute does not define, it does not contrast, it does not draw plot lines, it does not function in a linear way but in a profound way. It is the total mind, which gains in depth the more you open yourself to it, so to yourself You can say that what I have said is a story, interpretation. but it is interpretation of the relative mind by the relative mind. the absolute mind does not speak.

I guess that the first is about the nature of the reality, and the second about the structure of the reality. Why reject one of them when both can be realized?