Breakingthewall

I understand that the human ego is built from the interaction with the others, so without the others, the ego dissapears Its you interpretation, but that's not what the video says. If it were what you say, it would not have been anything controversial or new, it would have been what traditional spirituality says. the solipsism of actualized is not that. It's that the people you talk to have been created by you to wake up, or for whatever, but they don't really exist. That is, they are empty images without their own experience. If the video said: as far as you are concerned only you have experience. People would say: ak, ok. Yawn. You say that it's a Leo's strategy to move our mind. If it's so, ok, good job . Interesting and useful spiritual exercise

Ah, if you say, sure it is. Could you share how did you arrive to this conclusion? Regardless of that, awakening has no relation on knowing whether others exist or not.

I watched the video on solipsism and what was said was that I am creating the others who appear in my experience and that they do not have consciousness, only I do. I am creating Leo to awaken, but Leo has no consciousness of his own, he is an image without real existence. If you ask Leo how he knows this, he will tell you that it cannot be proven that others exist and that you have to wake up to understand it.

The reality is infinity, solipsism is a limited mental construction.

Exactly. You can watch the video, it explains it without a doubt. is: only I have real consciousness, others are mental constructions without experience. There is only one experience, mine. then you ask: but then, in the eternity of existence, only this avatar has existed, now? No, there have been infinite avatars, and there will be. but now there is only this one, in the future you will be the others. Then you ask: but if time is not real, when in the future or in the past? They don't exist now? then they answer: to understand it you must awake (eventually it is possible that they will add a humiliating insult, as a tribute to their leader)

Solipsism says: only I exist because I will never be able to leave my experience, if my experience becomes the entire cosmos I will continue to be me, therefore, only I exist, the others do not exist, they are hallucinations within my experience without self-consciousness . This is a construction based on logic. The first is to understand that the self as we are perceiving it is a sensation created by the dual experience in which there is an unappealable difference between me and what is not me. If they hit me with a hammer it hurts, if they hit you, it doesn't hurt. Therefore the self is the center of the experience that thinks and survives and for this it relates to others. Solipsism says that it is all a hallucination created by the self on another higher plane that hides itself to live an adventure. That self is the same dual self only expanded to infinity, and therefore, one. there can be no other. What I see as wrong here are two things. The first and most fundamental is that the perceiving self, which is the center, is a temporary construction. the moment there is no more center, there is no more self. It is difficult to maintain this state, extremely fragile because the center pushes to return. It's ego death. In ego death one perceives that reality is an unfathomable well of living existence, this existence is what we are and is impersonal, it is not someone, it is pure intelligence and life that arise from the lack of limits, one could call this god, but it is completely indefinite and impersonal. This reality is infinite. What infinity means is that the whole and the part are the same, infinite. Inside and outside are the same. When the infinite is limited to one experience, it automatically is all experiences. this is the cosmos. The entire cosmos is contained in this moment now, it is cyclical and it is infinite. Within each cycle are all the cycles, and within each one of them, again all of them. it does not have an end. Others are within you and you are within them, but you, the self, is the limitation of the infinity to this concrete experience. Its is not a playful god who goes on adventures, it is the living infinity in its infinite cycles balancing each other perfectly, like infinite snow crystals that fit together perfectly. The word consciousness implies being aware of something, infinity is not consciousness, it is existence that creates consciousness by exploding into all the infinite fragments of existence it contains. Everything, absolutely, is alive, and everything is infinite. To think that the thinking self is the totality is wrong. It contains the totality, but is limited for the experience to exist. In fact, it's a limit, so temporary. When the experience ceases, he will cease.

You are god in the sense that what you really are is the infinite reality that exists and manifests, but you are not in the sense that the self that is perceived as the center of experience and that questions whether others exist, It is a transitory creation that dissolves into nothingness. It's very easy to get confused. very difficult to understand the subtle difference, how the experience is created. You have to dissolve yourself totally many times to start to have a glimpse

you are not the creator of the experience but a product of the experience. The self that perceives itself as the center is transitory, reality is something very different, but it is something unimaginable for someone who has not broken the appearance. heavy egos that are interested in spirituality tend toward solipsism, which is a mirror understanding. They understand it exactly backwards. Only those who are willing to give themselves generously can open to reality. in short, who are willing to die. It is not usual, the normal thing is to want to inflate yourself to the maximum, and believe yourself to be god. The bottomless reality is what you really are, but it's not you.

You can't hurt me in the slightest because I see you as a child struggling to maintain his self-esteem. I feel sympathy towards you, but that doesn't mean I won't say what I think. The thing is not the intentions you have, but how full of shit you are. By shit I mean a fragile ego that needs to be fed. It is easy to see it, it is perceived in the inconsistencies, small lies, self-aggrandizement, etc. People who suffer from this will always be treacherous, false, and not recommended in relationships. in short, fake.

Anyone who doesn't see that Razard is an inflated guy full of himself is completely blind. Don't you see how he attacks those who question him the least and how he is super nice to those who flatter him, like you? He is a normal narcissist, the typical damaged guy who inflates himself as a defense. In his case he uses the enlightened mode, but if you analyze what he says, he twists things to be right. zero nobility, very little truth. fake. but there are many fools who will be dazzled. That's what narcissists do, look for fools.

awakening is realizing the substance of reality, to put it another way. this substance is indefinable and unthinkable. The word truth implies knowing something, knowing that it is true as opposed to what is a lie. awakening is not on that plane, it does not mean that. It is a total opening to reality, which is partially closed so that a defined experience can occur. Truth is an idea of the mind, and the mind is something that is within reality. You can shout whatever you want and take all the mental turns you want, you will still be trapped in the mind.

Its a definition that means nothing unless you already saw through the veil of experience. Just words to describe something that can't be described or thought Truth implies that there is a lie. It means that you thought that reality was a certain way, and you realized that it is not like that, therefore what you thought was a lie, and now you know what the truth is. This cannot be applied to the absolute, because it is no more true, it is without limits. The relative is also true, with limits. If everything is true, it is redundant to say that it is. When we talk about the truth, it means that you have realized that only you exist, that you are God, that you are creating reality. This cannot be applied to the absolute either, the absolute is the absence of limits and all of the above are limits. one is limit. any definition is. The ego doesn't like that, right? wants definition. That's why he likes so much: I'm God, I'm alone imagining reality. well that is a completely relative phrase, sorry for the ego

Morality is essential if you want to open yourself to the absolute, but it is an exclusively particular morality. You always know exactly what moral behavior is, what to do. This can be killing or stealing at a given moment, it can also be giving your life for someone, or picking up a piece of paper from the ground. It is obvious what you should do, reality tells you. If you do not behave in a perfectly aligned way, opening will be impossible.

I think the word truth is very incorrect to define reality. It involves things like: I know the truth, for example, that only I exist, as opposed to the lie, which is that others also exist. Both are relative and meaningless statements in terms of realizing the absolute. The absolute is not the truth, it is seeing through the veil of experience, through the veil of the self. what you see is the totality of existence, the great infinite abyss alive. This is neither truth nor lie, the same as the self. They are two different ways to open yourself to the now, one limited, the other unlimited.

Who knows what the human limit is. Immortality seems certain if civilization continues to advance for a few more centuries. genetic manipulation, electronic implants, quantum intelligence... a human from the 30th century could be something very strange. And who knows what discoveries await in the cosmos. interdimensional travel, manipulation of the fabric of reality...it is impossible to foresee it. The reality is that life passes from bacteria to humans, its evolutionary push is unstoppable, and its force is pushing right now

Reality is intelligence evolving, if a point is reached where human evolution cannot advance any further, I suppose there will be a transcendence and another evolution, it does not seem that the game is going to stop. Who knows what is the scope of the cosmos

But the guy say a lot of crazy things, can't be serious Haha but it would be a boring documentary, leo doing 5meo , people chatting, on the other hand, shadguru's... I'm sure there are very strange things there, that guy moves millions, and he has something false about him, the things he says about aliens, that old people reach nirvana but if you die in an accident you go to hell. man....what is this?

I believe that others have a pov, but that is not the issue for me, others exist in my experience and that's it, what I try is the openness to the infinite because there is a natural barrier in us that prevents this, that limits us , and for me the work is to eliminate that barrier. Every time an opening occurs, you understand a little better what this barrier is, the next time it's a little easier. The living infinity is home, it is what we are. It's exactly what you're looking for. It has no bearing on whether the others have pov or not, this is just an idea.

Maybe games in another dimension, infinity is more than we can imagine.

Yes it's imaginary at relative level, Because there is a more real self that is producing it, then there seems to be a first-order reality and another second-order reality that is imagined by the first-order reality, but those are only relative mental constructions. They don't mean anything at an absolute level. If you start making those differentiations you place yourself on a relative level. If you want the absolute to open up, you must mix everything, erase any structure. That does not mean that the structures are false, but that they are structures. Are the others real? That question is a structure, and from the structured mind you can answer it, but at an absolute level it means nothing. In my opinion, thinking that the relative mind can define what reality is like and how it works, may be possible, but no one here is even close to understanding how infinity manifests itself, and it is very dumb to try to understand it before you have even really opened it. First to be able to be absolute without any problem, that's not a chimera, is possible and it's the real freedom, the authentic change , more that you could dream. Then, try to understand in a relative level, if it's possible to understand the infinity. Maybe it is.

Maybe, but if we are interested in spirituality we should know how to differentiate between the relative and the absolute. If you want to realize the absolute, you must totally let go of the relative. For that you have to realize that anything you think is relative, because it is putting one thing in relation to another, so any thought has the same meaning at an absolute level: none. Once this is clear, you can do it. That's why I said to inligthened: take the high-dose psychedelics test, any confusion means attachment. The only possibility you have left is to let go of all the structures or you will enter hell. It's a very instructive way to see what the relative is, and how to let it go

Realize now everything that you are, the sensations, ideas, everything that your senses show you. everything that is right now. then melt it all together, until all that remains is a uniform soup . In this soup there is no center, no edges, there is really nothing, but it is everything. This is all existence. It will blow up in your face, that is. the abysmal unfathomable total existence, what you are.

real or imaginary is a distinction of the ego, and is completely meaningless. It's obvious right?

This war is a very serious matter. The US, with its game of fuck the Russians by arming Ukraine and pushing it towards destruction, has awakened the bear. Now Russia is the military power of the world. No one can mobilize an army like that willing to fight to the death. This represents a big change. Once you know that you are the strongest in the yard, obviously you start to set conditions.

I find the shadguru phenomenon fascinating. Is that guy crazy? is it all a joke? Why does he say the strange things he does? Does he have a scriptwriter? In 10 years there will be a series about him and his entire media empire