Breakingthewall

Being a millionaire doesn't bring any real happiness; rather, it subtracts from it because it disconnects you from reality. It's another thing entirely if they appear happy. People put a lot of effort (unconsciously) into projecting images onto others to see themselves reflected in them and feel like they are that image. This is called narcissism, and if you're a millionaire, your narcissism bar skyrockets. A woman from a Filipino village with five children who cooks for the whole neighborhood is much happier because she's connected, she's vibrating at the frequency of what's real. For those of us born outside that frequency, there is only the path of openness. No other path, under any circumstances, works. We have to open ourselves to the whole, to the source. To truly do it. If not only misery and nihilism awaits ahead.

The human being is a phase shift in reality. A leap as absolute as the leap from the structures of reality governed by the laws of the cosmos like a star to the emergence of life, which is sustained by those laws but creates its own. When the structural complexity of life reaches a critical level, reality needs to equalize. Just as a change in an electron gives rise to a photon to maintain the symmetry of the universe, the critical level of complexity in living structures gives rise to an absolute phase shift: the mind. The human being is a biological hive being that supports a new structure of reality that transcends matter: the mind. being human is not a game; it is a crucible of purification, a process of opening. A transition from the animal, closed by its genetics, to the unlimited living mind, a new way of existing of the reality.

Yes and any living being but in another sense than humans.

Sardines, birds, or cats aren't frustrated and all that, so I guess in all eternity there will be many other non-frustrating possibilities. If you are a human being with a certain energetic configuratin, you must make the movement of opening yourself to the absolute, because otherwise your life is madness and misery. Enlightenment is not about knowing things; it's about being open to your ultimate nature. This openness implies understanding that death is just change, because being open to your total nature implies understanding that what you truly are is that total nature, and the human energetic configuration is a transient structure.

It's not a debate to prove who is right, but an excuse to try to express a perspective as clearly as possible and from different angles, without falling into contradictions that the other person would point out. Perhaps I'm mistaken, but for me, idealism means that I'm imagining reality, that it doesn't have its own existence; it's a flat hologram whose sole function is for me to see it. (Very dualistic deep down) The opposite is materialism, which says that reality is real in itself, and that I am a part of reality, configured as a living being with a mind, observing another part of reality, which is a tree. We are both reality in different configurations, and we are separate yet interconnected, and ultimately made of mathematical relationship, given that modern physics admits that all of reality is interconnected through quantum entanglement, relationships between fields; nothing is isolated, and the fundamental reality is interaction between fields that are really nothing without it's manifestation in coherent relationships, just potentiality . Then materialism is not "materialistic" ultimately, but it's dualistic in surface, non dualistic in depth. Really modern physic is non dualistic because the foundation of reality at quantum level is the void, that's a field of infinite possibilities.

Because "reality in mental" implies a difference between mind and matter, and also intention. A mind implies an absolute being that imagines, that is, that makes decisions, does things for certain reasons; it is, in a way, an individual. Reality is limitless, therefore it doesn't make decisions, it unfolds. It doesn't desire, it is inevitable. It doesn't decide, it is coherence. It is not one, it is limitless. "One" implies "two," limitless is neither one nor two. One implies not another, limitless implies that one and the other have no absolute meaning, only relative meaning. One represent a circle, limitless represent an unfathomable abyss. All this may seem silly or unnecessary, but it is essential, because if your mind becomes attached to the idea of "one," or "mind," it becomes trapped, closed off

I've explained this many times very simply from different angles, and I'll do it again: the ultimate nature of reality is the absence of limits, absolute openness. Reality gives rise to the existence, which is manifestation, which is change or contrast. What changes is not something, not a substance like consciousness, but rather the very fact of change creates substance. A reflection creates its opposite and is in turn created by its opposite. This is difficult to represent mentally because for the mind there must be a basis, but ultimately the only basis there is is openness, and the primordial contrast is inevitable, coherent mathematical fluctuation because there are no limits. Changes of state of the void , because it's not void due the absence of limitations, it's full of potential. Or, if you prefer, in simplified language, reality is mental, but saying it that way is extremely misleading because there is not a mind, it's just openess, absence of limitations

What you call matter or physicality is a type of ripple in the fields of reality that interacts with the Higgs field, creating density. Density means space and time. Matter isn't "matter," it's a ripple in reality, like light but with a different kind of interaction. What you call consciousness is this same ripple in the fabric of reality acquiring a dual structure within spacetime. It's all the same: fluctuations that create reflections, which in turn create other fluctuations that group together into coherent structures. The basis of everything is the openess, that's not happening. "Happening" means a determinate kind of structure, but fundamentally is the same than not happening, but as we are happening in a determinate geometry we can't imagine another, it's absolutely impossible. We can open ourselves to the absolute, but always from the relative that is happening now.

what means that?

In the absence of limits, there are no limits between realities. Infinity has never begun; therefore, any micro-vibration expands its effect throughout the totality, creates the whole, and is simultaneously created by the total. Everything is interconnected, but being infinite, it is unimaginable.

Reality has no substance; here's the point. Reality is the absence of limits, and the absence of limits makes infinite coherence inevitable. Coherence in the sense of stable, synchronous fluctuations linked infinitely. It is inevitable. It is not a substance that fluctuates; fluctuation creates substance. And you cannot say that fluctuation or change of state is the substance, since change is the consequence of limitlessness. The essence of reality is limitlessness; it is the absence of something, limits, but if you open yourself to it, you will see that it is everything, it is total fullness. Sat chit ananda. Sat, that which is; chit, absolutely coherent, knows itself without needing to be conscious because of its total coherence. Ananda: open, absolute, total. That is reality.

This is being different, feel rejection, hate. Human condition is very hard, we need love. https://www.instagram.com/reel/DKwbZiYo79D/?igsh=MXBic2xxNnp5MmZrZw== But real love only appears when the essence brights without hindrance.

Consciousness emerges from a self-organizing system (life) that maintains internal coherence (self-preservation) and, by generating a functional boundary with respect to the rest of reality, creates duality and acquires the capacity to reflect and model the environment. This capacity for modeling is what we call "witnessing" or "experience." This model is also reality, in a dual dimension, which we call consciousness. It's very obvious, there are infinite possible dimensions in reality, consciousness is just one. Reality is not made of consciousness, consciousness is made of reality. Consciousness is not something different than reality, is just a way in which reality organizes itself, but reality doesn't need that way of organization to be the reality

It is simply limited. It limits reality to one property of reality, and it does so because, from the conscious human perspective, consciousness is the fundamental quality, and nothing more fundamental can be conceived. Just as a two-dimensional circle could not conceive of a three-dimensional circle. It is a primitive conception that limits reality to one dimension, that of consciousness, because I am conscious. To be conscious means to be aware of. Of what? Of a becoming, a process. Without a process, there is no consciousness, so it is said: consciousness imagines the process in order to be aware of it. So, is consciousness also an actor that creates things? Based on what? On other things. What are those other things? More consciousness. Does this make any sense to someone with even a modicum of intelligence? I don't think so. Consciousness happens, it's just a possibility. Being human is difficult imagining anything without a creator, then, as primitive religious idolaters we deify conscience because it is obvious for us.

Non-duality states that reality is consciousness, that its foundation is consciousness, and that phenomena appear within it. I believe that's impossible; reality is conscious, not consciousness. From a conscious perspective of reality, we can open ourselves to its essential nature, have the experience of being aware of the fundamental nature of reality . But reality is not a consciousness that dreams, but rather the total absence of limits in which the possible manifests, and consciousness is an inevitable manifestation of this.

Non-duality is a conceptual framework. It states that there are no two, everything is one, and that everything is consciousness. These are definitions that occur on the mental plane, even though they think of it as no-mind or emptiness. What I'm talking about is the energetic opening to the source of all that exists, to the unlimited. It's not a realization, it's an action.

Logic means relationship. Any relationship is logical. Any relationship is mathematical. Logic means coherence. Only what's coherent exist. Just because what is not coherent can't exist, because anything needs it's reflection, it's opposite polarity to be. That's because nothing exist inherently, "exist" means relationship, reflection.

For me was extremely useful but now not so. are useful to break your energetic blockages . Maybe in the future are good again in different sense, to explore, let's see

Manifest reality, existence itself, consists of relationships between states. That's a fact, pure logic; it can't be anything else. Logic and science both state this. If you break something down to its fundamentals, in the end, all that remains is a stable, coherent possibility relating to one another, a mathematical equation. It's pure logic. Let's see: in the absence of limits, a fluctuation will occur, since there are infinite possibilities; otherwise, it would be a closed system, and this is impossible by definition. The question is: what fluctuates? What fluctuates is one field of possibilities relative to another, mutually creating each other through reflection. Any oscillation implies polarity, and any coherent and stable change of polarity is a vibration. It's not that something vibrates, but rather that the fact of the synchronous change of polarity creates the something. Reality is a field of possibilities, and it is so only because it has no limits. Reality is simply the absence of limits, and this gives rise to everything, infinite being, infinite life, which in reality is nothing, just possible mathematical equations, but that multiplied by infinity is the living totality.

I used to do 5 meo, mushrooms, DMT, in high doses but now they are like just physically violent and flat, what works now for me is 5ug of LSD and a single puff of weed. Much more than a huge dose of DMT . I think i did so much DMTs that now they are like being in flat state, without anything, like fractals and empty mind, but empty flat, without depth. Lsd and mushrooms in high dose, like flow, it's like movement that flows without any meaning but also flat. Pleasant, but stressful for the body but more flat than normal state. Psychedelics abandoned me. But 1 puff of weed is like relaxation of the barriers , depth.

Well maybe I exaggerated a bit😅 but maybe some record could be. What I mean is that psychedelics can promote the dissolution of the human energetic barriers that keep us isolated in a bubble, but it's unwise to believe the structural visions that appear during a trip. Everything is symbolic and relative to the experience of the person in that state. For me, any understanding is meaningless; it's just noise. "I am God creating reality" is just noise, even if it's a vision beyond the conceptual; it means nothing, What I seek is the opening of my energy barriers to give way to the totality. The totality is inarticulate; it is total, absolute openess, the true nature of reality. Can't be said, because it's absolute, without contrast, unthinkable. Anything that you can think is an structure in the human mind, that's built in a limited dimensional way. For Example, if I say: only me exist. Or : others exist and are another perspective of the absolute. Both are mental constructions that are built in the human frame. Imagine another frame in another dimension in another reality or universe. You can't imagine, in any case. You can't imagine the infinity, it's not linear or defined, it's unthinkable. You can be open to it, not understand it, because it has not limits. It's impossible to understand what has not limits. Understanding is limited. Then do psychedelics and open your heart, there is the substance of everything, the unlimited.

Knowing is an energetic structure that's happening in this dimension of existence, the human structure, that creates a line between cause and effect, subject and object. Then the ego is created, knowing things. The ego's capacity for knowledge is limited, not infinite; it's linear, operating within a specific dimension, not infinite dimensions. Therefore, anything the ego knows is limited, not absolute. So, is enlightenment limited knowledge, and therefore not entirely true?

The sense of self It's a relational structure created by millions of years of evolution that exists in humans. Not having a sense of self is unrelated to enlightenment; the self is not illusory, it's as real as the body. It's for example the energetic vibration we call "fear" that appears when you go down to take out the trash and find a hungry tiger More than comprehension, it's openess. The energetic structure of the self is closed by default, so that the individual and society can function. The forces that push you toward closure are irresistible. Enlightenment is the opening of those energetic barriers that veil the true nature of what you are and everything is. The unlimited field of possibilities that flows in coherent, limitless relationships. The abyss that lives because nothing limits it. Understanding can happen, but who understand is the human structure, the self. Enlightenment is not understanding, is being without limits.

Then enlightenment is knowing something. I don't think so

If it's just just the tao, you are the tao. And there is a human self that recognizes itself as the tao because the human self is an energetic structure that happens in the reality as real as the body, that recognizes things. The only difference with the body is that you can touch the body but the self is made by neural pathways as real as a stone