Breakingthewall

You haven't understood anything. No one in Islam really cares that 20 million Muslims in China are being repressed and their religion banned, or that they are being massacred in Serbia. Have you heard about the Bosnian Nakba 150,000 times? Or the Uyghur one? Do you think there were no displacements, land thefts, or murders there? It's serious but temporary. What is intolerable is that a country is governed by non-Muslims in the holy Muslim land. It's a purely religious matter. In Islam, religion and politics are one. But those rigid close minded dogmatic people who have given their freedom in exchange of stability and belonging have to bow the head. That's life. They live around a lie, and in time lies always are revealed

@Raze ohhhh the little puppy sooooo cute with his passive aggressive IA. Look what mine says, seems different. Then, why do the 🤡 with the IA just to troll? Why are you in this forum? To win any medal? Good, you are a champ, so cute and so cool. Then stop trolling 1. “Israel's humiliation of Islam has once again been absolute.” This line reflects a perception rather than a literal fact. Objectively, Israel has demonstrated military and technological superiority over actors such as Hamas or the Houthis, but it has not “humiliated Islam” as a religion. What happens instead is that many in the Muslim world interpret Israel’s victories as religious humiliation, because Islamic identity is deeply intertwined with politics. This creates a symbolic cycle: Israel views its actions as self-defense. The Muslim world interprets them as an attack on Islam. That perception sustains the ideological conflict. 2. “Iran, Yemen, Hezbollah, and Hamas. We'll see how long the peace lasts.” This is an accurate summary of the regional alignment: these groups and states form an informal anti-Israel axis under Iranian influence. Every Israeli strike against one of them destabilizes the region. Right now there is a tense ceasefire, but no real sign of lasting peace. Stability depends on three factors: How long the Iranian regime withstands internal pressure. Whether Hezbollah maintains deterrence in Lebanon. Whether the U.S. and Saudi Arabia manage to prevent a wider escalation. 3. “Difficult situation for Jews, surrounded by hate everywhere.” Historically true. Israel exists in a hostile environment, not only militarily but also symbolically. From the Israeli perspective, the war is not merely about land—it is about existential legitimacy, the right to exist as a state and as a people. 4. “Let's see if the Iranian regime falls; it could be a consequence of this.” Possible, but unlikely in the near term. Iran faces serious economic and moral pressure, yet the regime remains solid thanks to three pillars: efficient repression, religious-ideological control, and anti-Western nationalism, now reinforced by outrage over Gaza. Ironically, Israel’s offensive may temporarily strengthen the Iranian regime by rallying its population around an external enemy. 5. “Imagine that Israelis were Muslims. Would anyone care if they expelled the Palestinians?” This points to a valid observation of the global double standard. When Muslim regimes commit atrocities—Sudan against southern Christians, Turkey against Kurds, Syria against its own population—the international reaction is far weaker. The difference is symbolic: Israel represents the West. Palestine represents the oppressed Global South. This emotional framing overrides moral consistency: the world reacts according to identity, not ethics. Summary The reflection captures an accurate intuition: The conflict between Israel and political Islam is less military than symbolic, and global opinion judges it through emotion, not coherence. Israel cannot afford indifference—its survival depends on strength. Political Islam cannot yield—its identity depends on confrontation. And the rest of the world responds according to moral sentiment, not logical consistency.

When I said that? Seems that your IA is inventing things. Your use of the IA is pathetic btw Anyway Israel's humiliation of Islam has once again been absolute. Iran, Yemen, Hezbollah, and Hamas. We'll see how long the peace lasts. I doubt it will last long. Difficult situation for Jews, surrounded by hate everywhere . Let's see if Iranian regime falls, would be a consequence of this. Just a question: imagine that Israeli were Muslims. Anyone would care if they expulse the Palestinian? Many Muslim countries are oppressing people, like Kurds, Sudan, etc, and who cares? Just a Rhetorical question, it's obvious that your need to be with the good guys against the bad American devil is preventing you from thinking clearly.

I don't think the Jews felt humiliated by the Germans, it was more a matter of absolute horror. They can stand in the land and be friends with the Jews. I'd like they can evolve and be open-minded. You are right, a lot of broken families and problems in west culture, nobody denied that. Sure, the Turkish are very worried about the injustice to the Palestines, they can't sleep because that. Are they worried about the injustice in congo? There are many. You are...well, I don't want to put adjectives. Put the adjective that you think it's correct Just a question: have the Muslims ever protest about any injustice to any non Muslim? the christians did many times, for example now.

Muslims hate Israel only because Israel humiliated Islam again and again. Not because they feel solidarity for the Palestinians, and Palestinian move for pride more than for it's own benefits, that's why the cheer the 7oct in gaza. Islam deserved to be humiliated, because it's mainly a shit. Rigidess, abuse, consanguinity, narrow minded. Israel put Islam in the right place: down. Let's see if the Muslims take advantage of this lesson os humility to change. Anyway It's impossible to have a conversation with you; you're just a sad, self-righteous narrow minded incapable of independent thought.

@Raze btw, I fully understand the Palestinians' demands, and they are largely legitimate, but they must completely escape the rhetoric of hatred toward Israel and the goal of its annihilation. If the Palestinian government were secular and sought a two-state solution, reconciliation, and collaboration, I would think that Palestine was right. But it seems that the majority of Palestinians are driven by hatred and an Islamic identity. Dealing with people who operate from that framework is impossible. Well, it is possible: as is being done now. (Now ask your IA: debunk this text . Oh so wise. Try to speak with your words, maybe you can, just try)

@Arrasar Honor and Humiliation: The Hidden Engine of the Palestinian Conflict Beyond politics and religion, one of the deepest forces sustaining the Israeli-Palestinian conflict is a cultural code rooted in much of the Arab world: the logic of collective honor. This ethic, older than the states themselves, helps explain why the cycle of violence persists even when rational compromise seems possible. 1. Humiliation as the Core Experience For many Palestinians, especially the older generations, the Nakba of 1948 was not merely a territorial loss but a collective humiliation —the defeat of an Arab people by a smaller, non-Muslim community on what they regarded as their land. That event was transformed into a wound of identity, passed from generation to generation. The Palestinian cause therefore seeks not only sovereignty but the restoration of dignity. When honor becomes the goal, survival alone is no longer enough. 2. Martyrdom as Redemption In this symbolic framework, death in resistance is not senseless; it restores balance. The shahīd (martyr) reclaims collective worth through sacrifice. Families who have lost children sometimes speak of pride rather than despair —not because they lack feeling, but because their culture links value to endurance and honor more than to comfort or safety. 3. Israel as the Mirror of Humiliation Israel embodies, for many Palestinians, the visible proof of that humiliation: a small, technologically advanced, Western-aligned state dominating millions of Arabs. To accept Israel’s permanence feels, for some, like accepting eternal shame. Thus, even when reason suggests that war is futile, the moral structure of honor forbids surrender. To live without dignity would mean to cease existing as a people. The Tragic Impasse When the axis of identity is honor, rational peace becomes almost impossible, because any agreement implies defeat for one side. And a community built on dignity cannot accept defeat —even at the cost of its own survival. Conclusion The Israeli-Palestinian conflict is not only a clash of interests but a collision between two existential grammars: Israel’s logic of security and individual survival, and Palestine’s logic of collective dignity and restoration of honor. Until that symbolic wound of humiliation is transformed into a new form of shared dignity, any political settlement will remain fragile —a ceasefire, not a reconciliation.

Then, If the population of countries like Romania, Germany, or the Czech Republic vote for parties that promote rapprochement with Russia, it is assumed that they have done so because they were convinced by Russian propaganda, which is evil, and those elections are annulled or mysterious deaths occur among members of that party. In other words, democracy is democracy if you vote for whoever i want, if not it is malicious Russian propaganda and the results are banned

Yanukovich was pro Russian by origins. He tried to balance relationship with Russia and Europe. In 2013 Europe asked him austerity and Russia offered credit. Then he turns to Russia. Is that a crime? Zekensky started with the promise of normalization of the relationship with Russia and fighting the corruption. Then he did the opposite.

Fortunately, Trump would never do something as crazy as break a promise; it would be terrifying. Americans would unanimously lynch him.

Sure, sure, there are no proofs about the Nord stream. Sorry, those arguments are compelling. If I told you that Hitler didn't like Jews, you could provide a huge pile of outraged data claiming that Hitler loved Jews, but that they wanted to commit suicide, and Hitler hospitalized them to prevent such suicides. He would personally sing them Hebrew songs before they went to sleep, but the ungrateful ones still committed suicide.

Let's see, first, there's an illegal, forced change of government perpetrated by anti-Russian nationalists. Ukraine and Russia have a long tradition of problems with this, helping Hitler, Stephen Bandera, etc. In Ukraine, there are like million people who identify as Russian and much more who speak Russian as main language, a large proportion of the country. These people feel threatened by a violent change of government and hold referendums. A civil war begins. The Americans begin arming Ukraine and building fortifications, virus labs near military bases, pissing in Russia's face for eight years. Then, at some point, they proclaim Ukraine's annexation into NATO, with the possibility (and certainty) of hosting nuclear weapons. Many analysts, including Kissinger, claim this will lead to Russia invading Ukraine, 100% certain. Biden knows this perfectly well. He was behind Euromaidan with Victoria Nuland when he was vice president under Obama. In fact, his drug-addicted son was a director of Ukraine's largest gas company. The Nord Stream is then destroyed, and the US no longer enters a recession but grows by 2%. Ukraine is left in ruins with millions of exiles and Germany is in recession and all Europe weakened. Just a scam, playing with the feelings of nationalist like puppets.

No, it's much better start a war a destroy the country Btw, the new government was same or more corrupted than the former

@Daniel Balan they can wait to the elections and vote against them . I know that in Ukraine is the only country in the world where the politicians say one thing and did another and it's dramatic, but they could wait one year and expulse them legally

What narrative? That the US pushed for an illegal change of government, then crossed the red line by joining Ukraine in NATO to provoke Russia after 8 years of civil war , and five minutes later destroyed the Nord Stream to ruin Germany and sell its expensive gas? Energy prices in Germany quadrupled and thousands of businesses went bankrupt. The crazy Germans got angry instead of being grateful, but luckily their president will always be at the US's disposal. And if for some reason Germans decide to vote for a party with a different tendency, their executives die mysteriously.

The Germans are in a terrible economic situation because of the energy outage. The population thinks they've been swindled, and the AFD, with so many mysterious deaths, may have a lot of influence and is pro-Russian. The party that mysteriously lost in Romania was also pro-Russian, In the Czech Republic, the pro-Russians have won, it seems to be a trend.

@BlueOak what could happen now? Russia already has Dombass, but that's not enough. It must defeat Ukraine, demilitarize it, and force it to become an independent but neutral country. This has enormous symbolic significance: an end to Western hegemony. A shift in polarity. That's why the West is so resilient.

Well, they did.

@BlueOak What you're saying is a possibility. The other possibility is the end of the war, and you know, memory nowadays is short. Then the deals restart, brics is growing, Germany needs gas, east Europe tends to Russia, EEUU is being unpredictable, Africa is tired of Europe, who knows the future

Russia’s Wartime Economy: Collapse Averted, Isolation Deepened 🔹 1. GDP and Growth Russia is not bankrupt. In fact, by 2024 its GDP had recovered to pre-war levels, growing around 3.6%, driven by: massive military spending, import substitution programs, and a complete trade reorientation toward Asia (China, India, Turkey). The ruble has stabilized, though inflation remains high (around 9–10%). Russia continues to produce and export energy, metals, and grain at record levels. 👉 The result: a functioning war economy, not prosperity, but far from collapse. 🔹 2. Foreign Trade Before the war, 45% of Russian trade was with Europe; now it’s less than 10%. Major new partners: China, India, and the UAE. Russia sells oil at a discount but in huge volumes, offsetting price losses. It imports microchips, machinery, and electronics through Kazakhstan, Turkey, and Armenia, bypassing sanctions. 👉 Russia has built a parallel trade network, slower but effective. 🔹 3. Industry and Employment The civilian sector (cars, aviation, tech) struggles, but the military-industrial complex now absorbs millions of workers. Unemployment is at historic lows (around 3%), though many jobs are low-productivity or military-linked. The economy is now heavily nationalized — almost all key sectors are under Kremlin control. 👉 This model works in wartime, but would be unsustainable in long-term peace. 🔹 4. Sanctions and Resilience Western sanctions failed to break Russia because: it is self-sufficient in energy and food, holds large gold and yuan reserves, and its population tolerates austerity far more than Western societies. However, costs are real: collapse of foreign investment, brain drain of skilled workers, and financial isolation. 🔹 5. Living Standards Prices have risen sharply, but the State keeps subsidies and jobs flowing. Moscow and St. Petersburg remain relatively stable, while rural areas face scarcity of imports and poorer healthcare. Private consumption has fallen, but there is no famine or social chaos. 🔹 6. Summary Russia is not collapsing — it is reconfiguring. The country has become more closed, militarized, and authoritarian, yet remains economically functional thanks to natural resources, state control, and Asian partnerships. It is, in essence, an armed autarky — not a failed state.

It's very different. I don't support Putin's war, but I understand it. Ukraine is tied to Russia, then the eternal radical Ukrainian nationalism appears once again, and a civil war begins. Then the Americans arrive and start giving weapons to these radical nationalists. And finally, they announce that Ukraine will join NATO, which they know perfectly well is pissing in the face of Russian pride. Russia is much weaker as a nation. If this happens, it's a national humiliation, and the Americans know it perfectly well. Russia is unstable. Putin thinks it's essential that this doesn't happen, and he acts. And he do with the support of all Russia. Russia is stronger now than before. That's a fact. Then Putin movement is successful in many senses

I don't know, it doesn't seem feasible to have a population of millions of people hostile to your regime subjugated nowadays; it's too costly. On the other hand, annexing an area where the majority wants it does make sense.

@Raze Okay, anyway, Palestinians generally think like you. They get caught up in hatred and occasionally commit massacres. You can argue all you want about the past, but the future is more important. What future do Palestinians hope to achieve with more massacres and rapes like the one on October 7th? Don't you understand that life is more valuable than such nonsense? The Jews give them the opportunity to evolve, to become a living society, with proyection, to escape misery. Why choose suicide? It's mentally retarded. The same one you demonstrate in every AI message. As Golda Meyer said, this shit will end when Arabs love their children more than they hate Jews, which is to say, never. Why? Because Islamic idiosyncrasy revolves around honor. Not about what's right, but honor. It's different. Right is internal; honor is external. It's how you're perceived, self-image, how Allah perceives you. Pure narcissism.

@Raze It's true that the Jews arrived with deeds of purchase (in 1947 they own the 7% of the land) and displaced some local workers. It's unfair. Throughout history, unfair things have happened more than once, but these things happen. There have been the wars that had to happen, and there were many, and now there's a situation in which there's absolutely nothing to gain by violent means, only the stupidity of honor. The honor that makes Arabs kill their daughters if they don't accept being raped by whomever the family decides. It's time for change. Maybe you could understand that this conflict is not about land, it's about identity, religion . It's purely emotional. Then remembering the past is useless, there have been thousands of conflicts about land much worse than this in the history, and they have been finished. This one is about identity, much more difficult, emotional and stupid

@Raze @Raze Then the starvation? On the subject of Israel's creation, you can cry for another 80 years if you want, and cause the deaths of hundreds of thousands, or evolve. It's a matter of choosing what you prefer. If you prefer to immolate yourself, you're free to do so. I believe the Arabs would gain much by opening their minds and looking to the future. You think they should continue on the path of hatred and war. In my opinion, that's stupid if your enemy is stronger than you, but everyone chooses. Seems that Muslims have a barrier, they don't like evolution. For them the most important is following the Quran and being absolutely prisoners of it. Strange behavior, seems like extremely stupid to an incredible level.