peachboy

Do you really understand this though? If you could go back in time and spend some time hanging out with your 5-year old self, would you find the issue of altruism so much of a challenge? Would it not naturally be the case that you would want to instinctively help/serve the 5-year old version of you, in any capacity, irrespective of whether they had the means to help you in return?

@Blackhawk Oh give me a break FFS. Grown-men electrocuting a non-armed woman for a non-violent clerical offence isn't justifiable in any fucking capacity. If a couple of burly officers cannot take control of a slim-framed woman without resorting to completely barbaric electrocution then they have failed in pretty much every category other than the Fucking Sadistic Cowards category. Failed as police, failed as men, failed as human, failed as spirit.

You mean like when a couple of Spanish policemen tase an un-armed woman simply because she took her mother to a psychologist's appointment against Covid regulations?

Because God is consciousness, and consciousness has no opposite. Absolute un-consciousness is impossible.

How can there be an end game when there is no end?

If you care more about your own mother than you do the homeless guy down the street, then you're doing it wrong. Love is the destruction of identity, be that personal identity or collective identity. It's not a test. It's not predicated on judgement or justice. There is only you, so love yourself. Forever and ever.

I think therefore Yahweh.

I saw one of his video's entitled "Why Loving Everyone Doesn't Work". I kinda lost interest after that. The premise of the video was flawed, was heavily based around personal identity, and didn't seem to grasp the implications of eternal existence. Something about three islands: An island inhabited by barbarians, an island inhabited by fluffy-rainbow-lightworkers, and an island habited by moderates. In his view, it was only a matter of time before the barbarians would invade Rainbow Island and slaughter all of the lightworkers including their pet unicorns. Therefore, we shouldn't love the barbarians. For one thing, this makes the mistake in thinking that lightwork/angelism is weak in the assumption that non-violence equals zero defense. Love does not mean zero defense. You only have to look at rabbits to know that "defense without suffering" is perfectly achievable, and with some creative imagination includes teleportation, invisibility, divine intelligence, and a box of magic tricks. But more importantly he fails to understand that each barbarian is simply an incarnation of you, played out at a different point in Eternity. Therefore, to take an antagonistic position against the barbarian is to take an antagonistic position against yourself. To not love the barbarian, is to not love yourself. To be frank, I think the man has a lot of fear in his energy field and should probably chill out a little.

My friend, if you can demonstrate or prove that un-consciousness has the capacity to occur then I'll personally buy you a sandwich. You said that "Unconsciousness is where consciousness came from." but alas I suspect you are deluding yourself. Absolute un-consciousness is logically and perfectly impossible. If you can prove otherwise then I'd certainly be impressed.

If I am having an experience of being a rock, then I'm conscious as the rock. Therefore the rock is conscious, because I am the rock.

Actually the issue about the rock as a seemingly inanimate object (separate from the animation of animals) only makes sense within the context of the sampling time of the finite human mind. It has been said that house-flies sample time at a different frequency from humans, so much so that a fast-moving human arm appears sluggish and slow from the perspective of the fly. In contrast, the fly appears whizzy and fast from the perspective of the human. Despite this, the two sampling frequencies are close enough to share the same space with a degree of mutual animation. Take the same concept, but translate it to the perspective of a rock and expand the sampling frequency to relative extremes. Perhaps something like one second of a rock's consciousness is equal to a million years of human existence. From the rock's perspective, the rapidly animating human would appear as ever-changing generations of indiscernible bubbling mush, like a kind of effervescent bacterium. In contrast, the rock would appear as a cold inanimate rock (even though it was actually an ever-changing indiscernible bubbling mush). So the idea that rocks are somehow different from animals is just another illusion within the broader illusion.

Only when I am the rock.

That's what she said. Let me know when I'm un-conscious and we can have a chat about it.

One easy way to spot a philosophical zombie is the inability for them to comprehend the impossibility of un-consciousness.

It's like an Asch Conformity experiment wrapped within a greater Asch Conformity experiment. On the one hand, if you vacuously take the vaccine without question, you fail the classic Asch test. On the other hand, if you start subscribing to external conspiracy then you jettison your divine sovereignty, and thus fail the greater Asch test that pertains to the Divine. After all, you're God. What's the worst that can happen?