Someone here

@AtheisticNonduality thanks for recommendation. Will check that out. Although illusion of separate self has been completely broken through in this body-mind to such a degree that it's laughable at this point that anything can be intentionally adjusted in a system that is not real at the core.

So I thought I would share this.. I know a lot of people have this solipsism dilemma.. I know I have.. But recently I've come to realize what is actually the case about the "world out there" . Is there a world out there?. To frame the question appropriately.. Is there a deeper independent reality to what you see out there outside of your perception of it? When you don't perceive the world... Is the world still there?. Plain and simple.. No. There is no world out there.. Not only when you don't perceive it. But right now as you "think" that you are perceiving it. Because what you think is the world out there is actually you. The problem is you think there is me here and a world there and me is looking at the world. That's duality. The observer is the observed. And this is meant literally. What you think is a screen right now that is being perceived by you via a medium of perception system (eyes) is actually what you are. You are not looking at the screen right now. You are the screen. And this is the case for any other duality. You and your thoughts are actually one thing. You and your feelings are actually one thing. Meaning there is no you that is feeling feelings.. The feelings are what you are. Evident by when there are no feelings there are no feeler as well. Similarly when there is no perceiver there are no perceptions. And since there is in fact no duality between the perceiver and the perceived.. There is neither a you nor a world out there.. There is one unbroken actuality. And this is it. In this actuality there is actually no "you" and no "other". If you try to pin point where or what exactly is" you" in direct experience and what is or where exactly is "other" you will fail miserably. Because this boundary is completely imaginary. It's all one thing. There is no you right here perceiving a world out there. It's all here. Here is there. You is the world. So what you call other people are literally you. The entire actuality of what's showing up in consciousness right now is you. Not just what you are identified with as your body. The entire field of consciousness is you. From this place there is neither you nor a world as two separate things. There is only what is. And what is.. Is one unbroken actuality with no divisions. If you lose that awareness of clarity and revert back to thinking that I am me right here looking at the world out there.. Then a question might arise about the nature of the relationship between me and the world.. Am I projecting the world? Imagining it like a dream that has no reality outside my own experience? Or is it just there and I m merely perceiving it..?. But the whole question is based on a false sense of self that is separate from the whole. In order to resolve this dilemma you must sit down and kill yourself. Kill this illusory sense of I'm me here somewhere inside this body. There is no self separate from the world. It's just a sense of self. Just a sense. It comes and goes. Like all other senses. There is actually some centers in the brain responsible for the sense of the self .. If we shut down those centers in the brain you will go poof. You will be gone as a self. You were never real to begin with. But sure as hell you appear to be real. But if you sit down and try to draw the boundary between you and the world. You will discover you are literally the entire world. You are the totality of what is. So to summarize.. There is no you or other people or a world out there. But if looked at them from the view point of separation. Then a question arises about the relationship between the me and the world. But that whole separation is illusory. Therefore there is no place for the question about the relationship between nonexistent things. So.. Other people don't exist as other people. They exist as you.

You don't sound like interested or ready yet to wake up from the illusions of "You" "knowing" "" paradox-free truth ". That's a level of comprehending that you are not ready for yet. And that's okay everyone are at a certain place in the path. But you have to come to know that ultimate reality is without distinctions.

No. Ignorance is perfectly okay. Everything that IS.. Is that doing what it does. Everything that is is god. The proplem with " I don't know" is you think the reason that you don't know is because of some lack in your capacity to know.. Or because the truth is hiding it's ass from you somewhere because the universe is doing a conspiracy against you... If only you realize you don't exist to know anything.. And hence there is nothing to know.. Because truth is omnipresent and it doesn't get better than what is here right now. But YOU as the devil are doing a conspiracy against YOU as god. Paradox is your friend.

I don't know that. There is no me to know it. There is no me or you here. And there is nothing here. There is only wholeness infinity consciousness God unfolding. And that's not something that I know. That's something that I don't know because I don't exist. You are talking to a body - mind that has seen through duality. And knows himself as no thing. Careful with your clever little games.

Maybe the very nature of Truth is not objective. It's basically However it happend to click with ya. See the ultimate answer to questions such as "how" and "why" is I don't fucking know. And that is the only true answer. Because any "why" you impose upon reality is limited.. You have to ground that "why" by another why.. And so on.. Drop all whys and hows.. And you will find the answer to everything.

A dream appearing within nothing for absolutely no fucking reason at all.

@Bulgarianspirit lol this lady is fucking awesome,

Can't happen. You can't know who you are because the knower and the known are one. You can just be what you are. And the irony is there is no you In the middle of this whole thing.

@Meister_Eckhart well in a sense from your relative perspective you are really the only one here cuz everyone else are just appearances within your own experience. The thing is they appear to you to be having an experience of their own.. So whether that's actually the case or not.. You are going to deal with them from that lense anyways. So what's the difference? See there is no difference actually. You are alone and together at the same time. It's all a matter of perspective. No one single perspective of reality is ultimately true. Cuz reality is absolutely infinte. There is nothing to force it to be a certain way. Solipsism being a limited way that reality can be.. Can't be the ultimate truth.

Everything is everything. Vomiting a rotten food is vomiting a rotten food. Love is when you cuddle up on your mommy's chest. Ah shit here we go again.... Jed might come now and write a lengthy unexplainable essay ?

Infinite everything. Don't let Jed fool you.

Yes I'm having an experience right now just as you.. I'm a real person with feelings emotions sensations etc.. You are not the only one who is experiencing reality.. Everyone else are experiencing it as well. But you can't have access to my experience. If you can have access to my experience you would be me. Which means you won't be you anymore. For you to be you.. You have to be you and not me.. If you can experience me you would be me and not you. ?

Fun IS the lack of the sense of individuality. ?

Gotta get over this notion of "the individual". @An young being

You didn't wake up yet. Reality is A dream within a dream within a dream within a dream.m within a dream.. Within nothingness.

@INIT if you see an animal moving.. How is the thing that you call "movement" and "animal" separate or distinct? Is there an animal out there and a separate entity called movement? You don't see an animal and a movement of an animal.. You see one indivisible phenomenon. The mover is the movement is the object that is moving. When fingers move.. The fingers are the mover.. The fingers are the movement.. The fingers are the objects that is moving. Everything moves itself. It all can be solved by understanding nonduality. Any duality you imagine (mover-movement) is imaginary.

Sure they appear to be moving. And that's it. Fingers moving. Where is this "mover"? . Just fingers moving. The mover is an idea. There is no one moving. That is duality. Something moving. And a movement. But notice these two things (the something that's moving and the movement of it) are ONE THING.

What do you mean by "one"? If you mean a separate distinct object or thing.. There is no such thing.. So no one is moving because there is no "one" as in a separate object in reality.. Reality is one unified whole.. It appears as if there are separate objects moving relative to each other.. But the big picture is its all one uinfied eternal field of consciousness. Since its infinite you can't say it's moving or still.. Because movement is relative to a frame of reference.. And since reality is ONE Infinite field.. There is nothing outside of it to be a frame of reference... You can't ask if reality as a whole is moving or still.. Because you have to get outside of reality to measure that.. But there is no outside of reality. Wherever you are you are inside of reality.

Nothing.

Sit still.. Close your eyes.. Try as hard as you can to still your body completely.. Internally and externally.. In terms of thoughts sensations emotions etc.... Notice that you can't.. That the movement of consciousness happens automatically without" you " having any say in it.

It seems that way.. That's right.. But actually there is no you inside the body observing anything.. Similarly there is no me inside the body observing anything... Same for all other bodies.. Therefore no one exists in the universe.. Neither you. Nor other people.. The universe is empty of "persons". It's one unified field of consciousness. This consciousness has no inherent boundaries. Your mind (which doesn't exist) draws imaginary boundaries to construct a sense if indentity. But whatever you identify as yourself will become yourself. And whatever you identify as others will become others. The actuality is there is neither you nor others as a fixed separate things with clear boundaries.. That's why you can imagine those boundaries however you want.

@Gesundheit no offense at all taken. You just didn't understand anything from what I wrote. I will summarize it for ya.. There is no you my dear! .. That's a myth.. Go ahead tell me what is fuck is you? You are not "perceiving" anything.. If there is no perceiver (no you) how can there be perception? So there's no world when you're not perceiving it because there is no you to perceive anything. Therefore there is no world even when you are perceiving it. Because world =other than you. If there is no you there is no other there is no world. So what the fuck is THIS then? Find out.

@Forestluv Thanks. Makes sense. and I'm trying to understand her perspective. But the problem is she didn't provide any. One can hardly claim that he genuinely hates someone or wish him death if that person didn't cause direct harm to oneself. So that's why I claim her wishing him harm has something related to some kind of lack or repressed anger inside of her.