Osaid

It's such a Leo move to disagree with a hyper-intelligent alien species off the get-go

Up, Up, Down, Down, Left, Right, Left, Right, B, A, Start

Since when was science into koans?

It does sound pretty hot tbh

For the record, I have nothing against succubus entities who want to watch me wank. I'm all for mutual benefits, just as long as you keep yourself invisible or whatever.

How is this a simple fact lmao. "Hey dude it's easy to quit porn, just realize that there is a succubus entity siphoning your energy everytime you do it, just pay a little bit more attention next time you wank. Very simple and factual. In fact, it's so simple and factual, that you have to buy my detailed book to learn more about it."

I only remember things that stood out to me as unusual when I was a baby. I could tell even as a baby that the experience wasn't normal, which is why I remember it I think. Babies are smart enough to understand facial recognition, so seeing a ghost/entity was definitely comprehensible to me, and I even had the foresight to check that I wasn't dreaming and I glanced at my mother to see her reaction to it, but aside from that I didn't care much or could do much. As a baby you're just looking at random things and you have to sort of accept them as normal and move on because your knowledge and capability is so limited. Otherwise you're right, there is not much else there. All my memories as a baby are just things that were extraordinary in nature, so a few odd experiences here and there. My memory of this experience is still quite vivid somehow, probably because it was just so odd that my brain didn't want to forget.

I was thinking about making a jab on this thread actually. You know me too well.

Heard about this, super interesting. I personally recall an experience as a baby where I saw an entity/spirit/ghost with perfect visual clarity. That horror stereotype about kids seeing invisible spirits and ghosts is really true TBH. I remember looking at my mom to make sure I'm not dreaming and wondering if she could see it as well. I also recall another experience but I honestly could not tell if that one was a dream or not, probably something more hypnopompic. There was also a lot of sleepwalking as a kid, wonder if that was normal or just me.

I was personally entirely under the impression that the alien is not using supernatural abilities by a technical definition, but some kind of genetic or biological capability that they are born with which is common for their species. I was even theorizing that the green gas was somehow related to the psychic information channelling. This is similar to that quote where it says something like "Any sufficiently advanced technology will look like magic." I believe in this case the technology is genetic/biological/technological and it is just the case that for humans a similar feat would require supernatural or mystical abilities, but for aliens it is more normal. What are the chances we ran into the one alien who knows about mystical/psychic abilities? It must be common and normal for them, similar to how it is normal for a human to be born with access to a smartphone or how it is normal for humans to be born with two hands. If psychic channeling exists for humans, an alien could do it completely differently, kind of like riding a horse compared to driving a car to reach the same destination. On top of that, I interpreted their claim about healing as something much more open-ended. They are not saying that everything can be healed, but that the human body's healing potential is being neglected. I really feel like this section is more impercise or lost in translation, as I don't think they genuinely believe that "all healing" can be taken care of, if you want to take that statement at face value.

Dude why are you so mean to the aliens lmao

The alien didn't say anything about solipsism? Is this guy even AWAKE™?

You shed your previous belief that "other people have subjective experience", but you do not transcend it or see through it. You replace it with another belief, perhaps a more spiritual or metaphysical one: "Other people are programmed, other people are this, that, etc." You can play that game infinitely. But what you're playing around with is like an intellectual play-doh; a poor substitute for the real thing. The medium that you are using to perceive the existence of "other people" is wrong, throw the entire thing away. You are simply changing the medium and thinking it is somehow more correct or real than the previous one.

"Other mind" is different from "conscious experience." But most people would interpret them as the same thing, which causes the initial confusion. Most people are inquiring about conscious experience, not another mind. "Other mind" is there, but not "other consciousness." When I say something is not there, I am saying that nothing is there, not non-existence. There is a difference between "nothing" and "non-existence." Non-existence is an intellectual conclusion, you cannot experience something that does not exist. Experientially, consciousness says nothing (literally) about what does and doesn't exist, that is intellect and duality. Consciousness is just purely what is experienced.

Mutually beneficial. All the smart girls are left with men who care about intelligence. All the dumb ones are left with men who don't care about intelligence. Why should someone smart be with someone who cannot appreciate intelligence? Leave it for the sapiosexuals.

Same thing.

I was pointing to how the thread title says "conscious on a relative level."

Since when has consciousness been relative? What kind of BS are you learning from Leo?

I think he liberated himself from this thread as well.

For someone named "Godishere" they are doing a bad job of being here.

Wild. Great minds think alike I guess.

Would be funny asf if this guy just never answers anything like that homosexuality thread.

This "trap" only exists in a pseudo way where you believe you can separate what is spiritual from life itself and that you can "get out of it" and "get into it" like you're leaving and entering the school book club or something. You have no choice in the matter. You are life. What is that? You have 100 years to explore it, and you can't not explore it. If your idea of spirituality is putting drugs up yourself for 30 days straight then I can see your concern, but I would contest that to be an superfluous definition and ultimately another dichotomy between life and spirituality.

True, but keep in mind that they did have to artificially manufacture some kind of emotional intelligence in ChatGPT so that it wouldn't give you ideas on how to murder people. So in a real life scenario someone with no emotions would probably be more of a neutral sociopath or something, although I don't think such a person could ever truly exist, we can only observe that scenario through AI it seems.

ChatGPT is smarter and more understanding than most humans. If you value any of those despite a non-existent emotional capacity, building a relationship is very natural. Have you ever watched a show or movie and felt emotions? Do you think the movie has emotion? Why feel emotions or build a relationship about things that don't have emotions, you ask? Well, you do that all the time, be cognizant of it.