remember

the sea, the wind the sun a smile on someones face a bell in the wind. its all around you if you dare. nothing is free, but still freedom is a choice.

being loving does not always mean surrendering - it’s also not about seeing low consciousness as loving. low consciousness often has the effect of low consciousness aswell, but love is not low consciousness it’s the attempt to elevate consciousness, which means maximizing or elevating the level of love. if you separate yourself from love, you separate yourself from the source of love within you. discerning between source and qualitative output, which is not speech but consciousness - you can surrender to a lot... sometimes low consciousness is what elevates consciousness - and in general its very difficult to discern source from source as consciousness always leaves aftereffects.

@mandyjw yes, i don’t know why but i don’t actually count you into trustable resources for informations about experiences - it’s probably the peter and the wolve theme. you usually have too many personal games going. and you certainly have issues with a lot of foods, which could be a meat alternative. although the celery juice is really not bad - tried it for two days in a row, with a little ginger and lime. can’t say yet if it is against rheumathoid arthritis or not... and it feels kind of green, doesn’t it? @mandyjw sorry it’s a bit harsh - you probably have some kind of stomach issue, why these foods are problematic for you, maybe because you are often very intense and overdo it then a bit. don’t want to criticize you, i just have the feeling you didn’t arrive at the source of the problem jet, and suppose you are rather the exception than the rule. if sth is not good for you then don’t overdo it!

yes, in a lot of cases that’s the only way, at least until you can handle it - and then the time frame in which you expose yourself to toxicity is also relevant, resiliency is like a protective shield which at some point gives in (or gets thinner). my parents live together so i mainly go help my mom, the codependent who gets the most of it - but my dad also has a side to him which is likable, so i also try to help him to correct his worldview a little, so maybe its the green about my dad which makes his case a little different. the thing is of course, personality traits are existing and some of them are maybe not healable, but i‘m sure it’s possible even for narcissists to work on themselves, better even if they accept a diagnosis (which in a lot of cases is the point where either society or they themself go into denial)

narcissism can have different colours, my dad has a red/blue/green coding - the point about coding a personality disorder, is that it may help to realize if people you know have serious issues. if you encounter red in someone, the person often has some kind of personality disorder or is a victim of such, treatable or not. if you grew up with a problematic parent you can for example also start to understand the problem from a more distant perspective it’s easier to handle the behavior if you see through the actual behavior while meeting them. or also to understand your own reactions and shadow aspects. codependency sometimes also means there is some kind of don‘t talk about it spell on the side of the codependent to the abuser.

@fluffy everyone can become a competitive asshole, does not have anything to do with iq, and by the way iq does not safe people from stupidity. even einstein enabled idiotism...

@mandyjw ok mandy we got it...and it’s ok ? we love you, still.

is home slaughtery sociopathic? factory farming is so much cleaner!

our neighbours had rabbits, we went feeding them dandelions once in a while with their grand children. when he walked over with the axe we knew we had to go playing on the other side of the house...we basically lived vegetarian.

everything is interconnected and interdependent, natural flow state, creativity and creation become one. it does not add to yellow, it’s a completely new style, yellow is more organizational one, with still one or more leaders, turquoise is not making many selective differences anymore, it’s a complete new evaluation system and way of interacting.

relative? all hierarchies and personal world constructions exist relative and parallel to each other. yellow communicates with, organizes and delegates between or with all tier one stages.

mhhh, to me it looks more like expansion, in every stage, pretty two dimensional - in yellow you basically start with origami and get into the third dimension, which then opens up all other dimensions and sub dimensions.

yes of course, does the term feminism have a negative connotation? if so then actually why is this a stigmatization? feminists fight for women’s rights, they are triggered to a point by negative and abusive behavior towards women in society sometimes domestic abuse, but not only that they ask for equal rights as a different kind of human, or is it called huwomanty? no it’s humanity. which does not mean all women or all men are equal - if men get triggered by that and start shaming women for getting progressive about sometimes even systemic abuse what actually does make that of the men? masculists? the problem with shaming feminists for adopting an more agressive point of view is in reality not their aggressive style it’s because it’s an aggressive style of a woman. which is one of the problems which in the first place created feminism, because that’s already a problem for many men. and it’s really strange for women how men seem to resist the possibility that getting triggered by a feminist is already backwards and the attempt to controll female narratives.

well i guess there is stuff even someone in the middle would not love to compromise on. i guess compromising or not compromising is not really the issue if there is stuff which is in a sense humanistically not to further compromise on. the world could not compromise with fascism, i doubt that a lot has changed since then, if the world is still doing then probably because it is difficult to make systems politically resilient enough. freud said the only way to prevent that is culture, wherever culture fails you will see a relapse into barbaric behavior. if you still are able to act humanly in that case you know you have culture - this is why maybe humanism (and that’s a personal preference) is the only longterm answer against fascism, which does not mean to let fascism happen, but more to see the signs early on when it develops. but why would anyone value ethics, if they could develop power?

yes man absolutely, maybe we should all be fascists!

i did not say that social fascists are liberal fascists, and i did not say i was a communist - i count myself more into the liberal left, but still i discern between fascism and socialism and communism as political theories - and communism means it can’t be capitalistic, so there has never been communism, technically that’s easy maths. not any high class science.

no exactly technically there was never communism. but technically you say there is no such thing as liberal fascism so how can it be that there might be other mix forms? what is a chimera? maybe you could ask yourself that, and then try to deny the half animal part about you exists.

yes that’s why it’s liberal fascism. it must actually be true to be not liberal fascism. fascism is always authoritarian even if hidden.

that’s pointing out the what’s probably really happening the most cases, as far as i always understood the dynamic of abusive relationships: it first of all is often the case that abusive guys can be cute in the beginning and even be more cute and loving and passionate than average, so women don’t always fall for the abuser who only show small signs of such, which can be overlooked by women if in love enough, but they fall for an image of a loving hot guy, or an interesting personality. its difficult for a lot of women to understand it later on, that a loving person can have these sides, and its probably more difficult to leave an abusive relationship if not having the comparison to what healthy means. these cases def also exist the other way round. that guys stay with abusive girlfriends, so it’s not a onesided phenomenon. to get to the root of it is probably to ask why people stay in abusive relationships in general - why the abuser does is probably more obvious than why the abused does. and there is a huge difference between situations escalating, with both partners showing signs and different grades of being mean and quarreling and showing abusive behavior and then changing directions towards a different dynamic. i guess when abusive behavior shows first it is often still in that range. mostly abusive relationships develop slowly, or in some severe cases so abruptly that it’s difficult to even get a clear hold of what exactly is going on. getting out of a love relationship can be like cutting you off from drugs as in the first phase a person is massively exposed to hormones in that sense all your love experiences play into falling in love, the bias of a loving family can be in the same way dangerous as the bias of an abusive one. abuse can happen in so many different ways, that no one can foresee them all. psychosocial dynamics are extremely complex - so yeah why are women often the victim?

the moment you start really getting into understanding fascism you start to see it everywhere until the point you start to see it developing in yourself. - that’s not a quote that’s a phenomenon. people tend to use the term nazi for fascists very often but in sense of political right wing ideology there is a small difference between them, which actually only showed in their far far extreme. fascism is not systemic murder, yet, although fascism can go to the point of quieting another’s opinion by systemic force, torture and this leading to another kind of systemic murder which is justified by making the systemic structure of it a row of single cases. while naziism is social darwinism fascism is national darwinism in some sense the difference is the excess of fascistoid outplay. so if analyzing the underlying psychosocial dynamics about soft fascism and hard fascism it gets really messy, especially as fascism is always supported through codependency. you could def say the middle of the right is probably more in a codependency than being really fascists, but then again if that supports fascist tendencies, where to draw the line? - fascism usually tends to escalate into one or the other form of political oppression of at least free speech - if free speech is used against itself it is def getting crazily difficult to stop fascistoid opinion from doing its work as free speech would need to allow itself to enslave itself. not all fascists are nazis, but all nazis are fascists and even if it might never reach that extreme the possibility of it is already existing in the structure of fascism.

its basically a hommage to joseph beuys fat corner, probably. i once met a woman who was friends with him that time he did the first one - he did not even have to pay for raw material. how disastrous. don’t know if he ever got money for his fat works. playing with food is def tooooo liberal. and don’t do it at home if you have a carpet.

mhh i‘m actually not sure about that, that’s why i‘m sceptical. between chaos and dictatorship are several different concepts, of closed and open systems. its even possible to flatten a hierarchy through social interaction, so even if a person gets payed more can be that the workflow is extremely openminded and actually flattened because if payment equals competency it’s a natural hierarchy, competency can also mean a person is able to let other people decide because they know the details better and also are more competent, in my perspective that’s also a flattened hierarchy.

you would need to explain what a flat hierarchy is in your opinion. i‘m actually very sceptical about people who speak against flat hierarchies, it sounds much to much like a blue self bias, which does not believe in progressive organizations. in some sense yes of course a flat one storey hierarchy system would only work for small groups. but a flattened two or three storey hierarchy system with not one person on the top but a team where every person has different fields of expertise or sections of responsibility can work. it might not work in politics, because in politics you need a representative, someone who takes the responsibility - but even that is devided into two people in some countries, i‘m also seeing a problem in regressing into too much of blue if you rant so much about libertarianism - even in libertarianism there are different kinds of libertarians, there are also progressive creative ideas which are actually not libertarian but just showing alternatives, as they are already developed in small businesses or organizations. after your new video about property rights it seems like you would put these people also into the libertarian category, because they work fine in the society we are already living in and usually in the middle class sector as they are not that aggressively going after money. they work fine even though their hierarchical structure is flattened. so careful about getting to rigid and inflexible. people usually construct powerhirarchies because they are fearful and don’t want to try new concepts of living, it’s backwards. flat hierarchy does not mean no hierarchy or no system or loosened laws.

i‘d def check in that case if the plants might be poisonous before buying them. at least have some cacti with prickly pears! the nopales ones, yummy.

@Amandine it fits quite well to the title of the video, doesn’t it? leo actually has no property rights, we should make him change the flooring and at least have cacti and aloe on his balcony or terrace or whatever is hidden behind the glas piece. don‘t blame me - he said that himself.