Ulax

@StarStruck I'd disagree on the first point. And the second point i think you are partially correct. Tho i disagree that you can learn the most from people you demonise.

@StarStruck I don't mind his orange, its his red (women as property) that I don't like and I think we need to careful about.

@Space The oracle has spoken

Lmao I found that vid partially reassuring actually. I thought analytic philosophers were difficult until I started trying to read some continental philosophers. I found the latter absolutely nuts to try and understand in the most part - a lot of jargon.

@Raze I think that perspective may have some truth to it from an economic standpoint. However, I think your comment here presents a bit of a naive perspective. I don't think your opinion here or Musk's approach understands the systemic nature of a place twitter. Imo opening twitter up for discussion in a way that doesn't have serious negative consequences, i.e. making the platform abusive, breeding hate crimes IRL, would be a complex, nuanced task, which I don't think Musk understands, and I see no acknowledgment of in your comment. In a way, I'm deeply worried that Musk doesn't understand what he's got himself into, and think its not unlikely that his leadership will cause a lot of harm to a lot of vulnerable folks, including the deaths of quite a few.

Does anyone have any media (i.e. movie scenes) that they can share around the idea of opening up and then being judged and ridiculed about it? The harsher the better. Tho i would still like it to feel somewhat realistic, and not like some mickey mouse villain.

I think its useful to talk about folks like Tate in some aspects. However, I think this thread has served its purpose. I think the mods or Leo should this thread at this point. The girl who is interviewing seems to me to present herself well but I get the sense she is clueless to the dangers of Tate. I think she is very niave where she talks flippantly about how wives should be seen as the property of their husband. Brain dead take imo. I think its likely she has a trauma bond with Tate.

@Carl-Richard ?

@Cat_eyes lol

Lol I think i saw this yesterday too. I love how loads of the comments are folks apparently elated at the prospect that Leo does indeed have legs lol.

@BeHereNow I think you're projecting a load of things onto Peterson and not realising/ accepting that that is what you are doing.

Could have been Kung Fu Panda for me

I'd look into Dr Ramani's content

I think he is a v useful philosopher to study to help transcend the dogmas of western philosophy. Tho I think folks tend to aggrandise him a lot.

Ye I watched this a while back and didnt have a fucking clue what was going on ?

@2ndComing In bathtubs? ?

@Julian gabriel I think you're likely unconsciously using that as a way to meet your need for significance. To my understanding, if you found an alternative way to meet your need for significance then I think these thoughts would likely stop.

Perhaps just let it go, and sit with the emotions that come up. I think it could a useful life experience around the idea of learning how to deal with relationships that end without closure.

@Raptorsin7 When I wrote the message I was experimenting with using heavy metal to try to dive into some repressed/ suppressed rage. And I thought you might have some supressed/ repressed rage as well. So I thought it could be of value to you too.

@StarStruck In other words, I liked your way of thinking there

Good luck dude. You ever fucked with heavy metal btw?

Pride comes before the fall

@StarStruck Damn, I rate your way of thinking here

@StarStruck I think I read one of them. Didn't really like it to tho, to my recollection. I believe I tend to feel inspired when i listen to various of his speeches tho. In some aspects, I think Gary Vee was my version of Tate back in the day

@StarStruck What's your opinion on Gary Vee?