Nivsch

Have you considered the full scope of consequences of an opposite decision before you decided what is more depressing than the other?

Exactly the same and 100 times more massive is the Iranian-Qataric-Aljazeera multi billionaire propaganda empire.

@Karmadhi Israel has historically released hundreds and sometimes thousands of prisoners (among them many terrorists) for only handful Israelis in return for example when Gilad Shalit was the only one who was freed in 2011 for 1027 Palestinian prisoners. The point of this guy is understandable but right now this is really Bibi who is part of the problem that makes decisions from political survival considerations. And above that, Israel is very polarized in its values systems especially in the last decade.

hamas is very active in the west bank. In fact most of the suicide bombing in the 90s and early 00s came from there, what forced Israel to enter this area much deeper, actually until this day.

It is true that at the beginning after the trauma the war was in a sort of consensus, but from couple of months ago it has started, at least the current phase of the war that endangers the hostages, to be controversial and Israel is very splitted right now.

Tel aviv main road is totally blocked. Right now from my car. Protest on the road between the cars too. I wanted to participate too but couldn't. Tomorrow a general strike in the economy in Israel. The reason is the murder of 6 hostages at the weekend when everyone know Bibi is one of the main obstacles to a deal. And probably also a general feeling that this government do all the wrong things in inner and outer issues and ruin the country.

Another stage Yellow+ page in how to heal trauma and the nervous system in general in a responsible thorough way that is very different from the narrow magic-pills-like techniques many (stage green?) mentors fall into: https://www.instagram.com/irenelyon?igsh=cWhzYTRqZ3Z4YzVi

Yes. Ok (checked more accurately) and: 11 centuries Jews were the majority from 10 BCE to 1 CE From 13 BCE to 11 BCE it is unknown whether they were majority or not because they were in a process of settling. From 1 CE to 3 CE minority under Rome but still a significant part of the population. 4 CE majority. 5 to mid 20 CE - minority. If I understood it all right. Yes this is an interesting question I don't know for now what is more true. Probably education through all those centuries took place, but also the maybe bad experience Jews felt when were abroad all those centuries what perhaps made them want their own country again. To say how can they feel emotions (except through education) to a land their generations have never step on? Well at least they could know by negation what isn't good for them. And then they crossed it with education. If I were a Jew back then in Europe in the middle ages, could I intuite I want to go to the land of Israel even without education? I will have to learn more about the countries Jews were in during 5th-19th centuries before I have a better answer.

Jews were really the majority on this land for many centuries, before became a minority for another similar amount of centuries, and then the Zionist movement started when the emotions became critically too strong to go back to this land.

If you deal with your challenges and problems directly then this is the true spirituality. You can only want to quit something you subconsciously feel as a bypass.

Former Head of IDF (2002-2005) and Minister of Defense (2013-2016) Moshe Ya'alon. Translated from hebrew (as always).

+1 ❤️

If its about to widen the way we look at reality and integrate more perspectives in addition and not instead of anything then ok.

I disagree that truth equal sickness or insanity. Its actually the opposite.

@BlueOak Thanks for the investment. All those are from your direct experience and your independent conclusions? I can relate to part of them, but I am not into solipsism and don't believe anything about turquoise I have no intuition to by myself. Why that a specific arrangement of neurotransmitters induced by some kind of psychedelic will show the most fundamental reality? I can understand that this is part of reality and a perspective. But who is to say that a psychedelic state, or some organization of neurotransmitters is more true than an another neurotransmitters combination? I think this is an emotional and biased decision affected by what the person want to be true. Anyway the Love thing I like and think there is a lot to it.

Can you explain what did you mean by that? With an example even if you can

Nice point

Anything you will hear about turquoise is not actually what turquoise is, but only some trials to translate to words implicit experiences when what YOU get from the word is mostly a distorted picture. Only you will know in real time how turquoise is supposed to feel and it might be different than things that you hear. Think for yourself what does it mean to grow above yellow. Don't rely on answers from outside. It will happen in your unique way through your unique challenges and not in the way it is written in spiritual books.

+1 ❤

@MarioGabrielJ With the necessary modesty I will say I think what is going on is that God means to good, but won't give you the answers to life on a silver platter.

You really don't need anything except your biggest problems. They are your super highway to growth if you only relate to them like this. No need to engage with any turquoise person, nor to learn about turquoise strategies or spiritual slogans. It will only be a bypass and won't grow you nearly as effectively as the key tool above.

@BlueOak You don't believe you can be Turquoise in this life?

They themselves also use this word Zionism when they describe themselves in the videos you watch?

Ok fair I understand. In school, Zionism has been defined to us as the aspiration of the Jewish people to their own land, and thats it. Seems like the exact definition of this word is subjectively given depend on the piece of the cake (= reality) one wants to focus on. For example the center-left camp will define the exact same word by their own values of equality, acceptance etc. The problem is that subconsciously the word implies a generalized meaning what can be weaponized to unfair propaganda purposes by extreme leftists abroad for example. This is what a bit difficult here for me with this word I learned about from its more pure meaning and intention. Nevertheless, your definiton although different then mine, is fair in my opinion in the way it focuses on the problem itself and explains itself nuancly.