integral

When he takes it himself for 2 years then comes back with the report ill start taking what hes saying seriously.

If you mean humans will loss any interest in doing anything because they have god mode, I disagree because this is not the same as a video game because this is an infinite game. We will live in a world of endless discovery, I could just go off and discover forever in some Direction. The first thing im making is nano machines to give me perfect state, But If you mean a handful of people will rule the world in an AI apocalypse for the next 2,000 years then, I agree that's pretty bad, and we have to solve the corruption problem.

Give your best ideas guys. Step 1: Do NOT INVEST IN All Retail Chains (Walmart, Target, Costco, Kroger, etc.) All Restaurant Chains (McDonald’s, Starbucks, Yum Brands, Darden, etc.) All Apparel & Footwear Brands (Nike, Adidas, Gap, H&M, Zara, etc.) All Auto Manufacturers (GM, Ford, Tesla, Toyota, etc.) All Airlines & Cruise Lines (Delta, American, United, Carnival, Royal Caribbean, etc.) All Entertainment & Media Companies (Disney, Netflix, Comcast, Sony Pictures, AMC, etc.) All Home & Hardware Retailers (Home Depot, Lowe’s, Ace Hardware, Sherwin‐Williams, etc.) All Personal Care & Consumer Packaged Goods (Procter & Gamble, Unilever, Clorox, Kimberly‐Clark, etc.) All Technology Hardware & E‐Commerce (Apple, Samsung, Dell, Amazon, eBay, etc.) All Financial Firms (Commercial) (Chase, Bank of America, Wells Fargo — retail banking collapses without deposits/loans, though government may nationalize critical banks) - - - All Oil & Gas Majors (ExxonMobil, Chevron, BP — no industrial demand; governments may seize resources) Apparel & FootwearGap Inc. · Macy’s · Nordstrom · Foot Locker · Nike (retail) · Under Armour · Lululemon Electronics & Specialty RetailBest Buy · GameStop · Newegg · Barnes & Noble Casual DiningChipotle · Panera Bread · Darden Restaurants (Olive Garden, LongHorn) · Brinker (Chili’s) · The Cheesecake Factory Movie Theaters & VenuesAMC Entertainment · Cineworld (Regal) · Cinemark · Live Nation Mid‐Tier LodgingMGM Resorts · Caesars · Choice Hotels · La Quinta · Extended Stay America Big‐Box & Grocery ChainsWalmart · Target · Costco · Kroger · Albertsons · Publix · Aldi Fast Food & Quick ServiceMcDonald’s · Yum! Brands (KFC/Pizza Hut/Taco Bell) · Restaurant Brands Intl. (Burger King/Tim Horton’s) · Starbucks · Subway Home Improvement & Consumer ElectronicsThe Home Depot · Lowe’s · Ace Hardware · AT&T · Verizon · CenturyLink/Lumen Automakers & DealersGeneral Motors · Ford · Stellantis (Chrysler/Jeep) · Tesla · Toyota · CarMax · AutoNation · AutoZone · O’Reilly Budget AirlinesSpirit Airlines · Frontier Airlines · Alaska Air Group · JetBlue Foodservice & Wholesale Dist.Sysco · US Foods · Performance Food Group · UNFI Utilities & Telecom (Bare Min)Duke Energy · NextEra Energy · Southern Company · Exelon · Comcast (Xfinity) · Verizon · AT&T Pharma & Medical SupplyPfizer · Johnson & Johnson · Merck · McKesson · Cardinal Health · CVS Health · Walgreens Consumer Packaged Goods (CPG)Procter & Gamble · Unilever · Clorox · Kimberly‐Clark · Coca‑Cola · PepsiCo · Nestlé Consumer Electronics & TechApple · Samsung · Dell · HP Inc. · Amazon · eBay · Sony Entertainment & MediaDisney · Netflix · Comcast (NBCUniversal) · Sony Pictures · Warner Bros. · Spotify · Lionsgate Airlines & Cruise LinesDelta Air Lines · American Airlines · United Airlines · Southwest Airlines · Carnival Cruise Line · Royal Caribbean · Norwegian Cruise Line Financial Services (Retail)JPMorgan Chase · Bank of America · Wells Fargo · Citigroup · Goldman Sachs (retail banking) Oil & Gas MajorsExxonMobil · Chevron · BP · Royal Dutch Shell · TotalEnergies Transportation & LogisticsFedEx · UPS · DHL · Union Pacific · CSX Corporation Rationale (95 % Unemp.): With 19 out of 20 adults unemployed, no real private‐sector demand exists. A handful of minimal government‐run facilities (ration centers, public hospitals) might operate, but every for‐profit enterprise outside direct state control fails. Step 2: Be pro-Capitalism “Why UBI Matters for Corporations” If 30 %+ unemployment hits without UBI, ~ $1 trillion of U.S. retail revenue disappears almost overnight. Major retailers (e.g., Walmart, Target) face bankruptcy. By providing even modest monthly UBI (e.g., $500–$1,000 per adult), these companies preserve a baseline of consumer demand that keeps their cash flow from collapsing entirely. Corporate Lobbying Pressure Companies that appear “anti‐welfare” may publicly oppose UBI, but behind the scenes, the C‑suite understands that a guaranteed stipend prevents the societal collapse that drags down all private profit. Walmart’s long‐term survival (and its bond rating) depends on a consumer base that can at least buy bare‐minimum groceries. If 40 % of shoppers can’t pay, Walmart’s revenue evaporates faster than they can cut wages/suppliers. Macroeconomic Domino Effect Once major retail chains, restaurants, and service providers file for bankruptcy, the entire supply chain (manufacturers, logistics, wholesalers) also fails. That accelerates unemployment beyond 30 %–40 % → into 50 %+, making even utility companies insolvent unless Gov‑owned. 95 % Unemployment “Total Collapse” At ~ 95 % unemployment without UBI, the private‐sector economy essentially ceases. No major corporation—retail, tech, energy, pharma—can survive. Government‐run distribution (ration centers, emergency clinics) is the only “organization” left. -ai

Does Elon want to get arrested? Revealing classified documents is treason.

This guy is hilarious. But I have to criticize something he said because that's my job: 23:00 "…will some folks just take these drugs and not go to the gym? Absolutely, god bless them, whatever, we don't need them in the gym crowding up this shit. But at least now they're in way better health, way more muscle, way less fat. Our medical system saves billions of dollars and people are healthier and happier and look better. This is a big deal…" Why would gaining muscle and losing fat without exercise make you healthier?

@Leo Gura What about this angle: it's in company's best interest to have Universal basic income for everyone, because that's the only way these companies will stay alive. 95% unemployment without UBI also means -> 95% bankruptcy for every company. So Because company's are dependent on consumers -> Humanity might have a chance LMFAO Even the greedy Wallmart CEO will vote for UBI, the alternative is bankruptcy. The more robots replace jobs the less money Wallmart makes...

@Leo Gura As unemployment Rises, total taxable income for the government will fall, So eventually the government will basically go bankrupt as it has no income, and it will be forced to depends more and more on taxing companies. But of course this dependency only further gives companies more power over the government. I know it's naive but I don't think Elon, OpenAI and Google is going to allow everyone to starve to death. I think these people genuinely want to make a world of abundance. They just wont be able to build the uncorruptible systems we need. It is predictable that when Elon controls trillions of robots it is not that difficult of a task to solve world hunger. The effort and cost to do so is so low that it's a joke at that point.

All ai generated

@Leo Gura Most people are doing jobs they hate, a very small percentage of people <0.01% are doing meaningful fulfilling work, So I don't think unemployment is the problem for an AI take over. There is still plenty of things to enjoy and have fun in life, competition like chess is still fun even after AI solved it. The dream is fun... for people who don't have health problems. The real problem I think will be corruption as usual, People like Trump and Putin couldn't care less about a Utopia of abundance, they will corrupt and climb whatever ladder they can. There will be no Utopia. The only reason the government supports the quality of life of the average person is because those people are necessary to help support the power structure, the moment the average person is useless the people in power do not need them anymore. I think the biggest risk is the massive power imbalance. The government will not give companies less power.

For them to care about this logic they first need to acknowledge the differences between the sexes. They are blind to the differences in favor of values and ideals, so this idea you suggest looks like more inequality. In addition they will say we should apply the same logic to same sex sports, "if a man is taller he should have a 0.2 second penalty for every inch... (100m sprint) so everything is equal and fair. They want to eliminate all differences.

shhhhhhhhhhshhhhhh, don't say that outload, its propaganda 😉 You should also begin medical intervention right away by chugging 2 bottles of probiotics.

I had a debate on this topic that went nowhere. I made some really good points during my debate but it was completely dismissed as self-deception games. Vegans strongly believe science has proven as a fact that the vast majority of people can cut all animal products out and take a bunch of supplements as a replacement, and that all anecdotal outliers are 1/10,000 rare events. They will never acknowledge that science does not say any of this. The mindset is, if you have any problems while doing veganism you either have a rare health problem or you did it wrong. Nothing outside of that exists. No diversity exists in biology.

Sensationalism sells

This is true but it also reveals the limitations of Western psychology. They're not able to fit everything into a larger framework so they still keep these super broad terms and cast big Nets that basically lose all meaning. It's similar with the big five, it is one of the most useless models. What they have to do is dissect the Mind into many models and then view it from all these different perspectives at the same time and then incorporated it all into a larger framework. Most models are very limited in isolation.

That's why I'm starting a sports betting platform, we need conscious people to occupy the spaces of every business niche, to then funnel that welt to better things.

@Lucasxp64 and this is the worse its going to get.

Prompters watch the prompty suffer existentially while blinded to their own property origin

Law of Ego Repulsion “Two massive egos cannot coexist within a 20-meter radius without generating a destabilizing field of interpersonal conflict.”

@Aaron p don't worry I plan to remake the sequels with AI the moment the technology is ready lol Well call it "The Matrix Absolute Consciousness".

He's aging very fast. Twice as fast as a normal person.

@mariabudanova only Leo can change usernames @Leo Gura We can only ban your account we cannot delete it but you can hide your Journal if you want to.

Only fans

We Trust Google, Openai, and Elon Musk that they will all do the right thing when their companies Own 100% of the job market with AI robots.

So what you're thinking is there would be evidence that people taking B12 would get sick -> so because there's no evidence showing people getting sick -> there is no diversity trend. This is the problem with that logic: 1) Most nutrition RCTs are: • Small (<300 subjects) • Short (<2 y) • Focused on correcting deficiency, not on long-term health span outcomes (fractures, cognition, IBS, etc.). Hence slow-burn problems could be missed (Which is how every vegan reports getting sick). If a side-effect appears in 15 % of people after year 5, these studies are literally incapable of detecting it. Absence of evidence ≠ evidence of absence. 2) Single-marker tunnel vision Elevating serum B-12 is treated as “mission accomplished,” yet the body is an ecosystem: methyl-folate balance, homocysteine, iron status, gut microbiome shifts, and hundreds of downstream reactions are left unmeasured. Assuming that one corrected datapoint equals full health span is the same reductionism that plagues drug trials where an LDL drop is taken as proof of overall benefit. There are strong parallels between the logic that you're using and Pro-Pharmaceutical companies who have deceived and corrupted the epistemology of science. All of these companies are using the exact epistemic tricks to push their drugs into the general population. Masking long-term harm with "lack of evidence against it" and "single marker tunnel vision (LDL lower = good = 1 marker)".

I'm sure you feel this way about Leo in certain areas? What part of Leos body of work actually fits in your models?