LastThursday

My idea is different but the same: certain states of mind (consciousness) allow you to bend reality. In your case tripping may put you in that state. In my case it's a kind of "absentminded" state of being alert but not focused on anything. This is when the brain produces alpha waves. It's nearly like I can't force it because when I do, it breaks the state and it doesn't work.

It happens to me all the time. I'll find myself absentmindedly thinking about someone all day, and then bam! Before I realise, they contact me. It's so bad sometimes, that I force myself not to think too much about anyone in particular. Sometimes I like my peace.

Sure, PM me and let's discuss further.

You love doing nothing, and soon you'll love not doing nothing. At some point the scales will tip.

Da Vinci might be the archetype for polymathy, yes, but there are other ways to be a polymath. I just don't see that there has to be an a priori connection between IQ or talent and polymathy. We can all practise it if we want to, it's not an elitist activity. Like I said, people who are polymaths tend to be more intelligent precisely because they practise polymathy.

That's the real question. Reading faster won't get you there. What will get you there is contemplating death regularly, and using that to instill a focus and urgency about what you do want to spend your finite time reading and doing. Ask yourself, if I had one month to live, what would I be doing? If I had one week, then what? One day? And then go do those things, because those are the things you actually care about.

I wrote about it here, take from it what you will: TLDR: living a happy life is like good art, and you have to tap into your humanity. Happiness always starts with a choice.

Your message of understanding and accepting how others see the world is a great one to take on. My only quibble is that to know: you would have to step outside the dream. Until that happens, calling it all "a dream" has no practical or philosophical value (it isn't Truth) - other than to prime the mind into thinking it may be possible to step outside the dream. Calling reality a hallucination or delusion is disingenuous at best, and delusional itself at worst. This sort of talk may even encourage wreckless behaviour or a kind of mistrust of reality. This is everything, and that is absolute truth.

To sharpen my wits. As a source for ideas and things to think about. To stop myself going back to sleep. To gain insight about myself and others. To improve my writing skills. To connect, albeit in a very low effort way. To impart whatever wisdom I might have. To offload, open up and be brutally honest with myself. Distraction, stop boredom, nosiness etc. To make lists. What I try not to do: Get angry at the dickheads in the dating section. Get involved in meaningless to and fro. Virtue signal. Troll. Make lists.

That's good. You have to go beyond though. Resistance is not a thing, it's a process. For example in my case procrastination comes about because of rejection (i.e. the process of rejecting). I remember sitting in a chair probably less that two years old and my mum feeding me rice from a spoon. I remember becoming agited. My thought was: "Yes Mum I get it. Now I want to feed myself." But she kept on feeding me. Then I wanted get away, but I was trapped in my high chair. Most of the things I procrastinate about feel exactly like this. They are all things that other people impose on me - and I automatically want to reject it - and my only way of doing that is to do nothing. The above is just an example of the my process for procrastination. Your resistence is also a process and also probably tied to your past in different ways.

The world is heaven, hell and everything in between. There's physical hell, like poverty and hunger. There's mental hell like reliving past trauma or taking your thoughts as reality. When it comes to mental hell, there's a lot of things you can do to work towards heaven. If you live in mental heaven, then it becomes a lot easier to create physical heaven. But it works both ways, the physical and mental are strongly linked.

With defeatist thinking like that, you'll never be a polymath either. It's the other way round. Practising polymathy makes you more intelligent.

Interestingly, the Aquitani were situated where the Basque regions in Gallia and Hispania, sorry I mean France and Spain, are now. Thanks, I can't stop thinking about the Roman Empire now.

@DonaldJ welcome. You'll fit right in here.

Very good. But for a scientist that would explain nothing. Indeed if you're looking for any sort of answer, consciousness explains nothing at all.

We're all polymaths. It's just that the things most of us gain mastery in (walking, talking, socialising, surviving) don't seem like a big deal. We end up cherry picking what are "good" or "interesting" things to master and applaud people who can do more than one of those things. Mastery also doesn't have an end. So then it becomes a question of just how much mastery is acceptible to congratulate someone on. It's all concensus and fashion. The thing about polymathy is that each area of skill synergises with every other area and there's a multiplying effect. It's clear from someone like Da Vinci that he used all his skills together, not just each one separately.

Of course they're starting from the wrong place. Life didn't start with a cell, that's too complex. Life started with something far far simpler, and then evolution ramped up its complexity. Scientists just haven't worked out what that simple starting place is - and they may never work it out. But whatever it was, it was a self-sustaining chemical reaction that actively maintained itself; robust enough to survive its environment, that's all you need.

Sometimes thoughts bubble up and like a dream and if I don't get them down, they can be gone forever. The thought was about negative spaces or that's what I've labelled it as. The hole in a doughnut is a negative space, in that case the "negative" space is defined by the "positive" space around it - the body of the doughnut. There are a million more examples of this: the silent pause in a piece of music, the space created by the walls of a room. Ever more esoterically: the solidity created by a mime artist, the absence of a loved one, the structure of the atom, religion. There is a sense in which negative space as well as being defined by the positive space around it, is a kind of space of potentiality or possibility. Negative space is also about inference, on which the whole of science sits. Science deals with the positive space of experimentation and the "world out there" and conjures up the negative space of theorems and relationships. We also do science (with a small s) on a day-to-day basis. We're masters of dealing with negative spaces. We can so strongly believe in negative spaces that it's hard to even realise they are negative spaces, we make them our reality. For example, when we read a novel that is entirely made up of negative space, which we can get lost in. The space in a novel is negative because it is based on the positive space of real people and real places and words written on a page. A novel can't be understood without reference to the positive space of the world around us. In that way, the context of a negative space is always that of the positive space around it. You're looking at a negative space right now. This is not a person you're looking at, but pixelated glowing letters. But the illusion of negative space is strong. You attribute aliveness and agency to this negative space, by referencing the positive space of people and world around you - it is no different from the example of a novel. Where do people go when you're not looking at them, when they've gone away from you? They seamlessly slip from positive space into negative space. Their existence has to continue as they transition from one space to another. But the nature of their existence also changes from positive into negative space - we mostly choose to ignore this. Once someone has slipped into negative space, we must infer everything about them and conjure up a story of potentiality on their goings on and lives. Somehow negative spaces are fluid: the negative space of a room can be filled with many different things in many different configurations. Your inference of the negative space of @LastThursday is just this. I inhabit the positive space of Guillermo, but you in turn inhabit a negative space in my experience. So is negative space just projection? Projection, inference, science, gods, a good story, it's all the same. Is there an absolute positive ground for anything? I'd say yes, but it's impossible to get at this ground with the mind. The context for everything is always right there in front of you, that is the positive space, a unified unbroken whole. But all the rules and structure of reality create negative spaces in which we inhabit. Even the very walls of the room are made of negative space, defined in relation to other walls and our ideas of what a wall is and should do: is a window a wall? Should I prefer doughtnuts with holes in or jam? Hmm... To get at the positive space of me, read the above with this music:

Morning music

Electromagnetic radiation. The mind of God. Nothing at all. It varies.

DE·IMPERIO·ROMANO·NUMQUAM·COGITAVI

Sounds of laughter shades of life are ringing Through my open ears inciting and inviting me Limitless undying love which shines around me like a million suns It calls me on and on across the universe

You can't know what is uknowable. So everything is always known.

Excellent recommendation @Bazooka Jesus. Jesus is great, just a regular dude, with unregular powers. Episode 8 coming up...

Goodbye art. Putting the hay in the horse's mouth (spin an idiom why not?): Your gentleness became part of me, Your cheeriness my infection, Kiss kiss secret, became: Today's introspection. A hug, a blush, A funeral, And another, Your absence Forever is my absence. L. I'm so sorry.