RendHeaven

what do you mean by "value"

wear a glove.

glorious

I intellectually agree with you but can't seem to "get it" on a feeling level. Furthermore, I imagine that if by some miracle, I convince myself to find sexual attraction in all women indiscriminately, that will still all fly out the window the second someone conventionally attractive actually shows up in the flesh... even from mild states of no-self, on the level of sexuality I am biased (and this is perfectly fine). I also wonder, if all preferences are constructed, why stop at women? Why don't you fuck men or animals? And in fact, if we truly go meta, all sexual attraction at all is no different than any other desire, emotion, sensation, affinity, or inclination whatsoever. The idea of copulation dissolves into literal nothing. Weirdly, I'm more willing deconstruct "all the way" rather than to stop prematurely at imagining sexual preference to be unreal while maintaining that sexual attraction itself is still real.

As an individual, there's absolutely nothing wrong with diving deeper into "yourself' and foregoing the stupidity of mainstream shit. However, since you're additionally a content creator, there's definitely gonna be conflict there, as you're expected to deliver "value" to your audience. The good news is, your "value" proposition is up for you to decide. I'm personally thinking of becoming a content creator myself - every day I'm brainstorming ways to make this seemingly "boring" lifestyle you talk about appealing on video.

The word "cure" implies that something is "wrong" and ought to be fixed, and yet there is nothing "wrong" or in need of fixing regarding aging. To me, the idea of "curing aging" is just as absurd as "curing" breathing or walking or eating (or any other innocent, non-problematic thing )

This might be taboo in a community that leans towards ~natural healing~ but some good old modern chemicals helped me in my teenage years. Lotrimin obliterated my athlete's foot, it's never come back since then. No negative side effects, personally. So why not try it?

This language is misleading, as it seems to assume linear time (almost as though we're suggesting that one lifetime will give rise to another sequentially... this is nonsense). In some ways it's more truthful to say that you're living her right NOW, whatever that even means. But we're really stretching the human POV here in considering such things. When we realize The Cosmos, all human notions whatsoever literally vanish - i.e. sequence, perspective, etc.

?????????????????

lmfao

I see what you're saying, and yet still from higher perspectives, All is True and none is false. That really fucks with me

100% relate You've inspired me. I'll be joining the youtube grind soon <3

Haha wow story of my life. Esp. the bold

oof

Interesting, thanks for sharing

Lots. Of course not. No "intended communication" is EVER fully "taken onboard." Doesn't matter. Genuine sharing doesn't micromanage influence. You seem to have this attitude that insights aren't worth sharing unless they've achieved peak profundity, but that seems a lil' neurotic tbh. All refined teachings started somewhere. The expectation that people should withhold all insights until they've found a way to perfectly formulate it (if at all) comes off as resisting reality...

The Ultimate Truth. It's a shame that you can't share it with anyone on a social level since death is presumed "real" and "bad." But then again, there's nobody to even share this insight with anyway...

@4201

@Hardkill Sorry if my earlier comment was hurtful, I meant it as a playfully provocative wake-up call.

@4201 @Harlen Kelly You're both simultaneously right.

Being "good with women" vs being "bad with women" is the difference between women throwing themselves at you and saying things like "I love you," "lets hang out" vs being completely ignored or pushed away... maybe from certain perspectives, this distinction is "fake," but from other perspectives (mainly, the biased survival perspective of the typical hetero male) this distinction feels like life or death! Exactly. I'm advocating that dudes learn genuine charisma, not compensating charisma. I don't really make a distinction between charisma and lack of insecurity - these go hand in hand.

Just had my first needle hurty. It didn't hurt

You're right... at the same time though, I'd like to imagine that I at least have an *informed* assumption. Attracting straight women as a straight man is actually not rocket science(!!!), so even though we're all fundamentally assuming things about our dear Hardkill, I think we can still strongly point towards what needs work, without waffling in uncertainty. Maybe I'm naive but I sincerely believe that all guys can learn to "get good" with women because charisma is trainable & not static.

Just saying what needs to be said. The personality is clearly the problem, it's frankly a disservice that nobody has brought it up. You actually have to suck astronomically to not get women while "having the body of a fitness model"

lol yikes man your personality must really suck