-
Content count
65,340 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Posts posted by Leo Gura
-
-
8 hours ago, Breakingthewall said:that Israel is evil
Self-absorbed and unconscious.
The collective narcissism of Zionism.
-
4 minutes ago, Husseinisdoingfine said:I remember i was listening to Vaush, and he said something along the lines of;
" There are millions of people every year pouring across the border, okay, and? "
Yes, because leftists do not care about borders. And they think everyone should not care, not realizing that most people care a lot.
This is the self-absorbed narcissism of the left. It makes leftists blind to serious political realities.
Border enforcement is very important if you want to win elections.
-
@SimpleGuy Do not try to push water up hill. Instead align with water's flow. Move out of Russia and do good things.
-
35 minutes ago, enchanted said:Rise up the ranks as a Putin supporter and then somehow change the system from within.
No. That will never work, unless your plan is a coup.
-
That is correct.
One of the delusions of leftists.
Leftists are even worse than liberals on this point. Liberals at least want some enforcement. Leftist want zero enforcement and they don't see how this is a problem.
Frum is a smart conservative, despite his role in the Bush admin.
-
Ironically Ramaji's scale of 1000 misses the highest dimensions of Consciousness/God.
If you take his scale seriously you will not fully understand God.
Good luck getting him and his group-thinking orbiter monkeys to understand that.
-
13 minutes ago, OBEler said:My brother reads 1- 2 books a day for 35 years. That makes over 25.000 books.
What a load of BS.
-
Sorry, bro, but you picked like the worst life purpose in terms of reality.
If you really want to do that life purpose you should know that you basically doing a kamikaze mission.
I suggest you pick a more realistic life purpose, one that aligns with political reality better.
Your political goals needs to match the era and situation you were born into, rather than 100 years ahead of your time.
-
6000 books, Lol. There don't exist 2000 books worth reading.
-
The world would need to be very different just to have many people at Turquoise. That's like 200+ years away.
Imagine flying cars and shit.
-
Just be alone and enjoy it. Notice that nothing is wrong or missing.
You literally need no one and nothing.
There is a lot of culture programming you need to undo in order to realize you are just fine alone.
You are not going to overcome it without spending weeks and months all alone doing nothing. That's what solo meditation retreats are for.
Really Awakening is necessary because without Awakening you haven't conquered boredom. Awakening is about boredom killing the ego.
Realistically it will requires spending years sitting alone. This is not a small task you accomplish in a few weekends.
I can go months without talking to humans.
-
20 minutes ago, Daniel Balan said:I decided that until I become directly aware of what you are pointing at, I will continue to have my worldview
That is wise.
I get it. It is hard to endure all the shit I say if you haven't had a single mystical experience. I would sound insane.
It's like I am dancing and you are deaf.
Hang in there.
-
God is just Imagination. If you can imagine a self, the next logical step is to imagine an other. An other is just a self that isn't you. You can imagine that.
Without imagining others you would be lonely and bored. Other is also used to fool yourself into thinking you didn't create yourself but came from some "other".
Where did you come from? Either you created yourself or some other created you. To hide that you are God, you need to invent an other to offload the work to. You need to invent a mother and father to offload the responsibility for your creation.
Think of other as something which can be imagined. Which is why it exists.
You can imagine a kangaroo. You can imagine an other.
-
It's almost like a finger is pointing to a moon.
-
Since everything is the Self, all questioning is self-questioning.
So just deep questioning is the key.
-
-
23 minutes ago, Cubbage said:I'm curious what your thoughts are on Jacque Vallee's work if you have read any of it such as passport to magonia?
I know of him but I don't know his work enough to comment.
-
35 minutes ago, Daniel Balan said:You sound like my anti-vaxx, anti-semite, pro- Russian, fascist Nazi neighbour that almost hit me with a baseball bat when I told him that Russians are killing a lot of innocent people in the Ukraine war. He shouted at me: "Have you been to Ukraine and seen that there is a war? All this is western propaganda, Russians are good people, there is no war there."
This left me puzzled. From now on, whenever I want to make a statement about anything I must go take soil samples, photos, maybe travel back in time, to be able to form an accurate opinion on something?
I follow you solely for epistemology, but what kind of epistemology are you teaching me if you have the same rhetoric as my neighbour who has a portrait of Hitler in his living room?
I expected more!
I am teaching you serious epistemology.
The resemblance to your Nazi neighbor is superficial.
The point is that your mind holds gross double-standards and biases in is applications of proof, evidence, and reasons. You are unconscious of this double-standard so you take something like the existence of Napoleon as a fact but not UFOs, even though in fact the evidence for both are of the same kind.
99% of what you know is unverified hearsay. Yet you don't act like it and you criticize others for lack of verification in their worldview. That's the self-bias you're overlooking.
This is the topic of skepticism. Skepticism is badly misused by the ego-mind. I am always pointing out the double-standards and biases in the mind's application of skepticism. If you are going to be skeptical about UFOs then I get to use that same skepticism against everything you believe. When we do that you will see that your worldview cannot pass the test.
This UFO topic is precisely one of bad epistemology. But bad epistemology on the part of the normies, the UFO deniers. They deny UFOs on the basis of being careful, rigorous, and scientific, but in fact they are being sloppy, lazy, closedminded, and unscientific. Again, because people do not understand the epistemology of science properly. There is nothing unscientific about aliens visiting Earth.
-
34 minutes ago, Daniel Balan said:You mentioned the Napoleon invasion of Russia, for that we have in Russia many monuments, statues and artifacts in museums that clearly prove that Napoleon and his Grande Armée invaded Russia.
Have you been to Russia to see them?
Replace Napolean with a thousand other facts you believe but will never verify.
-
36 minutes ago, Joshe said:But the few dots I've seen you drop would not pass muster
That's why I am here and you are there.
-
@Nemra Now you understand why scientists are anal.
-
3 minutes ago, AION said:@Leo Guraso is your alien consciousness discovery linked to aliens we are seeing in the news or what? It is time to confess.
Not linked.
I have no direct experience of aliens from the news.
-
1 hour ago, Joshe said:Claiming a UFO was found in 1930s Italy isn't a "basic fact".
Many basic facts in your worldview are unverified by you. In fact, 99% of them.
Have you verified that Napoleon invaded Russia?
You haven't verified shit. Yet you act like you have.
Should you believe me about UFOs? Certainly not. Which is why I told you to educate yourself, not to believe me.
I never tell you to believe me.
People on this forum are so obviously not even informed of basic facts about UFO reports, like the fact that UFOs are reported in every country in the world. If you read the books you would know that.
I have shared many, many excellent UFO sources with you guys over the years. The best sources. Yet people are lazy and don't even study them. Then they act outraged over why I'm so confident on this matter, as if I just woke up one day and decided to believe in aliens. As in all of my work, I follow the facts wherever they take me and I do not care how crazy the conclusion sounds.
-
@Nemra I am saying that your methods are not rigorous enough.
How hard is it to weigh a consistent scoop? Not hard.

in Psychedelics
Posted · Edited by Leo Gura
Scoop measurements are relative to batch of substance. No problem.
Plus or minus 10mg is not large enough to matter for most chemicals.