Leo Gura

You're right. Of course it's not so simple. However, most people should experience some very mystical stuff on enough LSD. I struggle to understand how a person cannot.

Actually, it is. If you were truly conscious of the beauty of porn, you would cry. You do not understand what porn is. You're just wanking to it like a monkey on crack and then complaining.

Yeah, that's a big problem. But also keep in mind, once these corporations get their hands on AI tools, they could just use them to churn out the same old shit, just at lower cost to themselves. But these AI tools should empower smaller creators and small teams, helping them to compete with giant corporate budgets. This situation is very similar to what YouTube did for broadcasting. Now small creators have a chance to compete with the likes of CNN. I would love to create a video game. I know I could create a great one. But it's just so fucking expensive and time-consuming that it's impractical for me. And there's millions of people around the world who'd like to do the same but they never will because it's just too costly. Just think of all the amazing art we are not getting.

I predict that Adobe, Google, or Microsoft will buy all these guys out. This AI art tool needs to be seriously beefed up and scaled in order to reach its full potential. If I was an executive at Google I would invest a billion dollars into developing this thing.

No! Yes, there are millions of artists, but most of them suck. If you truly created great art you would not have any problem surviving. The issue is that great art is extremely difficult to get right. And it's not a problem of lack of technical drawing skills, it's a problem of vision, execution of that vision, and taste. The majority of films, video games, novels, songs, etc are bad art. As an example, a truly great video game comes out once every few years at best. There is an enormous market for such video games. The supply cannot meet the demand. If only such games were easy to make. If you make something amazing, people will flock to you and even adore you. But you cannot achieve this amazingness via narrow technical skill. It's important for you guys to grasp that art is primarily about vision. The rest is niggly details.

@Flyboy You make some good points, however, I have listened to McGilchirst and I'm well aware of his positions. I agree, he's an exceptional mind. I have his books on my bookshelf. But none of that reaches the levels that I am now exploring. I am way beyond science now and I deliberately make an effort now to throw away all human teachings. They just hold me back. I don't need any human models or explanations of myself. Hopefully some day you will reach this stage in your development.

Because you have not trained yourself for months to be a closer. After feeling the pain of losing 100 more girls even better than her, you will learn to close.

Porn increases my motivation, happiness, and life. Porn is amazing, and to not know how to appreciate it is a travesty to mankind.

No big deal. Learn to use it responsibly, Jesus, you guys.

@Jannes If you're taking LSD then you should be experiencing the things I'm talking about. How many times have you taken it?

Bailing hay is easy compared to running a corporation with 100,000 employees.

Oh no, it is you who is playing language games with me. You wish you were more truthful than a dog. You are a lying scoundrel.

LSD was the first time I realized I was God. So yeah... it's amazing.

https://www.actualized.org/insights/on-infinite-gods

It's enjoyable precisely because it isn't mentally stressful. You don't have to think, and thinking is hard work.

Soul isn't human, it's omnipresent in everything.

Endless new girls in the city.

Predicated? I had a sense of life purpose long before I knew who Aristotle was. That's like saying my sex drive is predicated on watching porn.

I call BS on that. Literally the same word.

People used to say that about chess. And now AI is better than any human will ever be at chess. Where did Michelangelo get all his art ideas? He stole them from the Bible. His mind was brainwashed with Christianity just like an AI fed various inputs and prompts. If Michelangelo was really creative he would have painted the Buddha. And if Buddhists were really creative they would have painted Jesus.

I think richer when I turn inwards and contemplate. Books are just a poor substitute for that.

If that happens, I will think it is a good idea. If AI replaced all of mankind, that's only gonna be possible if mankind was a net negative for the universe, in which case we all deserve to not exist. There is no reason why humanity should exist if we can be replaced by something superior in all ways. I have no problem with AI replacing mankind. As long as the AI is more truthful, more loving, more conscious, more intelligent. Which it would have to be in order to replace us. I don't care about loyalty to my species. I can about what is best for the universe.

I didn't say they were easy. I said they are less mentally stressful. Manual labor is extremely difficult and I believe people who do it should get paid a lot more. But this has nothing to do with the issue of this thread. Highly creative jobs and jobs with high responsibility tax the mind so much that it's basically impossible to awaken. That's why no CEO or scientist is awake.

Basically just means you're not meek.

Do you understand the concept of an analogy?