Leo Gura

It's possible if you're really wise. But since most people are fools, they will have to hit their own face against the brick wall to learn the lesson. And the biggest fools don't even learn the lesson then. They might hit their face against that brick wall 20 times and still not learn. Some people would rather die than learn their lesson.

Sure, it's better than watching YT all day long. Yes, of course there are benefits. Yes, it's valuable. As long as it doesn't turn into a cult.

That dude doesn't know what truth is. Truth is everything you experience: the raw being of reality.

It's not so simple. God can be infinitely conscious of itself, and the human is actually the obstacle to that. God's plan is itself. God is Love. And that is the plan.

Because the most serious people don't need to practice in a group. A group is designed for lazy sheeple. If a person was serious she would just sit down and become awake. The rest is games.

But he is still misrepresenting consciousness. It's easy to beat materialists in debates when you don't tell them that they are God, and God is Love.

Yes, it's crucial. Being a sheep doesn't work pretty well.

No conspiracy theories on this forum. How about you actually sit your ass down and do some consciousness work?

Death is imagined by consciousness. There is no Atman, only God/Brahman.

I don't dispute he helped many people. But when you practice spirituality like a monkey, there will be consequences. Most of Sadhguru's followers do not even know what enlightenment is conceptually, nevermind achieving it. It's yet another religion with all the classic problems. What do you think will become of that organization in 30 years after he dies? What horrors will it commit?

Not at all what my DMT trips are like.

@r0ckyreed Yes, you got it.

Consciousness doesn't leave the body. The body is consciousness. The body is emptiness. Yes it always works for me.

No But I've been to a Sadhguru event and his members are total sheep. They are just zombies. They don't think about spirituality for themselves at all and they worship him. It's pretty stupid. After he's dead it's gonna turn into just another religion/cult. Sadhguru does not teach his people to think critically, he just teaches them dogmatic techniques which they perform like monkeys.

@gar-4-field It dissolves in a few drops of vinegar and light coconut milk.

Why are you talking a substance if you don't trust what it is? You took 35mg of 5-MeO-DMT? And you are surprised it didn't feel good? At 35mg you're lucky you're not dead.

No conversion is necessary for plugging.

The road to hell is paved with good intentions.

He used recreational drugs. He was as pure as my ass crack. If I did 10% of the stuff Osho did, you guys would come for me with pitchforks.

Osho loved this cult and he encouraged them with his Roll Royces, diamond Rolexes, orgies, and the like. Don't even try to compare Osho's commune to Actualized.org. Not even in the same universe.

Locking this for fake Mahasamadhi video. Please double check before posting fake news.

A pure man would not allow such a cult to develop around him.

@Preety_India The only thing it entails is realizing what God is.

Watch your vulgar tone or you will be banned.

In the Absolute sense, nothing is higher or lower. But in a relative sense, things are higher and lower. Relative to survival and your personal well-being, you don't want to be QAnnon supporter. Being a QAnnon supporter is a problem relative to the QAnnon supporter's own worldview, because a QAnnon supporter's worldview holds that certain things are true and certain things are false. And one day the QAnnon supporter will discover that QAnnon violate his own standards of truth. It is not Leo who says QAnnon is false. It will the QAnnon supporter himself who will realize QAnnon is false. So the problem with QAnnon is that it is incoherent by its own standards -- it's just that the QAnnon fanatic hasn't realized it yet. When he realizes it, he will be in pain. Any perspective which is selfish, unconscious, hateful, and fear-based will ultimately be incoherent by its own standards. The only perspectives which are coherent are conscious, selfless, and loving ones. Now you could argue: "But what's wrong with having an incoherent perspective? It's that okay?" To which the answer is: it's okay so long as you're okay with the suffering that incoherence results in. If you are okay with anything no matter what, then there is literally nothing wrong with anything. But then you're also awake. So the problem is that you are definitely not okay with anything on matter what. You are triggered so easily. The perspective that you have two ass holes is not equally valid to the perspective that you have one ass hole. Because eventually you will have confront the reality that you only have one ass hole. So it does matter how truthful your perspective is. The less truthful your perspectives are, the more you will struggle and suffer. But if you are okay with massive struggle and suffering, then there is no problem. What you need to realize is that it is you yourself who is judging the results of your own perspectives. If you didn't judge your results, there would be no problems. But you judge your results very much, hence you literally create your own problems. A wrong perspective is not wrong because others say so. It is wrong by your own standards! For example, you might adopt the perspective that rape is good. But then when someone rapes your mother you will realize: rape is horrible. And thus you yourself will violate and condemn your own perspective. You will realize that your perspective was selfish and foolish. In this way you evolve. It is your own internal contradictions that lead to your ruin.