Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
Danioover9000

Daniel, John and Iain, on brain and meta crisis.

2 posts in this topic

   Really good talk, worth a watch as we have 1 systems thinker(Daniel Schmachtenberger), 1 pundit(John Vervaeke) and 1 intellectual who also realized no self(Iail McGilchrist), talking about tbe meta crisis in a debate format with Daniel Schmachtenberger in the middle. It's not arguing or debating, but good will, good faith dialogue between, not the shitty streamers style of talking:

   Many good lessons in terms of Spiral dynamics stages of development, cognitive and moral development, personality typing and traits by Myers Briggs and the Big Five personality traits modals, 9 stages of ego development by Jane Loevinger, Archetypes by Carl Jung, Integral Theory's other lines of development in life and societal domains, ideological differences and beliefs indoctrinated by culture and family upbringing, and information ecology and warfare.

   What are your thoughts on the Meta crisis?

   What are your thoughts on game heory, and game A and game B?

   Do toy like the video, and that setting? IMO nice fireplace setting, the wooden design, the marble and various shades or blue bricks, but boring looking monochrome black fireplace. Lovely lamps and window. Good tonality and body language, word choice. Good discussion setup with Daniel in middle, John on right and Iain on left, small coffee table between them and camera position opposite to Daniel but 1-2 metres away, nice carpeting and comfy armchairs. My impression is this is sub communication of aristocracy and upper class values, that this is a rich man's room with big brain individuals, but are wealthy in knowledge and worth.

   Whar do you think of the interview and discourse framing? I did a bit of body language analysis, verbal analysis, some discourse and statement analysis and overall good mood. Nit pick here is John Vervaeke and his bringing his hands together in a steeple, pointy fingers. Typically prayer positions with fingers out non-verbally shows power and aggression. Iain's pacing is slowest in comparison to Daniel and John. Reasonable good communication from Daniel, good emphasise on certain words and communicating good will, careful not to reframe, letting both men open statement and frame this meta crisis in their way. Also, Daniel's appearance of the white bushy beard, classic Wiseman look, simple t-shirt and pants, John Vervaeke wears more a confy suit, not business but ones that educated intellectuals wear, the good student wea, like what George W. Bush's opponent worn before the Iraq war, plus he's wearing glasses with thick black frames, again makes him look smarter and a boss. Iain McGilchrist wears similar but colours are coffee to cream light.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0