Mips

The fine line between enlightenment and mental instability

21 posts in this topic

18 minutes ago, Carl-Richard said:

So you conceded your entire point :) 

My point was that morality and solipsism are contradictory and can't co-exist together as they have fundamentally antithetical axioms that create dissonance. Morality is based on the belief that others are sure to exist, while solipsism is based on the belief that others are not sure to exist. Morality assumes fundamental guidelines for human behaviors and it assumes right and wrong (which can change and evolve). Solipsism doesn't assume any of that, because everything is relative and extremely fluid.

So, no. I did not concede my point. I only entertained a possibility where solipsism might look like morality without actually being it.


Foolish until proven other-wise ;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now