Majed

New realization about good looks.

31 posts in this topic

2 minutes ago, Natasha Tori Maru said:

A woman can become a status symbol that can be valued more highly than the material possessions which typically demonstrate a man's status. Often underneath wealth acquisition is this uncomfortable truth... many men do not want to admit this.

A woman's value can be reduced to what her presence communicates about the man. Using a woman's attractiveness for ones status is where the trouble lies. When she is used as a form of male status competition. 

Valuing a partners attractiveness isn't a problem as much as using the partner for status is.

@Natasha Tori Maru Yeah using a woman as as a status symbol and prestige is quite something interesting. Because if you haven't had the trauma of lack, you wouldn't appreciate the luxury of excess. 

You know like you cannot flex on someone who has more or like you. You can only flex on people who have less than you. And making it out of lack, is fucking beautiful. So i wouldn't say using women's attractiveness for prestige or status is inherently wrong. It can be legitimate and a sign of success over one's miserable start in life. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@Olaf Most girls i talk to are fairly low intelligence by in large. Same with guys. So if you're intelligent, which is quite common on this forum, then finding a girl that is intelligent in real life, is hugely attractive and perfect for long term compatiblity. It almost equals looks in importance. 

But the thing is intelligence is only attractive to intelligence, because like recognize like. Any fool can see beauty, only a wise man can see a woman rich in soul and wisdom. 

Edited by Majed

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, Majed said:

So i wouldn't say using women's attractiveness for prestige or status is inherently wrong. It can be legitimate and a sign of success over one's miserable start in life. 

It can be from the woman's perspective.

I wouldn't appreciate being used in such a way. I make it a point to avoid such men who play status games.


It is far easier to fool someone, than to convince them they have been fooled.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@Natasha Tori Maru You're clearly privileged for not seeing the beauty of making it out the hood. Lmao there's a reason why everyone talks about this stuff. It's real.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Majed said:

@Natasha Tori Maru You're clearly privileged for not seeing the beauty of making it out the hood. Lmao there's a reason why everyone talks about this stuff. It's real.

You have no idea where I came from, or how far I have come. You're assumptions are incorrect.

Edited by Natasha Tori Maru

It is far easier to fool someone, than to convince them they have been fooled.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@Natasha Tori Maru Relax shawty, just acted on instinct and told you what came to mind. Don't take it personal. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Majed said:

@Natasha Tori Maru Relax shawty, just acted on instinct and told you what came to mind. Don't take it personal. 

I am not angry or upset. 

I am correcting you.


It is far easier to fool someone, than to convince them they have been fooled.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

9 minutes ago, Majed said:

 Don't take it personal. 

You made a personal judgement about my background and privilege. Don't try to wiggle away from this.

Make no mistake, I am not perturbed here. But your interactions went from disagreement with me, to inferring I had some deficiency in understanding based on background. This is uncharitable.

 


It is far easier to fool someone, than to convince them they have been fooled.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Natasha Tori Maru said:

 

You made a personal judgement about my background and privilege. Don't try to wiggle away from this.

Make no mistake, I am not perturbed here. But your interactions went from disagreement with me, to inferring I had some deficiency in understanding based on background. This is uncharitable.

 

@Natasha Tori Maru Sure. Yeah, i don't know your background, i was making an assumption based on your speech. That's it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@Majed Do you think using a partner as a form of status hierarchy can be conformity? 


It is far easier to fool someone, than to convince them they have been fooled.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now