The Ontological argument is Sound.

[Ponder]

The ontological argument, put simply, is that”God must exist because in order for him to not exist, there has to be something of which can be imagined, but because god is the greatest conceivable being, it/he must exist in reality.

[Malkom]

cognitive distortion or hallucination

[Someone here]

Retarded argument . It assumes the conclusion. You should  first prove the existence of "the greatest conceivable being " instead of assuming there is a creature with this definition and then justifying your assumption. 

[Leo Gura]

Technically it is correct, but it is only convincing retrospectively, once you have become conscious of God.

The problem is you don't know if your logic corresponds to actual reality. But it turns out it does.

[Anonymous_2727]

On 12/5/2025 at 10:34 AM, Ponder said:

The ontological argument, put simply, is that”God must exist because in order for him to not exist, there has to be something of which can be imagined, but because god is the greatest conceivable being, it/he must exist in reality.

Awakening > Ontological Argument

[Ponder]

On 6/12/2025 at 5:16 PM, Leo Gura said:

Technically it is correct, but it is only convincing retrospectively, once you have become conscious of God.

The problem is you don't know if your logic corresponds to actual reality. But it turns out it does.

Yeah point taken. 

[Ponder]

11 hours ago, Anonymous_2727 said:

Awakening > Ontological Argument

I’ve awakened bro 

[Leo Gura]

God skull-fucking you > Ontological Argument

Edited Sunday at 08:35 AM by Leo Gura

[Nemra]

1 hour ago, Leo Gura said:

God skull-fucking you > Ontological Argument

Gosh, no one is ready for the skull-fucking! 

The greatest peek-a-boo.

Edited Sunday at 09:35 AM by Nemra

[Ponder]

4 hours ago, Nemra said:

Gosh, no one is ready for the skull-fucking! 

The greatest peek-a-boo.

Solipsism is a half-truth. 

[Nemra]

23 hours ago, Ponder said:

Solipsism is a half-truth. 

God is solipsistic. It must be, otherwise it's not God.

I'm not referring to being lonely as a human, which isn't loneliness in an absolute sense.

Edited yesterday at 01:47 PM by Nemra

[Elliott]

On 12/5/2025 at 10:34 AM, Ponder said:

The ontological argument, put simply, is that”God must exist because in order for him to not exist, there has to be something of which can be imagined, but because god is the greatest conceivable being, it/he must exist in reality.

The flying spaghetti monster must exist because in order for him to not exist, there has to be something of which can be imagined, but because flying spaghetti monster is the greatest conceivable being, it/he must exist in reality.

The flying spaghetti monster is everything, and everything IS the flying spaghetti monster.

 

Ufa must exist because in order for him to not exist, there has to be something of which can be imagined, but because Ufa is the greatest conceivable being, it/he must exist in reality.

 

Ufa is everything, and everything IS Ufa!

 

 

"Being", "onto-logical", is only within the concept of space and time.

Edited yesterday at 02:02 PM by Elliott