Why I'm Far-Right (and why I will never change)

[MightyMind]

@Elliott being anti-immigration would actually be a way to preserve ones culture, so I'm not sure why you say what you say. I think we're talking past each other and not getting what is being laid out.

 

 

Edited August 26 by MightyMind

[Elliott]

4 hours ago, MightyMind said:

@Elliott being anti-immigration would actually be a way to preserve ones culture, so I'm not sure why you say what you say. I think we're talking past each other and not getting what is being laid out.

 

 

You pointed out Austria for having an immigration issue right? But from what I understand, they've opposed immigration, they're one of the few E.U. countries that never allowed much immigration.

[Vinnie]

Just here because I'm inundated with stories on my feed of violent migrant crime on girls and women. Seeing videos of pre-teen girls being gang-stalked and having to carry their own bladed weapons now. It's disgusting. I don't understand why anyone would be for immigration. If you are, you're no man, but a spineless slug. Nothing is coincidence so this is intentional at some level. Whatever it is, they don't care about the collateral damage. I don't care about anything else past this issue. Protect your girls' fellas. Not European btw

[Elliott]

9 minutes ago, Vinnie said:

Just here because I'm inundated with stories on my feed of violent migrant crime on girls and women. Seeing videos of pre-teen girls being gang-stalked and having to carry their own bladed weapons now. It's disgusting. I don't understand why anyone would be for immigration. If you are, you're no man, but a spineless slug. Nothing is coincidence so this is intentional at some level. Whatever it is, they don't care about the collateral damage. I don't care about anything else past this issue. Protect your girls' fellas. Not European btw

https://policinginsight.com/feature/analysis/most-crime-has-fallen-by-90-in-30-years-so-why-does-the-public-think-its-increased/

"Most crime has fallen by 90% in 30 years - Policing Insight

As of 2024, violence, burglary and car crime have been declining for 30 years and by close to 90%, according to the Crime Survey for England and

so why does the public think it’s increased

There are many possible explanations for this, of which the first is poor information. A study published in 1998 found that “people who watch a lot of television or who read a lot of newspapers will be exposed to a steady diet of crime stories” that do not reflect official statistics.

All high-income countries have experienced similar trends, and there is scientific consensus that the decline in crime is a real phenomenon."

 

 

Edited August 27 by Elliott

[DocWatts]

Are there problems with the Left? Obviously.

They/we (for include myself when I speak of 'the left') can be inflexible, unrealistic, and developmentally blind. Fair enough.

No one is more aware of the blindspots of the Left than Leftists such as myself with little patience for performative bullshit (like holding your nose and refusing to vote for a candidate because they don't meet your purity test, when the opposition is a literal fascist).

That said, the solution to these shortcomings isn't to sprint 50 miles in the other direction to the opposite extreme.

Parroting far-right propaganda doesn't make you edgy - it shows that you're likely insecure in your identity and social status, and that you have a lot of inner work to do.

Edited August 27 by DocWatts

[MightyMind]

@Elliott there's been no shortage of footage of violence for years. Coming from foreigners on the indigenous of Europe. Your stats don't mean anything when little women are being violated in broad day light. You're gaslighting. "Don't see what you saw.", "it's rare" = sick. Meanwhile girls are being fucked with broken bottles, acid thrown on their face.

[MightyMind]

4 hours ago, Vinnie said:

Just here because I'm inundated with stories on my feed of violent migrant crime on girls and women. Seeing videos of pre-teen girls being gang-stalked and having to carry their own bladed weapons now. It's disgusting. I don't understand why anyone would be for immigration. If you are, you're no man, but a spineless slug. Nothing is coincidence so this is intentional at some level. Whatever it is, they don't care about the collateral damage. I don't care about anything else past this issue. Protect your girls' fellas. Not European btw

@Vinnie thank you for speaking up.

To all else reading this here are my thoughts.... It's disgusting what I've been seeing and it's shocking, the amount of footage, news reports and anecdotal, and to have people down play or dismiss these realities. It's as if they've been psychologically manipulated and primed to, in their own way, to impede the facing of this reality. Usually it requires them to get gang banged, continuously, for hours or days, and they clue in to what some of are warning of - this is happening, wake up people. And it's being assisted by the UN's replacement migration ideas https://www.un.org/development/desa/pd/sites/www.un.org.development.desa.pd/files/unpd-egm_200010_un_2001_replacementmigration.pdf

Read the above pdf and you'll see, that in 2000, they were worried about population decline. Instead of creating incentives for the indigenous population to repopulate they insisted you import other cultures with other value systems and world views. That's how you dissolve a culture, it does not strengthen it, it eradicates it and in turn a new culture will be formed.

Do you like be a part of a social engineering experiment? Told to just accept it. "It's for your betterment"....

Or are you a creator? Or are is it your destiny to be a pawn, to be shaped and molded, a good little boy?
 

Edited August 27 by MightyMind

[ryoko]

Look, the problem is not just you. Anyone who is forced to prioritize a country and it's people is just symptoms of a bad structure. The notion of countries are pointless, but someone/groups profits from it. A century ago, colonization was the evil, the evil of this century is the existence of countries, and the existence of inefficient mediums like money. 

[MightyMind]

@ryoko nah, the evil is ignorance and action guided by it. Money is a tool, but usury is sickness, profit off of debt = sickness. Countries led by good people don't promote such bad ideas, they eradicate it and our countries are not led by such good people and so to blame "countries" or money, this is ignorance ;P and I say this with love and appreciation for engaging so thank you

[ryoko]

you're still locked in the context. get out! 

[ryoko]

Perhaps I can explain in a more sensible way. Imagine slavery, but they take good care of you, you get time for rest, holidays, you get spending rights, a shelter, a partner. But it's still slavery, just made more efficient and irresistible. The only way to get rid of it, is by uprooting it from the lowest level possible. Of course how it happens is subject to debate, but let's not beat around the bush. 

It's like having a bad OS and you're trying to fix it by writing binaries to solve specific problems which shouldn't exist in the first place, it will patch it to some extent, and even have a good time if there's no evolution, but that's not the case. So, all these attempts at fixing a broken structure is futile. It's a temporary solution, a patch. Nobody is even seeing the real problem. It's not some new age concept which no human had ever thought of before. But, many things simply won't happen because it's not "profitable". The solution is not to find ways to bring about profit. The solution is to uproot the system which have profit as a requirement. 

Edited August 27 by ryoko

[MightyMind]

@ryoko elaborate on what you think is the real problem ("countries" and "money")

And what's a remedy, alternative?

Edited August 27 by MightyMind

[Elliott]

1 hour ago, MightyMind said:

@Elliott there's been no shortage of footage of violence for years. Coming from foreigners on the indigenous of Europe. Your stats don't mean anything when little women are being violated in broad day light. You're gaslighting. "Don't see what you saw.", "it's rare" = sick. Meanwhile girls are being fucked with broken bottles, acid thrown on their face.

By your logic we should deport natives too, there's no shortage of footage of native Europeans violating women. It's an idiotic statement. Crime is down 90%, Europe is safer, immigrants commit fewer crimes than natives. 

The coming economic depression from population decline will cause crime to skyrocket, you are advocating for the rape and assault of women.

 

 

 

Edited August 27 by Elliott

[ryoko]

The world is an unequal place, resource allocation is stagnant and perverted. This invariably creates issues, scarcity drives people to crimes, distorts their sense of survival into something ugly. It's not a problem which is seeking some hotfix, it's the symptom of the very system's existence, it's the hidden cost, a hidden requirement for it to keep functioning. These problems are not something we should tackle morally, human beings cannot empathize. The solution is to design efficient system so that we do not create scenarios for those problems to occur, our systems are simply inefficient to carry us further, it may be better than previous iteration, but not good enough. 

And the worse part? The systems in place are normalized and taken for granted, even thoughts like this are seen as some alien bullshit. Because to observe it, you need some distance. Here's the deal, the system in place will make sure nobody will have that breathing room to see it, even if they can see it clearly, the system has been made immutable by design. I don't think we humans are capable of true empathy. If we were truly empathizing with victims of war, starvation, poverty, we wouldn't be operate functionally, so we let it recede into the background, that's just how human beings can operate optimally. I think we don't need to be empathizing with those who are at in those scenarios, that's doing nothing. The first step would be to evolve enough to see, this damage is self damage. Your potential for causing others harm is the extent of how much self damage you can tolerate. 

[MightyMind]

@Elliott see the ongoing footage and you'll realize your stats, which can be manipulated, mean nothing

[Elliott]

4 minutes ago, MightyMind said:

@Elliott see the ongoing footage and you'll realize your stats, which can be manipulated, mean nothing

Footage is anecdotal, you know that right? One incident out of 800 million people. Jail then deport the criminals.

 

https://www.dw.com/en/immigration-has-not-raised-german-crime-rate/a-71691228

Immigration has not raised German crime rate - DW

Feb 20, 2025 · A new study by a top German economic policy institute has confirmed the academic consensus: There is no correlation between increased migration and a rise in crime — despite the political debate

Edited August 27 by Elliott

[MightyMind]

12 minutes ago, Elliott said:

Footage is anecdotal, you know that right? One incident out of 800 million people. Jail then deport the criminals.

 

https://www.dw.com/en/immigration-has-not-raised-german-crime-rate/a-71691228

Immigration has not raised German crime rate - DW

Feb 20, 2025 · A new study by a top German economic policy institute has confirmed the academic consensus: There is no correlation between increased migration and a rise in crime — despite the political debate

footage that shows violence on young children is real but you call it anecdotal. "Oh, but it's just a small number"...you aren't seeing what I'm seeing meanwhile you speak to charts and numbers, all of which can be classified in ways that can be manipulated. 

[Elliott]

3 minutes ago, MightyMind said:

footage that shows violence on young children is real but you call it anecdotal. "Oh, but it's just a small number"...you aren't seeing what I'm seeing meanwhile you speak to charts and numbers, all of which can be classified in ways that can be manipulated. 

Anecdotal means real.... do you think native Europeans don't harm women and children? They're safer with immigrants, actually.

[MightyMind]

@ryoko

27 minutes ago, ryoko said:

The world is an unequal place, resource allocation is stagnant and perverted. This invariably creates issues, scarcity drives people to crimes, distorts their sense of survival into something ugly. It's not a problem which is seeking some hotfix, it's the symptom of the very system's existence, it's the hidden cost, a hidden requirement for it to keep functioning. These problems are not something we should tackle morally, human beings cannot empathize. The solution is to design efficient system so that we do not create scenarios for those problems to occur, our systems are simply inefficient to carry us further, it may be better than previous iteration, but not good enough. 

And the worse part? The systems in place are normalized and taken for granted, even thoughts like this are seen as some alien bullshit. Because to observe it, you need some distance. Here's the deal, the system in place will make sure nobody will have that breathing room to see it, even if they can see it clearly, the system has been made immutable by design. I don't think we humans are capable of true empathy. If we were truly empathizing with victims of war, starvation, poverty, we wouldn't be operate functionally, so we let it recede into the background, that's just how human beings can operate optimally. I think we don't need to be empathizing with those who are at in those scenarios, that's doing nothing. The first step would be to evolve enough to see, this damage is self damage. Your potential for causing others harm is the extent of how much self damage you can tolerate. 

A thoughtful response, thank you. 

"The world is an unequal place, resource allocation is stagnant and perverted." - I would suggest resource allocation is perverted and corrupted, because it's designed that way by a small few who like to profit and monopolize and so in turn it's formed to benefit them. It doesn't have to be organized conspiracy for this play out, but rather just a small few who are effective at what they do and they work together because they have more in common with each other than they do the common person. Without rail guards in place that minimize it then you have the system you so speak of. = "This invariably creates issues, scarcity drives people to crimes, distorts their sense of survival into something ugly. It's not a problem which is seeking some hotfix, it's the symptom of the very system's existence"....and yet the system's current form is because of the vampiristic behaviour of a small few who work in a way, as you suggested, that makes it nearly impossible for the crowd to recognize it ("the system in place will make sure nobody will have that breathing room to see it")

 

[ryoko]

1 minute ago, MightyMind said:

Without rail guards in place

you missed the whole point. 
guardrails = patch work
better systems = architecture which is "actually" better

What do I mean by that?
Think about it like this, "if we build this system, how worse can we game it?" , and go from there. When we were building Capitalism and currency by sheer accidental iteration of what was before, did we take into account the human nature of greed? The question is laughable. Human beings will optimize for what's the path of least resistance when it comes to large groups. So, the way Capitalism is meant to be played is by being greedy and hoarding as much as possible. That's the most likely path, if you now start to impose morals into this and start talking about oh it's immoral, you're just building obstacles for yourself.