Revealing one of my secrets towards higher development and intelligence

[Davino]

12 hours ago, Lyubov said:

Thanks for that reply ChatGPT

And the problem is?

I usually quote it but I could have copy pasted it from Wikipedia as well. I don't get why suddenly if it's from AI it is looked down, just remove that barrier from the mind and appreciate that it's a better summary than what I could have ever done and it adds value. I had a long conversation with GPT -o1 and told it give a summary in the end for you.

Otherwise, what is your original question. Is it him? Yes it is. I was trying to give more context...

[Carl-Richard]

21 hours ago, Davino said:

It has been used in many other fields like spirituality and learning but it seemed to click a lot with my mind's ability to connect. Psychedelics just brought it to the next level. Take LSD and or 5meo and go over the document it will flod your mind with insights, it feels like getting hit with a baseball bat in a part of the brain you didn't even know existed.

For me it is indifferent, the picture is self-contained. It's a manifestation in its own right so to speak.

People like Sadhguru can look you in the eyes and "know your past, present and future". Once your perception is strong enough, you can download the karmic footprint of a person or object from the subtlest of sources.

I guessed my mom's fiance had something traumatic happen to him in the past the first time I met him, because he could just never sit still or look me in the eye; probably a close relative dying early. The same day, my mom told me his dad died in front of him when he was 12.

Edited January 9 by Carl-Richard

[integration journey]

I resonated with this thread and finally printed out my list of people who I admire who had the most impact on me in the last 10 years. 
I could have added more though. 

Edited April 15 by integration journey

[Nilsi]

On 8.1.2025 at 9:39 PM, Davino said:

Yep

Henry Kissinger reshaped U.S. foreign policy by orchestrating the historic opening to China, forging arms-control agreements with the Soviet Union, and negotiating the Paris Peace Accords to end direct American involvement in the Vietnam War—efforts that contributed to him being awarded the Nobel Peace Prize. He also influenced events in Latin America, notably supporting Chile’s Pinochet regime, and oversaw controversial actions in Southeast Asia during the Cold War. Despite moral criticisms, his Realpolitik (national interests and pragmatic power over ideology) efficient approach and ability to shift alliances remain widely studied, highlighting both the strategic brilliance and ethical complexities at the heart of high-stakes statecraft—such is the nature of diplomacy.

Yeah, and you conveniently forgot the part where he consciously destabilized the entire Arab world, not as some unfortunate consequence of diplomacy but as deliberate imperial design. He fractured Arab solidarity, propped up reactionary regimes, and turned the region into a managed theater for U.S. oil and arms interests. That’s not “realism” - it’s the strategic dismantling of collective autonomy for the sake of empire.

And as if that weren’t enough, let’s talk about Chile: Kissinger backed a brutal military coup against Salvador Allende, a democratically elected socialist whose only “crime” was representing the interests of his people over those of U.S. capital. What followed was a reign of terror under Pinochet, complete with torture, disappearances, and a neoliberal shock therapy experiment. That wasn’t diplomacy. That was ideological warfare cloaked as pragmatism.

But the most obscene part is how he’s remembered for “ending” the Vietnam War. In reality, Kissinger escalated it:

He authorized the secret bombing of Cambodia and Laos, killing hundreds of thousands and helping unleash the Khmer Rouge genocide.

He delayed peace negotiations to secure a “decent interval” for U.S. exit, knowingly prolonging death and destruction to save face.

He helped architect a regional collapse whose effects still echo today.

And somehow this is what earns a Nobel Peace Prize?

This legacy isn’t one of “strategic brilliance.” It’s one of instrumentalized cruelty - realpolitik stripped of ethics, human cost dismissed as collateral. Kissinger didn’t master diplomacy; he reduced it to pure power calculus, and in doing so disfigured the very idea of peace into a euphemism for control.

[Nilsi]

7 minutes ago, Nilsi said:

Yeah, and you conveniently forgot the part where he consciously destabilized the entire Arab world, not as some unfortunate consequence of diplomacy but as deliberate imperial design. He fractured Arab solidarity, propped up reactionary regimes, and turned the region into a managed theater for U.S. oil and arms interests. That’s not “realism” - it’s the strategic dismantling of collective autonomy for the sake of empire.

And as if that weren’t enough, let’s talk about Chile: Kissinger backed a brutal military coup against Salvador Allende, a democratically elected socialist whose only “crime” was representing the interests of his people over those of U.S. capital. What followed was a reign of terror under Pinochet, complete with torture, disappearances, and a neoliberal shock therapy experiment. That wasn’t diplomacy. That was ideological warfare cloaked as pragmatism.

But the most obscene part is how he’s remembered for “ending” the Vietnam War. In reality, Kissinger escalated it:

He authorized the secret bombing of Cambodia and Laos, killing hundreds of thousands and helping unleash the Khmer Rouge genocide.

He delayed peace negotiations to secure a “decent interval” for U.S. exit, knowingly prolonging death and destruction to save face.

He helped architect a regional collapse whose effects still echo today.

And somehow this is what earns a Nobel Peace Prize?

This legacy isn’t one of “strategic brilliance.” It’s one of instrumentalized cruelty - realpolitik stripped of ethics, human cost dismissed as collateral. Kissinger didn’t master diplomacy; he reduced it to pure power calculus, and in doing so disfigured the very idea of peace into a euphemism for control.

If you want to talk about realism with dignity, you should be putting up a picture of Salvador Allende - not Kissinger. Because if anything embodied enlightened realism, it was Allende’s project: a democratic, sovereign path to socialism, rooted in the real material needs of his people, not the paranoid abstractions of empire.

And by the way, these were Allende’s final words, spoken over live radio as Kissinger-backed tanks shelled his presidential palace and the military - armed and emboldened by U.S. support - closed in to crush Chilean democracy:

“I will not resign… I will pay for loyalty to the people with my life.”

He didn’t “fall” - he was murdered, alongside the hope for a more just Latin America.

That’s what your so-called diplomacy accomplished.

That’s the real face of “strategic brilliance.”

[Nilsi]

9 minutes ago, Nilsi said:

If you want to talk about realism with dignity, you should be putting up a picture of Salvador Allende - not Kissinger. Because if anything embodied enlightened realism, it was Allende’s project: a democratic, sovereign path to socialism, rooted in the real material needs of his people, not the paranoid abstractions of empire.

And by the way, these were Allende’s final words, spoken over live radio as Kissinger-backed tanks shelled his presidential palace and the military - armed and emboldened by U.S. support - closed in to crush Chilean democracy:

“I will not resign… I will pay for loyalty to the people with my life.”

He didn’t “fall” - he was murdered, alongside the hope for a more just Latin America.

That’s what your so-called diplomacy accomplished.

That’s the real face of “strategic brilliance.”

Also, for you Spiral Dynamics nerds: this wasn’t some “mean green” socialism. It was a collaboration between the Chilean government and the era’s most advanced systems thinkers and cybernetic theorists.

You’d be hard-pressed to find a more genuinely "Tier 2" political experiment.