Technology Vs Climate Change Deniers

[Wyatt]

For the benefit of the skeptics, let's say that all of the science supporting global warming and climate change is wrong or unreliable, and burning fossil fuels/coal has no effect on the climate. As far as we know, fossil fuels are a finite material so we will run out of them at some point. I don't see what's wrong with wanting to construct and employ energy converting technology that utilize almost infinite energy sources (solar, thermal, wind, water, etc.).

Can someone explain this shit?

[Radical Honesty]

@Wyatt This is true. But some would argue that it's not worth lowering productiveness by limiting fossil fuel consumption now, when we will be able to exploit technological advances in renewables in the future anyway.  

[Evilwave Heddy]

Technology is more expensive for the consumers.  Also those type of consumers still believe that fossil fuels are infinite or don't see the point of switching now as they'll be dead in a number of years so won't affect them.

[Nahm]

Inevitable.