Loveeee

Counter-arguments to the fine-tuning argument ?

3 posts in this topic

From a materialistic point of view 


No space, no time, nothing but you/this/here/now

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No.

The universe is extremely ordered and fine tuned to contain life . If the  earth was a little bit nearer to the sun it would burn ..if the earth was a little bit further away from the sun it would freeze. 

The cosmological constant. The gravitational constant.  All the laws of physics basically.. According to Stephen Hawking if they were slightly different during the big bang we would not have life and intelligent species like human beings .

All of that makes atheism a joke .


“God is the Alpha Omega .. the beginning-less  beginning and the endless end . 
He is the first without start . He is the last without end . He is the manifest actuality ..nothing covers him . He is the most hidden essence  ..nothing can grasp him .. nothing below him or more subtle than him .The ego is the belief I’m separate from god . Because being god is too good to be true .No matter how dark it gets or difficult it gets ..no matter how long it is going to take .. my destiny is the infinite happiness and infinite joy and love as the best thing ever ..God .  “

-that’s a me .

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@Loveeee

11 hours ago, Loveeee said:

From a materialistic point of view 

   Could you explain to me what fine tuning is in it's definition? Also what is the argument and resolution that frames this pro versus con fine tuning debate? What is the conflict of interest here?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now