Carl-Richard

I'm not an expert, but from what I can remember with my limited background in chemistry, nitrates tend to be very explosive in general.

This video was made before the information about ammonium nitrate was released.

Why not both?

80s proto-rap rock song criticizing religious Blue and American expansionism from worldcentric high-Orange: "Whoever we are Wherever we're from We shoulda noticed by now Our behavior is dumb And if our chances Expect to improve It's gonna take a lot more Than tryin' to remove The other race Or the other whatever From the face Of the planet altogether"

There is validity to the idea that it can be very destablizing and intense, but that is exactly arguing in favor of the fact that it's a vastly different experience than what your brain is used to and that it's not reducible to mere "receptors". Every chemical has an unique signature, and it is not something you can replicate out of thin air. You're not in the neuropharmacological driver's seat in terms of your own endogenous chemicals.

I think one type of a stage turquiose game would be something you could only log on inside the DMT realm. You've probably heard about close friends (they're on the same "wavelength") having had the same type of experience and having encountered the same beings inside their trip. Essentially, that is the concept of how to access the same game interface in the hyperdimensional space: the DMT space allows for shared out-of-body experiences. Before the trip, you would have to spend a certain amount of time linking your mind to the correct wavelength by doing a certain sequence of meditation and visualization practices. It's the computer equivalent of booting up and starting the correct software. When your mind is adequately synchronized, you will be given the entrance password telepathically by the hyperdimensional aliens who've designed the game, and you're then free to smoke your DMT and enter the realm where you can interact with your friends in an infinitude of unimaginable ways

I remember asking my mom "Why do we have to die?" when I was like 7 years old, and she got really stumped by that question haha.

The argument ignores many nuances, like the different combinations of receptors and unique patterns of activation of each substance, the intensity of the activation relative to the rest of the brain, that it creates a drastic disequilibrium in the chemical environment etc.. It's really just a clever form for reductionism. You can't really say anything else than that it changes brain activity in a very specific way. You can use the analogy of software vs. hardware. The "it's just receptors" argument is essentially like saying that there is no point in installing different types of software on your computer, because you can just produce the software yourself from scratch. It's a bit... lets say optimistic. The hypothesis that McKenna got his brain tumor from psychedelics is also highly questionable. He took psychedelics very infrequently (around half a year between each trip).

Sounds more like the god of monotheistic stage blue

Scale, intensity, and reasoning.

OSRS anyone?

That's a cage cat

I've been trying to make my friends more interested in green. I want them to reach yellow in their lifetimes.

Try unconditional love some time, my friend. It's much sweeter

Love is enough.

That is a redundant statement. It's like saying all squares are squares. You don't understand the "absoluteness" of relativity

Leo recommended this movie in his new video about stage red: I watched it just now. It's very good

Japan's handling of Covid-19 summarized in a 2 minute video

His eyes are legit scary

JP considers himself extremely extroverted, so I don't know about that one

That's theoretically possible, more so for red than any other stage, but what is the probability that only one person has developed a completely new stage and becomes the leader? Astronomically low. A new stage also evolves gradually over time, not just through a single generation, and by that time, the values have had time to spread throughout the society, especially on the scale of a single tribe. Yes, implementing values into society takes time, but I don't think it takes more time than evolving to a completely new stage. Those are two vastly different time scales. Evolution is generational, and politics is situational.

Ok, let's stick with purple. There was a time in history where purple tribal societies started started to turn into red tribal empires, and something must have caused that shift. How would you explain this evolution? More generally, how can the individuals of a society not somehow impact the structures of that society? Afterall, the society is just a collective of individuals.

@cobalto You shouldn't use substances like these for symptomatic relief. You're supposed to use them for dissolving the root causes of your issues.

The democratic process is one example. If the majority of the people are in favor of blue values, then they will vote for the blue candidate, and the society then becomes more blue.