Carl-Richard

I did as I was starting out. Body scanning from toes to head, then following the breath. Then I tried the do nothing for a while, then third eye meditation, and later ended up with a mixed technique.

@AtheisticNonduality Cool guy, right? I challenge @thisintegrated to find any logical inconsistencies in his worldview. See if logic protects you from cults

If you haven't tried going 1 hour straight before, try it

In what way though? Like specifically.

Why?

It's very bad optics. I wouldn't recommend it. MrGirl just doesn't care.

Vaush's decision to end the debate wasn't because of the idea that joking about pedophilia is morally inexcusable. It was because of the inference that MrGirl is a pedophile. But that's just MrGirl. He talks as honestly as possible without virtue signalling, even if that makes him get labelled as a pedophile or get booted off panels or entire platforms.

What does that have to do with conservatism?

How does he get more conservative?

Exactly.

Liberal who thinks for himself.

I don't think he said the last four of those.

Yes. Google doesn't answer questions. It gives you websites. It's more like Quora.

You could test it out. Just make sure it's structured and you're actually using a timer. I found that most of my meditation gains would occur at the 45 minute mark, also at the point of the day where I'm the most alert (the window before or after dinner where my stomach is not too full or not too empty). My experience is that meditation is like an unwinding of tension, and that if you interrupt the process, the tension quickly starts building up again. So if you want to go deep, it's in a sense quality over quantity. You want to go all in for each session and see how far you can go, not spend progressively longer time in half-assed states.

Apparently, OpenAI is a blockheaded materialist who doesn't understand metaphysics. It literally doesn't understand what it's talking about : I'm going to stop with the AI posts for now

Oh, the big one:

It's well-read

That could be possible, but then they can't have their own journal in that section, but you could solve that by giving the ajournalistic people their own journal section.

Member Ajournalistic?

Hmmmm. It doesn't like very specific probability questions I tried prodding it, but it wouldn't budge. "I'm just a sowwy little robot "

?

I've been looking for this for a good while. It's actually useful Much more efficient than manually scanning Google Scholar.

Shut up

Science is: a method ("the hypothetico-deductive method"): falsifying hypotheses by doing experiments/observations and interpreting data. a field of study: a set of paradigms, methodologies, theories, hypotheses, methods, measurements, conclusions, predictions, explanations, descriptions. A "logical understanding" applies to many fields of study: scientific, philosophical, spiritual, personal.