Hardkill

What happens if they are not selective with whom they are dating? Why is it harder for guys to get dates than it is for girls?

Ok I get that why they have to be more selective with sex, but why do they have to be more selective than men with going out on just going on a date or just giving a guy a phone number? A woman used to put up with enforced monogamy even if the man they are going to marry was the only guy they ever met in their whole life. Btw, how come a lot of girls end up having casual sex if they get very attached after sex?

It was only matter of time before he would die soon.

Here's an experiment of a guy who asked 100 random girls for their phone numbers and only got 5 girls to give their numbers to him: Yet, here's a video of a girl who asked 100 random guys for their numbers and about half of them gave their numbers to her. Don't tell me that's not a massive difference. And why don't women approach as much as men do? Wasn't feminism supposed to give women as much equal opportunity as men have with everything in the world?

That's not a practical strategy. A man rarely ever get Real IOIs, regardless of how attractive he is.

If conservatives tend to be more pragmatic, more fiscally responsible, more disciplined, and more successful than liberals are when it comes to doing a job, running a business, managing finances, etc. then why have conservatives in power in the US such as Trump almost always have made the economic worse if not much worse than it was before they entered into office? On the other hand, why have liberals in power such as FDR almost always made the economy so much better for the entire country than it was before they entered into office?

Interesting. I never thought you would say that Reaganomics had any positives. Yeah, the increase in the amount of free-trade and globalization of the economic did cause stores to sell products at a significantly cheaper rate. However, top economists on from both the left-wing and the center say that Reaganomics failed miserably. The major tax cuts passed by Reagan, Bush, and Trump didn't really do jack squat to boost the economy in any significant way. As you know, the fat cats at the top have been keep way too much of the wealth for themselves. We also know that decades of deregulation of the economy lead to banking crises in the 80s, 2008 financial crisis, and another kind of banking crisis this year. Furthermore, we don't need to go over how the influence of Reaganomics has destroyed labor unions over the past four decades, has continually increased economic inequality, increase in the excessive amount of monopolies, lead to greater amounts of corporate lobbying, more inside trading, and so on and so forth. Milton Friedman and all of those Chicago School economists were big fools. The only reason Reagan was perceived by most Americans in the 80s as having done such an amazing job of managing the economy was really because he actually inherited an economy that was already on its way out of the terrible period of stagflation and the early 80s recession. The Federal Reserve, under the leadership of Paul Volcker, during the early 80s was the one who finally saved the country from stagflation and then gradually got it out of the Volcker shock recession afterwards. I hope that Bidenomics really succeeds in causing the beginning of the end of neoliberalism.

Up to a certain point. Otherwise, Reaganomics would've worked in the long-run.

The utter hypocrisy..... Yes, conservatism is about maintaining the status quo, but why does that have to lead to a tendency to serve those in power? Why can't maintaining the status quo more often mean that you govern your society as a leader who exudes qualities of high-integrity according to traditional societal norms and religion?

Democrats in power have almost always caused much greater net job gains than Republicans have. The policies of Republicans have usually caused historic recessions. Also, Democrats do some kind of tax increase on the rich and corporations whereas Republicans do major tax cuts for their wealthy donors and corporations. Yes, both Democrats and Republicans have neglected the working-class for way too long. However, you can't say that Democrats haven't significantly improved the quality of the economy overall. Obamacare greatly improved the entire country's healthcare system. Biden and the Democrats last year were finally able to get Medicare to start to negotiate prescription drug prices and have passed laws that have been creating several million good paying jobs for the working class, while most Republicans in Congress opposed all of those measures. I can say more about how Democrats have always been significantly better for the economy than Republicans.

Right, but it's not just that. Conservatives' policies in the US have led to the worst recessions in US history including the Great Depression and the 2008 financial crises and so on. Their deregulation policies have cause several banking crises, housing market bubbles, more inside trading, and destabilize many other parts of the US economy. Furthermore, their tax cuts and excess spending on military warfare that cause ballooning deficits and have never helped out any one other than rich and corporations. Actually, the recessions they have caused have caused the rich and corporations to lose so much of their own money in the long-run. You've talked before about how conservative values include being responsible, dutiful, practical, getting your house in order, managing finances well, success, and having a strong and well functioning economy, preserving the survival of your society, and successful. Yet, why have conservatives virtually all the time have been so incompetent, irresponsible, and disastrous with managing the economy?

How many more weird alternative candidates will we keep getting and how much of a problem will this be for Biden and the Democrats in 2024?

Will several millions of people on Earth inevitably die from this climate change crisis? Progressives are very upset with establishment Dems for not seriously tackling this issue many years ago.

If all drugs became legalized, then wouldn't a lot more people in our country be encouraged to take heroine, cocaine, fentanyl, and many other harmful drugs?

How do you know that renewable energy will cause so much waste and become too costly?

Well, it's kinda hard to motivate myself when you keep getting stuck in rut with trying to improve my game after getting endless amount of rejections. Emotionally stimulating and connecting with women has become such an unbelievably difficult skill for me to learn. How am I supposed to compete with men with really tight game or have a lot of social status?

Btw, how about the fact that the human population of the entire planet keeps growing fast? Hasn't that made climate change significantly worse?

Ah, I see. It's true that America can't solve this alone.

What if policies such as the Green New Deal got passed into law?

But it's not like I haven't tried at all. I've already approached hundreds of girls in all kind of venues in so many different ways. I've already done WAY MORE than most men would even dare to do. Yet, it seems as if only been able to get a really limited amount of success largely by luck and playing the numbers game. I will say that I am fortunate to be physically attractive because if I am wasn't then I'd probably be totally fucked as I've always been on the spectrum. If I don't have natural talent at this then how can I expect to ever get very far? It's like if you aren't athletically gifted then no amount of hard work and proper training will ever make you as good as LeBron James in basketball, Connor McGregor in MMA, Mohammed Ali (in his prime) in boxing, or Tom Brady in Football, or Novak Djokovic in tennis.

No incels typically say that it's all about looks or money or some kind of well-respected career like a doctor or CEO of a corporation that gets the women. I know that those are not the main factors to attracting women. However, we know that women, particularly young girls these days, are sexually attracted to men with high social status like a famous rockstar, popular jock/frat boy, or some kind of alpha male with phenomenal game. Also, the days of being to easily get a woman by being a mediocre guy with beta traits and finding your significant other at school, work, single events, your community, or what have you are pretty much over. Young girls, especially those who are hot, have been receiving a crazy amount of attention like never before due to rise of social media and dating apps. Also, feminism, hypergamy, and modern culture have influenced women to be even further picky: Kevin Samuels here talked about how most men these days can only get sex either through rare luck or from prostitutes because most guys now are always outcompeted by the alpha males or guys with fame and the average dude has now become too boring and too socially awkward for even the average girl:

Well, I mean I have in truth found a number of women that I able to get with, but I feel like people these days have become so unbelievably picky that hardly anyone is willing to settle with anyone for any kind of relation unlike in the 1900s. Younger women these days keep turning me down just because I don't have either high social status like a celebrity or have the charisma of someone like Julien Blanc, Owen Cook, Todd Valentine, or any of those RSD guys.

So, then what do you do if millions of different people don't find you compatible? Should you then just accept that you're never find anyone who will be the right fit for you no matter what you do?

Why is it impossible to have such terrible luck that you never find any person compatible with you even if you meet and ask out millions of different people?

No, but women are inherently pickier than men for some reason. These days, they are way more picky than ever before and have way more choices than ever before and a lot of men like me have gotten rejected by hundreds of women in a row. Hence, more and more women are turning down more men for even just a casual date. So again, I don't see why logically it would really be impossible to get rejected by millions of women in a row, especially these days.