Hardkill

Can't say that Trump didn't deserve this. Also, maybe the Republicans are finally getting a taste of their own medicine with all of their gun rights propaganda they've been doing for decades.

Alright.....well let's cross our fingers and hope it's not too close. Btw, you don't in a swing state right? I ask because I wonder if you have an idea on how we could help get out the vote in swing states other than canvassing. I live in California, but unfortunately I won't be able to go canvassing in Arizona or Nevada.

From a campaign standpoint I think it's always best to say to voters that the race will be extremely close to help fully motivate voters to get out and vote. However, how do you know the polls are accurate now?

Do you realize how much error polls have? It's not just the margin of error that's shown in the polls. The sample sizes in the polls often don't fully represent the majority of all voters in the country. Moreover, many people don't answer the polls, especially young voters this day and age. Many people tend to lie or only tell the pollsters what they want to hear. Many people when they answer don't focus well on the questions. They can also easily change their minds based on how the question was ask of them or the mood. Plus, let's not forget that the polls also have been greatly underestimating the strength of Democrats since 2022 and have been overestimating Trump's strength since the beginning of the 2024 GOP primaries. Another thing is that polls more than a few weeks out from an election still do not have predictive value. Forget the polls, forget the pundits, keep an eye on the big picture including the governance of the party in power and the on the ground enthusiasm for each of the candidates. Nobody know for certain if this race will be extremely close. It may or not be close.

Biden won the presidency before in 2020 and back then he wasn't even as strong of a candidate as Harris is now. She also definitely a stronger and more popular candidate than Hillary Clinton was in 2016. Trump isn't president and JD Vance is not the vice president. Therefore, they don't currently have the levers of power that could potentially be used to overturn an election. Also, the Electoral Count Reform and Presidential Transition Improvement Act of 2022 further ensured that neither the Vice President nor a simple majority of members of both chambers of Congress can just overturn the election results. In any case, that's why we need as many poll watchers and lawyers as possible to fight back against voter suppression and any other kind of cheating. It's a good thing that almost all of the swing states have been run by Democratic governors. Only two swing states are run by Republican governors who don't like Trump or MAGA at all. Pretty much every attorney general and secretary of state in every swing state is either a Democratic or anti-MAGA Republican as well. Moreover, that's why we need to do whatever we can to help get out the vote as much as possible.

I think that a lot of moderates and independents have been realizing how much Trump and his party have never really cared about border security. More and more of them are seeing that he only cares about himself and doesn't even have a real plan for it. One big reason of why Republicans have lost so many of these special elections since 2022 is because they've been realizing how incompetent Trump and his party have been. If you ask people who don't identify as either Democrat or Republican as to exactly what Trump and the Republicans have done over the past 8 years, most of them will say that all that Trump and his party have done is cut taxes and sent only one set of stimulus checks for them during the pandemic. They can't even recall what he did to make the border more secure. Even a number of crazy right-wingers like Nick Fuentes feel like he turned out to be a fraud who let our country down:

I see.... Well, Trump is still fundamentally weak and unpopular. He has never come close to winning the popular vote and he's certainly not going to win it for the 2024 presidential election. I believe he will lose to Harris in this election. There seems to be too much going against Trump and his party now.

Democrats can and must win back rural voters. Otherwise, they will never be able to hold control of the Senate and the House in Congress for long, let alone never have a supermajority of Democrats in both chambers of Congress. A number of rural Democratic politicians have been successful with rural voters in recent years:

I found this to be a good video on why a lot of good policies have been prevented from being enacted in this country in contemporary times:

I agree with all that. So, if only about a quarter of Americans are in those right-wing echo chambers, then what about the other twenty something percent of Americans who aren't in those right-wing echo chambers but still voted for Trump for in 2016 and 2020?

I strongly disagree. One way or another we have to rebuild that New Deal coalition.

Yeah, so if that's the case, then that begs the question as to how our fractured media environment country has caused our country to become more divided than ever before.

According to Pew Research Center surveys: In 1964, 75% of rural Americans trusted the federal government to do what is right "most of the time" or "just about always." By 2019, that number had dropped to 33%. This decline in trust is attributed to various factors, including: Perceived government overreach Bureaucratic inefficiencies Unfulfilled promises Changing economic and social landscape Polarized politics Right-wing propaganda fueling erosion of trust in government To reestablish trust, it's essential to: Listen to rural concerns Deliver on promises Improve government efficiency Address rural-urban disparities Foster transparency and accountability progressive propaganda that reframes government as a force for good.

What do you think about the fact that only about 25% of Americans are stuck in some kind of right-wing echo chamber?

I love it when Trump supporters get triggered!

Centrism and conservatism do share some similarities in their approach to the status quo. Centrism and the status quo: Centrism often involves: Accepting the current state: Centrists tend to accept the existing political, social, and economic order as a starting point. Incremental adjustments: They seek to make gradual, pragmatic adjustments to the status quo rather than advocating for radical changes. Pragmatic compromises: Centrists often prioritize finding common ground and compromising to maintain stability and avoid disruption. Conservatism and the status quo: Conservatism involves: Preserving the existing order: Conservatives aim to preserve and protect the existing social, political, and economic order. Resisting significant changes: They tend to be cautious about making significant changes to the status quo, fearing unintended consequences. Emphasis on tradition: Conservatives often prioritize maintaining traditional institutions, values, and practices. While both centrism and conservatism involve working within the existing framework, the key difference lies in their motivations and approaches: Centrism seeks to make pragmatic adjustments to the status quo to address current issues and find common ground. Conservatism aims to preserve and protect the existing order, often due to a belief in its inherent value or fear of change. In summary, centrism and conservatism share some similarities in their approach to the status quo, but centrism tends to be more open to gradual adjustments, while conservatism prioritizes preservation and tradition. Then again, conservatism at times involves going backwards on social and economic issues. Any thoughts on this?

I just realized something. Most Americans don't regularly follow politics or watch the news. They say that only about 15% of people in America have made a habit of following and listening to good quality new sources and only about 25% of American people follow fox news and/or other right-wing political commentary shows regularly. Therefore, if most people haven't been actively seeking out news, including right-wing sources, then how can this toxic media environment we've been in for several years have contributed to such widespread polarization? How has it caused almost half of the country to be stuck in an echo chamber or epistemic bubble?

So, what I am getting from some of you here is that even with certain people who don't follow the right-wing media regularly will eventually hear about from some other way, like the ways you mentioned above such as word-of-mouth and social networks, local and regional media, cultural resonance, demographic targeting, etc. Also, I will say that right-wing talking points and framing often get picked up by mainstream media, amplifying their reach and legitimizing their views. Moreover, in some areas or communities, conservative voices may dominate the discourse, leaving little room for alternative perspectives.

FWIW for now:

Why would a significant number of decided voters change their minds about who to vote for, especially in this day and age when the political climate has become more polarized and calcified than ever before since the antebellum of the Civil War.

I hope you're right. However, it's still mind blowing how many undecided people who watched that debate were still undecided. As pessimistic as this may sound, my dad says that he think thats those people who watched the debate and are still having trouble deciding between a psychotic evil old bastard and an inspiring colored woman in her prime who is so eminently qualified for the job of the presidency, means that they probably are still too racist, too sexist, and too backwards to vote for her. I hope my dad is proven wrong.

If it doesn't move a significant amount of likely voters, then I wouldn't be surprised. Debates have very, very rarely made any difference in the outcome of any presidential election. Biden dropping out after his poor debate performance was an anomaly in US History.

That’s also what I was alluding to.

That’s valid point. Harris did fantastic last night, but I am somewhat disappointed that she didn’t get way more than 63% of people who watched it to think that she won the debate according to the CNN poll. When Hillary Clinton won her first debate against Trump in 2016, she also convinced about 63% of voters who watched it to think that she won that debate according to a CNN poll back then. Trump back then wasn’t nearly as bad at debating as he has been this time around.

Even though I've been finding TYT to be more and more obnoxious Cenk did make a very important point here in this vid about how conservative media for decades has been working the referee by accusing mainstream media of liberal bias. Moreover, this strategy has successfully led to mainstream outlets giving undue attention to misinformation and conspiracy theories: The Majority Report did a job of pointing out how much Megyn Kelly gaslit her viewers on why Trump lost the Trump debate: